Selecting antithrombotic therapy for patients with atrial fibrillation.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Tanaka-Esposito C
PROVIDER: S-EPMC4444782 | biostudies-literature | 2015 Jan
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Selecting antithrombotic therapy for patients with atrial fibrillation.
Tanaka-Esposito Christine C Chung Mina K MK
Cleveland Clinic journal of medicine 20150101 1
When considering anticoagulant therapy for patients with atrial fibrillation, one must balance the reduction in risk of thromboembolism that this therapy offers against the risk of bleeding that it poses. The American Heart Association, American College of Cardiology, and Heart Rhythm Society updated their atrial fibrillation guidelines in 2014. This review outlines a rationale for clinical decision-making based on the new guidelines and summarizes the currently approved drugs. ...[more]
Similar Datasets
Project description:BackgroundCoronary artery disease (CAD) and atrial fibrillation (AF) frequently coexist in clinical practice, making it challenging for the treating physician to choose anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapies. The aim of this study was to investigate antithrombotic strategies and assess related adverse outcomes in stable coronary artery disease (SCAD) and acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients with AF when the CHA2DS2-VASc score was ≥2.MethodsWe performed a retrospective study and collected data from a computer-based patient record management system in Zhengzhou University People's Hospital in China. In total, 2978 patients with a hospital discharge diagnosis of CAD and concomitant AF who met the inclusion criteria were enrolled from January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2016, and data from 2050 patients were finally analysed. The χ2 test was used to compare the incidences of clinical endpoints between the SCAD+AF group and the ACS + AF group. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictive factors of adverse outcomes in both groups.ResultsOral anticoagulant (OAC) monotherapy was the most common antithrombotic therapy in SCAD+AF patients (49.55%), while double antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) was the most common treatment in ACS + AF patients (54.19%) at discharge. OAC monotherapy significantly increased and the use of single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) decreased during follow-up (34 ± 13 months) when compared to their use at discharge in the SCAD+AF group (all p < 0.001). In the ACS + AF group, the proportion of patients using DAPT decreased notably, while the proportions of patients using SAPT and dual therapy (DT) combining OAC with SAPT increased significantly during follow-up (all p < 0.001) compared to the proportions at discharge. According to multivariable Cox regression analysis, age, hypertension and prior stroke were independent risk factors for ischaemic stroke in the SCAD+AF group and ACS + AF group (all p < 0.05). OAC was an independent protective factor for ischaemic stroke in both groups (all p < 0.05). Previous bleeding independently increased the risk of haemorrhage in both groups (all p < 0.01).ConclusionsIn this study, the proportion of anticoagulant-antiplatelet combined therapy was low in ACS + AF patients with high stroke risk. In clinical practice, the awareness of anticoagulation needs to be strengthened regarding patients with CAD and AF.
| S-EPMC7339421 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background To investigate the effectiveness and safety of withholding or restarting antithrombotic agents, and different antithrombotic therapies among patients with atrial fibrillation post-intracranial hemorrhage. Methods and Results This is a nationwide retrospective cohort study involving patients with atrial fibrillation receiving antithrombotic therapies who subsequently developed intracranial hemorrhage between January 1, 2011 and December 31, 2017. The risk of ischemic stroke (IS), recurrent intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), and all-cause mortality were investigated between patients receiving no treatment versus patients reinitiating oral anticoagulants (OACs) or antiplatelet agents, and warfarin versus non-vitamin K antagonist OACs. We applied inverse probability of treatment weighting to balance the baseline characteristics and Cox proportional hazards model to estimate the hazard ratios (HRs) of different outcomes of interest. Compared with no treatment, OACs reduced the risk of IS (HR, 0.61; 0.42-0.89), without increase in the risk of ICH (1.15, 0.66-2.02); antiplatelet agent users showed a similar risk of IS (1.13, 0.81-1.56) and increased risk of ICH (1.81, 1.07-3.04). Use of OACs or antiplatelet agents did not reduce the risk of all-cause mortality (0.85, 0.72-1.01; and 0.88, 0.75-1.03, respectively). Compared with warfarin, non-vitamin K antagonist OAC users showed a similar risk of IS (0.92, 0.50-1.70), non-significantly reduced risk of ICH (0.53, 0.22-1.30), and significantly reduced all-cause mortality (0.60, 0.43-0.84). Conclusions OACs are recommended in patients with atrial fibrillation and intracranial hemorrhage because they reduced the risk of IS with no increase in the risk of subsequent ICH. Non-vitamin K antagonist OACs are recommended over warfarin owing to their survival benefits.
| S-EPMC9075312 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundOral anticoagulants (OACs) can help prevent stroke in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). The aim of this study was to characterize the use of OACs other than direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs) for NVAF.MethodsPatients with NVAF taking antithrombotics other than DTIs were enrolled in this cross-sectional study. Patient demographics and medication history were collected, and the patients were classified as taking antiplatelet monotherapy (AP), anticoagulant monotherapy (AC), or combination therapy (AP+AC). OAC users were also stratified as naïve (N; initiated within 6 months), switcher (S; switched within 6 months), or prevalent user (P; continued for >6 months).ResultsA total of 3053 patients (AP, 216; AC, 2381; AP+AC, 456) from 268 sites were enrolled from 2012 to 2013. Significant differences were observed in CHADS2 scores (AP/AC/AP+AC: 2.0/2.1/2.7, P<0.0001), angina complications (20.1/8.6/32.1, P<0.0001), myocardial infarction (5.1/2.8/18.1, P<0.0001), prothrombin time-international normalized ratio (PT-INR) (-/2.00/1.94, P=0.0350), and others. There were 2831 OAC users (N, 328; S, 213; P, 2290). Significant differences were observed in history of bleeding (N/S/P: 2.4/9.4/4.5, P<0.001), PT-INR (1.83/2.01/2.00, P<0.0001), and others.ConclusionsPatients taking AP+AC had higher CHADS2 scores than those taking an AP or AC alone. Additionally, the combination therapy (AP+AC) was preferred in patients with cardiovascular comorbidity. Changes in AC regimens were not influenced by CHADS2 scores or complications but influenced by history of bleeding. These characteristics were thus identified as major factors affecting the selection of antithrombotic regimens other than DTIs in patients with NVAF.
| S-EPMC5388034 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Atrial fibrillation (AF) is prevalent in patients with aortic stenosis (AS) undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Depending on the timing of AF detection, it is usually categorized as pre-existing AF or new-onset AF. Antiplatelet therapy, rather than a vitamin K antagonist, may be considered as the primary treatment for patients without an indication for oral anticoagulants who undergo TAVR. However, the optimal postprocedural antithrombotic regimen for patients with AF undergoing TAVR remains unknown. In this review, we briefly introduce the management strategies of antithrombotic therapy and list the evidence from related studies to elucidate the optimal antithrombotic management for patients with AF undergoing TAVR.
| S-EPMC7576914 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Importance:Antithrombotic therapies are effective in both primary and secondary stroke prophylaxis in high-risk patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), but they are often underused in community practice. Objective:To examine prestroke and poststroke antithrombotic treatment patterns and long-term outcomes in patients with AF presenting with ischemic stroke. Design, Setting, and Participants:A retrospective cohort study of Danish patients with AF, with a prestroke CHA2DS2-VASc score of 1 or higher for men and 2 or higher for women, and presenting with ischemic stroke was conducted from January 1, 2004, to January 31, 2017. Data on hospital admission, prescription fillings, and vital status were assessed using several Danish nationwide registries. Exposures:Patients who survived 100 days after discharge were divided into 3 groups according to poststroke antithrombotic therapy: oral anticoagulation (OAC) therapy, antiplatelet therapy alone, or no antithrombotic therapy. Main Outcomes and Measures:Long-term outcomes (thromboembolic events and bleeding complications) were examined using multivariable Cox regression analyses across the 3 groups. Results:Among 30?626 patients with AF admitted with ischemic stroke, 11?139 patients (36.3%) received OAC therapy (44.3% female; median age, 79 years [interquartile range, 73-85 years]), 11?874 (38.8%) received antiplatelet therapy alone (55.0% female; median age, 82 years [interquartile range, 75-88 years]), and 7613 (24.9%) received no antithrombotic therapy before stroke (53.8% female; median age, 80 years [interquartile range, 71-86 years]). Following stroke, 31.3% of those receiving antiplatelet therapy alone and 43.7% of those receiving no antithrombotic therapy before stroke shifted to OAC therapy. Yet, 37.5% of patients with stroke did not receive OAC therapy following stroke. However, OAC treatment rates increased over time. During a maximum of 10 years of follow-up, 17.5%, 21.2%, and 21.5% experienced a new thromboembolic event and 72.7%, 86.4%, and 86.2% died among those treated with OAC therapy, antiplatelet therapy, or no antithrombotic therapy, respectively. Poststroke OAC therapy was associated with lower risk of recurrent thromboembolic events (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.73-0.89) and no significant difference in bleeding complications (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.86-1.10), compared with no poststroke antithrombotic therapy. In contrast, there were no significant differences for those treated with poststroke antiplatelet therapy and no antithrombotic therapy. Conclusions and Relevance:Patients with AF receiving poststroke OAC therapy had lower risk of recurrent thromboembolic events. Our findings suggest a substantial opportunity for improving primary and secondary stroke prophylaxis in high-risk patients with AF.
| S-EPMC6324317 | biostudies-other
Project description:Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained arrhythmia, that substantially increases morbidity and mortality. AF is gaining in clinical and economic importance, with stroke and thromboembolism being major complications. In this article, the evidence for AF treatment trial of antithrombotic therapy is reviewed. Stroke risk stratification of patients with AF is discussed, and practical recommendations for thromboprophylaxis are presented.
| S-EPMC1860779 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Patients with atrial fibrillation affected by an acute coronary syndrome have indications for oral anticoagulation and dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and a P2Y12 adenosine diphosphate receptor inhibitor after coronary artery stenting. The concurrent use of all 3 agents, termed triple oral antithrombotic therapy, significantly increases the risk of bleeding. To date, there is a lack of evidence on the proper combination and duration of anticoagulant and antiplatelet agents in patients with indications for both therapies. As such, care has been guided by expert opinion, and there is wide variation in clinician practice. In this review, the latest evidence on the risks and benefits of triple oral antithrombotic therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation after coronary artery stenting is summarized. We discuss the clinical risk scores useful in guiding the prediction of stroke, bleeding, and stent thrombosis. Additionally, we highlight where additional evidence is needed to determine the proper balance of anticoagulant and antiplatelet agents in this patient population.
| S-EPMC6649565 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundsWe investigated the prognostic impact of antithrombotic regimens at 1-year after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) among patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).Method and resultsA total of 13,278 AF patients who underwent PCI from 2009 to 2013 were selected from Korean National Health Insurance Service database. Patients were categorized by antithrombotic regimens at 1-year after PCI: (1) OAC with or without single antiplatelet (OAC±SAPT); (2) triple therapy (TT) and (3) antiplatelets (APT) only. After propensity score matching, composite ischaemia (death, myocardial infarction, and stroke), composite bleeding (intracranial hemorrhage and gastrointestinal bleeding), and a composite clinical outcome (composite ischaemia and bleeding) were compared. Of total population, 1,100 (8.3%), 746 (5.6%), and 11,432 (86.1%) were treated with OAC±SAPT, TT, and APT only, respectively. Compared to OAC±SAPT group, the TT group had significantly higher risk of the composite clinical outcome (hazard ratio [HR] 1.46, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.00-2.13) attributed to a higher trend in both ischaemia (HR 1.63, 95% CI 0.99-2.67) and bleeding (HR 1.22, 95% CI 0.69-2.13). The APT only group showed a higher risk of ischaemia (HR 1.85, 95% CI 1.25-2.74), despite a lower risk of bleeding (HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.32-0.94) compared to OAC±SAPT group.ConclusionsOAC±SAPT was associated with better clinical outcomes compared to TT or APT only treatments, beyond 1-year after PCI among Asians with AF.
| S-EPMC7561121 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundIn recent years, direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have entered clinical practice for stroke prevention in non-valvular atrial fibrillation or prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism. However, remaining uncertainty regarding DOAC use in some clinical scenarios commonly encountered in the real world has not been fully explored in clinical trials.MethodsWe report on use of a Delphi consensus process on DOAC use in non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients. The consensus process dealt with 9 main topics: (i) DOACs vs vitamin K antagonists in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients; (ii) therapeutic options for patients with stable total time in range treated with vitamin K antagonists; (iii) therapeutic options for patients aged > 85 years; (iv) therapeutic management of hyperfiltering patients; (v) pharmacologic interactions; (vi) therapeutic options in the long-term treatment (prevention) of patients with AF and acute coronary syndrome after the triple therapy; (vii) low doses of DOACs in AF patients; (viii) ischemic stroke in patients inappropriately treated with low doses of DOACs; (ix) management of patients taking DOACs with left atrial appendage thrombosis.ResultsA total of 101 physicians (cardiologists, internists, geriatricians, and hematologists) from Italy expressed their level of agreement on each statement by using a 5-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree; 2 = disagree; 3 = somewhat agree; 4 = agree; 5 = strongly agree). Votes 1-2 were considered to be disagreement; votes 3-5 were considered to be agreement. Agreement among the respondents of ≥ 66% for each statement was considered consensus. A brief discussion of the results for each topic is also reported.ConclusionsIn clinical practice, there is still uncertainty on DOAC use, especially in elderly, fragile, comorbid, and hyperfiltering patients.
| S-EPMC7711025 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectivesTo compare the net clinical benefit of oral anticoagulant (OAC) monotherapy to OAC plus single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and stable coronary artery disease (CAD) at 1- and 3-year after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).BackgroundIt has not been studied whether the net clinical benefit of the antithrombotic treatment options differs depending on the elapsed time from the index PCI.MethodsUsing the Korean nationwide claims database, we included AF patients who underwent PCI from 2009 to 2019 and constructed two cohorts: 1- and 3-year after PCI. In each cohort, the baseline characteristics of two groups were balanced using propensity score weighting. Ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, major bleeding, and composite clinical outcomes were analyzed.ResultsAmong patients with 1-year after PCI, OAC monotherapy (n = 678), and OAC plus SAPT (n = 3,159) showed comparable results for all clinical outcomes. In patients with 3-year after PCI, OAC monotherapy (n = 1,038) and OAC plus SAPT (n = 2,128) showed comparable results for ischemic stroke and myocardial infarction, but OAC monotherapy was associated with a lower risk of composite clinical outcomes (HR 0.762, 95% CI 0.607-0.950), mainly driven by the reduction of major bleeding risk (HR 0.498, 95% CI 0.345-0.701).ConclusionOral anticoagulant monotherapy may be a comparable choice for patients with AF and stable CAD compared to OAC plus SAPT. In patients with stable CAD more than 3-year after index PCI, OAC monotherapy would be a better choice, being associated with less major bleeding and a positive net clinical benefit.
| S-EPMC9441665 | biostudies-literature