Dataset Information

Protein flexibility in the light of structural alphabets.

ABSTRACT: Protein structures are valuable tools to understand protein function. Nonetheless, proteins are often considered as rigid macromolecules while their structures exhibit specific flexibility, which is essential to complete their functions. Analyses of protein structures and dynamics are often performed with a simplified three-state description, i.e., the classical secondary structures. More precise and complete description of protein backbone conformation can be obtained using libraries of small protein fragments that are able to approximate every part of protein structures. These libraries, called structural alphabets (SAs), have been widely used in structure analysis field, from definition of ligand binding sites to superimposition of protein structures. SAs are also well suited to analyze the dynamics of protein structures. Here, we review innovative approaches that investigate protein flexibility based on SAs description. Coupled to various sources of experimental data (e.g., B-factor) and computational methodology (e.g., Molecular Dynamic simulation), SAs turn out to be powerful tools to analyze protein dynamics, e.g., to examine allosteric mechanisms in large set of structures in complexes, to identify order/disorder transition. SAs were also shown to be quite efficient to predict protein flexibility from amino-acid sequence. Finally, in this review, we exemplify the interest of SAs for studying flexibility with different cases of proteins implicated in pathologies and diseases.

SUBMITTER: Craveur P

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4445325 | biostudies-literature | 2015

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Protein flexibility in the light of structural alphabets.

Craveur Pierrick P Joseph Agnel P AP Esque Jeremy J Narwani Tarun J TJ Noël Floriane F Shinada Nicolas N Goguet Matthieu M Leonard Sylvain S Poulain Pierre P Bertrand Olivier O Faure Guilhem G Rebehmed Joseph J Ghozlane Amine A Swapna Lakshmipuram S LS Bhaskara Ramachandra M RM Barnoud Jonathan J Téletchéa Stéphane S Jallu Vincent V Cerny Jiri J Schneider Bohdan B Etchebest Catherine C Srinivasan Narayanaswamy N Gelly Jean-Christophe JC de Brevern Alexandre G AG

Frontiers in molecular biosciences 20150527

Protein structures are valuable tools to understand protein function. Nonetheless, proteins are often considered as rigid macromolecules while their structures exhibit specific flexibility, which is essential to complete their functions. Analyses of protein structures and dynamics are often performed with a simplified three-state description, i.e., the classical secondary structures. More precise and complete description of protein backbone conformation can be obtained using libraries of small p ...[more]

PMID: 26075209

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND: In structural genomics, an important goal is the detection and classification of protein-protein interactions, given the structures of the interacting partners. We have developed empirical energy functions to identify native structures of protein-protein complexes among sets of decoy structures. To understand the role of amino acid diversity, we parameterized a series of functions, using a hierarchy of amino acid alphabets of increasing complexity, with 2, 3, 4, 6, and 20 amino acid groups. Compared to previous work, we used the simplest possible functional form, with residue-residue interactions and a stepwise distance-dependence. We used increased computational resources, however, constructing 290,000 decoys for 219 protein-protein complexes, with a realistic docking protocol where the protein partners are flexible and interact through a molecular mechanics energy function. The energy parameters were optimized to correctly assign as many native complexes as possible. To resolve the multiple minimum problem in parameter space, over 64000 starting parameter guesses were tried for each energy function. The optimized functions were tested by cross validation on subsets of our native and decoy structures, by blind tests on series of native and decoy structures available on the Web, and on models for 13 complexes submitted to the CAPRI structure prediction experiment. RESULTS: Performance is similar to several other statistical potentials of the same complexity. For example, the CAPRI target structure is correctly ranked ahead of 90% of its decoys in 6 cases out of 13. The hierarchy of amino acid alphabets leads to a coherent hierarchy of energy functions, with qualitatively similar parameters for similar amino acid types at all levels. Most remarkably, the performance with six amino acid classes is equivalent to that of the most detailed, 20-class energy function. CONCLUSION: This suggests that six carefully chosen amino acid classes are sufficient to encode specificity in protein-protein interactions, and provide a starting point to develop more complicated energy functions.

Dataset Information

Protein flexibility in the light of structural alphabets.

Publications

Protein flexibility in the light of structural alphabets.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets