Dataset Information

ROS1 rearrangements in lung adenocarcinoma: prognostic impact, therapeutic options and genetic variability.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:While recent data show that crizotinib is highly effective in patients with ROS1 rearrangement, few data is available about the prognostic impact, the predictive value for different treatments, and the genetic heterogeneity of ROS1-positive patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS:1137 patients with adenocarcinoma of the lung were analyzed regarding their ROS1 status. In positive cases, next-generation sequencing (NGS) was performed. Clinical characteristics, treatments and outcome of these patients were assessed. Overall survival (OS) was compared with genetically defined subgroups of ROS1-negative patients. RESULTS:19 patients of 1035 evaluable (1.8%) had ROS1-rearrangement. The median OS has not been reached. Stage IV patients with ROS1-rearrangement had the best OS of all subgroups (36.7 months, p < 0.001). 9 of 14 (64.2%) patients had at least one response to chemotherapy. Estimated mean OS for patients receiving chemotherapy and crizotinib was 5.3 years. Ten patients with ROS1-rearrangement (52.6%) harbored additional aberrations. CONCLUSION:ROS1-rearangement is not only a predictive marker for response to crizotinib, but also seems to be the one of the best prognostic molecular markers in NSCLC reported so far. In stage IV patients, response to chemotherapy was remarkable high and overall survival was significantly better compared to other subgroups including EGFR-mutated and ALK-fusion-positive NSCLC.

SUBMITTER: Scheffler M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4496376 | biostudies-literature | 2015 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

ROS1 rearrangements in lung adenocarcinoma: prognostic impact, therapeutic options and genetic variability.

Scheffler Matthias M Schultheis Anne A Teixido Cristina C Michels Sebastian S Morales-Espinosa Daniela D Viteri Santiago S Hartmann Wolfgang W Merkelbach-Bruse Sabine S Fischer Rieke R Schildhaus Hans-Ulrich HU Fassunke Jana J Sebastian Martin M Serke Monika M Kaminsky Britta B Randerath Winfried W Gerigk Ulrich U Ko Yon-Dschun YD Krüger Stefan S Schnell Roland R Rothe Achim A Kropf-Sanchen Cornelia C Heukamp Lukas L Rosell Rafael R Büttner Reinhard R Wolf Jürgen J

Oncotarget 20150401 12

<h4>Background</h4>While recent data show that crizotinib is highly effective in patients with ROS1 rearrangement, few data is available about the prognostic impact, the predictive value for different treatments, and the genetic heterogeneity of ROS1-positive patients.<h4>Patients and methods</h4>1137 patients with adenocarcinoma of the lung were analyzed regarding their ROS1 status. In positive cases, next-generation sequencing (NGS) was performed. Clinical characteristics, treatments and outco ...[more]

PMID: 25868855

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundROS1 fusion is an infrequent, but attractive target for therapy in patients with metastatic non- small-cell lung cancer. In studies on mainly late-stage disease, the prevalence of ROS1 fusions is about 1-3%. In early-stage lung cancer ROS1 might also provide a fruitful target for neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy. In the present study, we investigated the prevalence of ROS1 fusion in a Norwegian cohort of early-stage lung cancer. We also explored whether positive ROS1 immunohistochemical (IHC) stain was associated with certain mutations, clinical characteristics and outcomes.MethodsThe study was performed using biobank material from 921 lung cancer patients including 542 patients with adenocarcinoma surgically resected during 2006-2018. Initially, we screened the samples with two different IHC clones (D4D6 and SP384) targeting ROS1. All samples that showed more than weak or focal staining, as well as a subgroup of negative samples, were analyzed with ROS1 fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and next-generation sequencing (NGS) with a comprehensive NGS DNA and RNA panel. Positive ROS1-fusion was defined as those samples positive in at least two of the three methods (IHC, FISH, NGS).ResultsFifty cases were IHC positive. Of these, three samples were both NGS and FISH-positive and considered positive for ROS1 fusion. Two more samples were FISH positive only, and whilst IHC and NGS were negative. These were also negative with Reverse Transcription quantitative real time Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-qPCR). The prevalence of ROS1 fusion in adenocarcinomas was 0.6%. All cases with ROS1 fusion had TP53 mutations. IHC-positivity was associated with adenocarcinoma. Among SP384-IHC positive cases we also found an association with never smoking status. There was no association between positive IHC and overall survival, time to relapse, age, stage, sex or pack-year of smoking.ConclusionsROS1 seems to be less frequent in early-stage disease than in advanced stages. IHC is a sensitive, but less specific method and the results need to be confirmed with another method like FISH or NGS.

Project description:BackgroundBased on computed tomography (CT) findings of lung cancer, solid nodules have a much worse prognosis than subsolid nodules, even if the nodules are subcentimeter in size. There is, however, no systematic method for determining the prognosis of solid tumors on CT. This study aimed to discover the prognostic factor of early-stage solid lung adenocarcinoma using three-dimensional CT volumetry.MethodsPatients with pathological stage I solid lung adenocarcinoma who underwent complete resection between 2007 and 2012 were selected in this retrospective study. Clinicopathological data and preoperative multidetector CT findings, such as tumor size on the two-dimensional axial image, three-dimensional tumor volume between -600 and 199 HU, and three-dimensional solid volume between 0 and 199 HU, which corresponded to highly solid components, were compared between recurrence and non-recurrence. Furthermore, these radiological values were compared to pathological invasive volume (PIV).ResultsDuring this time, 709 patients had their lung cancer completely removed. From this cohort, 90 patients with pathological stage I solid lung adenocarcinoma were selected. In addition, recurrence was found in 26 patients (28.9%). Although two-dimensional axial image, serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level, and SUVmax on 18F fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) did not differ statistically between recurrent and non-recurrent patients, three-dimensional tumor and solid tumor volume did. Multivariate analysis indicated that three-dimensional solid tumor volume [hazard ratio: 2.440; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.110-5.361, P=0.026] and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation (hazard ratio: 4.307; 95% CI: 1.328-13.977, P=0.015) were significantly associated with disease-free survival (DFS). When three-dimensional tumor and solid tumor volume were compared to PIV, three-dimensional solid tumor volume (3,091 mm3 on average) showed a highly similar value with PIV (2,930 mm3 on average), whereas three-dimensional tumor volume (6,175 mm3 on average) was significantly larger than PIV (P<0.001).ConclusionsIn patients with early-stage solid lung adenocarcinoma, the measurement of three-dimensional solid tumor volume, which is correlated with PIV, accurately predicted the postoperative outcome.

Dataset Information

ROS1 rearrangements in lung adenocarcinoma: prognostic impact, therapeutic options and genetic variability.

Publications

ROS1 rearrangements in lung adenocarcinoma: prognostic impact, therapeutic options and genetic variability.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets