Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Objective
We reduced the computed tomography (CT)-reconstructed field of view (FOV), increasing pixel density across airway structures and reducing partial volume effects, to determine whether this would improve accuracy of airway wall thickness quantification.Methods
We performed CT imaging on a lung phantom and 29 participants. Images were reconstructed at 30-, 15-, and 10-cm FOV using a medium-smooth kernel. Cross-sectional airway dimensions were compared at each FOV with repeated-measures analysis of variance.Results
Phantom measurements were more accurate when FOV decreased from 30 to 15 cm (P < 0.05). Decreasing FOV further to 10 cm did not significantly improve accuracy. Human airway measurements similarly decreased by decreasing FOV (P < 0.001). Percent changes in all measurements when reducing FOV from 30 to 15 cm were less than 3%.Conclusions
Airway measurements at 30-cm FOV are near the limits of CT resolution using a medium-smooth kernel. Reducing reconstructed FOV would minimally increase sensitivity to detect differences in airway dimensions.
SUBMITTER: Sheshadri A
PROVIDER: S-EPMC4504751 | biostudies-literature | 2015 Jul-Aug
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Sheshadri Ajay A Rodriguez Alfonso A Chen Ryan R Kozlowski James J Burgdorf Dana D Koch Tammy T Tarsi Jaime J Schutz Rebecca R Wilson Brad B Schechtman Kenneth K Leader Joseph K JK Hoffman Eric A EA Castro Mario M Fain Sean B SB Gierada David S DS
Journal of computer assisted tomography 20150701 4
<h4>Objective</h4>We reduced the computed tomography (CT)-reconstructed field of view (FOV), increasing pixel density across airway structures and reducing partial volume effects, to determine whether this would improve accuracy of airway wall thickness quantification.<h4>Methods</h4>We performed CT imaging on a lung phantom and 29 participants. Images were reconstructed at 30-, 15-, and 10-cm FOV using a medium-smooth kernel. Cross-sectional airway dimensions were compared at each FOV with repe ...[more]