Dataset Information

Trunk restraint therapy: the continuous use of the harness could promote feedback dependence in poststroke patients: a randomized trial.

ABSTRACT: The objective of this study was to evaluate the long-term effects of the task-specific training with trunk restraint compared with the free one in poststroke reaching movements. The design was randomized trial. The setting was University of Campinas (Unicamp). Twenty hemiparetic chronic stroke patients were selected and randomized into 2 training groups: trunk restraint group (TRG) (reaching training with trunk restraint) and trunk free group (TFG) (unrestraint reaching). Twenty sessions with 45 minutes of training were accomplished. The patients were evaluated in pretreatment (PRE), posttreatment (POST) and 3 months after the completed training (RET) (follow-up). Main outcome measures were modified Ashworth scale, Barthel index, Fugl-Meyer scale, and kinematic analysis (movement trajectory, velocity, angles). A significant improvement, which maintained in the RET test, was found in the motor (P?

SUBMITTER: de Oliveira Cacho R

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4554010 | biostudies-literature | 2015 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Trunk restraint therapy: the continuous use of the harness could promote feedback dependence in poststroke patients: a randomized trial.

de Oliveira Cacho Roberta R Cacho Enio Walker A EWA Ortolan Rodrigo L RL Cliquet Alberto A Borges Guilherme G

Medicine 20150301 12

The objective of this study was to evaluate the long-term effects of the task-specific training with trunk restraint compared with the free one in poststroke reaching movements. The design was randomized trial. The setting was University of Campinas (Unicamp). Twenty hemiparetic chronic stroke patients were selected and randomized into 2 training groups: trunk restraint group (TRG) (reaching training with trunk restraint) and trunk free group (TFG) (unrestraint reaching). Twenty sessions with 45 ...[more]

PMID: 25816031

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND:Virtual reality and augmented feedback have become more prevalent as training methods to improve balance. Few reports exist on the benefits of providing trunk motion visual feedback (VFB) during treadmill walking, and most of those reports only describe within session changes. RESEARCH QUESTION:To determine whether trunk motion VFB treadmill walking would improve over-ground balance for older adults with self-reported balance problems. METHODS:40 adults (75.8 years (SD 6.5)) with self-reported balance difficulties or a history of falling were randomized to a control or experimental group. Everyone walked on a treadmill at a comfortable speed 3×/week for 4 weeks in 2?min bouts separated by a seated rest. The control group was instructed to look at a stationary bulls-eye target while the experimental group also saw a moving cursor superimposed on the stationary bulls-eye that represented VFB of their walking trunk motion. The experimental group was instructed to keep the cursor in the center of the bulls-eye. Somatosensory (monofilaments and joint position testing) and vestibular function (canal specific clinical head impulses) was evaluated prior to intervention. Balance and mobility were tested before and after the intervention using Berg Balance Test, BESTest, mini-BESTest, and Six Minute Walk. RESULTS:There were no significant differences between groups before the intervention. The experimental group significantly improved on the BESTest (p?=?0.031) and the mini-BEST (p?=?0.019). The control group did not improve significantly on any measure. Individuals with more profound sensory impairments had a larger improvement on dynamic balance subtests of the BESTest. SIGNIFICANCE:Older adults with self-reported balance problems improve their dynamic balance after training using trunk motion VFB treadmill walking. Individuals with worse sensory function may benefit more from trunk motion VFB during walking than individuals with intact sensory function.

Project description:Background The exercise strategy that yields the greatest improvement in both cardiorespiratory fitness (V̇O2peak$$ \dot{\mathrm{V}}{\mathrm{O}}_{2\mathrm{peak}} $$) and walking capacity poststroke has not been determined. This study aimed to determine whether conventional moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) or high-intensity interval training (HIIT) have different effects on V̇O2peak$$ \dot{\mathrm{V}}{\mathrm{O}}_{2\mathrm{peak}} $$ and 6-minute walk distance (6MWD). Methods and Results In this 24-week superiority trial, people with poststroke gait dysfunction were randomized to MICT (5 days/week) or HIIT (3 days/week with 2 days/week of MICT). MICT trained to target intensity at the ventilatory anaerobic threshold. HIIT trained at the maximal tolerable treadmill speed/grade using a novel program of 2 work-to-recovery protocols: 30:60 and 120:180 seconds. V̇O2 and heart rate was measured during performance of the exercise that was prescribed at 8 and 24 weeks for treatment fidelity. Main outcomes were change in V̇O2peak$$ \dot{\mathrm{V}}{\mathrm{O}}_{2\mathrm{peak}} $$ and 6MWD. Assessors were blinded to the treatment group for V̇O2peak$$ \dot{\mathrm{V}}{\mathrm{O}}_{2\mathrm{peak}} $$ but not 6MWD. Secondary outcomes were change in ventilatory anaerobic threshold, cognition, gait-economy, 10-meter gait-velocity, balance, stair-climb performance, strength, and quality-of-life. Among 47 participants randomized to either MICT (n=23) or HIIT (n=24) (mean age, 62±11 years; 81% men), 96% completed training. In intention-to-treat analysis, change in V̇O2peak$$ \dot{\mathrm{V}}{\mathrm{O}}_{2\mathrm{peak}} $$ for MICT versus HIIT was 2.4±2.7 versus 5.7±3.1 mL·kg-1·min-1 (mean difference, 3.2 [95% CI, 1.5-4.8]; P<0.001), and change in 6MWD was 70.9±44.3 versus 83.4±53.6 m (mean difference, 12.5 [95% CI, -17 to 42]; P=0.401). HIIT had greater improvement in ventilatory anaerobic threshold (mean difference, 2.07 mL·kg-1·min-1 [95% CI, 0.59-3.6]; P=0.008). No other between-group differences were observed. During V̇O2 monitoring at 8 and 24 weeks, MICT reached 84±14% to 87±18% of V̇O2peak$$ \dot{\mathrm{V}}{\mathrm{O}}_{2\mathrm{peak}} $$ while HIIT reached 101±22% to 112±14% of V̇O2peak$$ \dot{\mathrm{V}}{\mathrm{O}}_{2\mathrm{peak}} $$ (during peak bouts). Conclusions HIIT resulted in more than a 2-fold greater and clinically important change in V̇O2peak$$ \dot{\mathrm{V}}{\mathrm{O}}_{2\mathrm{peak}} $$ than MICT. Training to target (ventilatory anaerobic threshold) during MICT resulted in ~3 times the minimal clinically important difference in 6MWD, which was similar to HIIT. These findings show proof of concept that HIIT yields greater improvements in cardiorespiratory fitness than conventional MICT in appropriately screened individuals. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03006731.

Dataset Information

Trunk restraint therapy: the continuous use of the harness could promote feedback dependence in poststroke patients: a randomized trial.

Publications

Trunk restraint therapy: the continuous use of the harness could promote feedback dependence in poststroke patients: a randomized trial.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets