Dataset Information

The expression status and prognostic significance of programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 in gastrointestinal tract cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression has been observed in various malignancies. However, the association between PD-L1 expression and the survival of patients with gastrointestinal tract cancer remains controversial. Besides, the rate of PD-L1 positivity on tumor cells of digestive tract cancer is not clear. Thus, we performed a meta-analysis by incorporating all available evidence to evaluate the rate of PD-L1 positivity and the overall survival (OS) according to PD-L1 status in patients with gastrointestinal tract cancer.

Methods

Electronic databases were searched for eligible literature. Hazard ratios (HRs) for OS with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) according to the expression status of PD-L1 evaluated by immunohistochemistry were extracted. The outcomes were synthesized based on a random-effects model.

Results

Fifteen studies (only nine reported OS) that involved 2,993 gastrointestinal tract cancer patients stratified by PD-L1 status were eligible for inclusion in our study. We found the PD-L1-positive expression rate was 0.495 (95% CI 0.415-0.576) if 10% was taken as the cut-off value. When the H-score method was used to evaluate PD-L1 expression, it showed that the PD-L1 positive rate was 0.639 (95% CI 0.490-0.765) if the cut-off value was <50, which was higher than when using >50 as the cut-off point (0.449, 95% CI 0.417-0.483). Additionally, PD-L1-positive gastrointestinal tract cancer patients were associated with significantly poorer OS when compared to negative ones (HR 1.61, 95% CI 1.10-2.35, P=0.014). Subgroup analysis presented similar significant results in patients with esophageal cancer (HR 2.56, 95% CI 1.55-4.21, P<0.001).

Conclusion

The positive expression rate of PD-L1 was nearly 50% no matter which method for immunohistochemistry evaluation we chose. Additionally, positive PD-L1 expression status in tumor cells is a risk factor for prognosis of gastrointestinal tract cancer, especially esophageal cancer.

SUBMITTER: Huang B

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4592050 | biostudies-literature | 2015

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

The expression status and prognostic significance of programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 in gastrointestinal tract cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Huang Baohua B Chen Lei L Bao Cuixia C Sun Chengming C Li Jie J Wang Lipeng L Zhang Xia X

OncoTargets and therapy 20150915

<h4>Background</h4>Programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression has been observed in various malignancies. However, the association between PD-L1 expression and the survival of patients with gastrointestinal tract cancer remains controversial. Besides, the rate of PD-L1 positivity on tumor cells of digestive tract cancer is not clear. Thus, we performed a meta-analysis by incorporating all available evidence to evaluate the rate of PD-L1 positivity and the overall survival (OS) according ...[more]

PMID: 26451118

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundThe prognostic significance of programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression on circulating tumor cells (CTCs) has been explored but is still in controversy. We performed, for the first time, a meta-analysis to systematically evaluate its prognostic value in human cancers.MethodsLiterature databases were searched for eligible studies prior to June 30, 2021. The pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated for the associations of pre-treatment and post-treatment PD-L1+ CTCs with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Subgroup analyses with regards to cancer type, treatment, CTC enrichment method, PD-L1 detection method, cut-off, and specifically the comparison model were performed.ResultsWe included 30 eligible studies (32 cohorts, 1419 cancer patients) in our analysis. Pre-treatment PD-L1+ CTCs detected by immunofluorescence (IF) tended to predict better PFS (HR = 0.55, 95% CI 0.28-1.08, p = 0.084) and OS (HR = 0.61, 95% CI 0.36-1.04, p = 0.067) for immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment, but were significantly associated with unfavorable survival for non-ICI therapies (PFS: HR = 1.85, 95% CI 1.21-2.85, p = 0.005; OS: HR = 2.44, 95% CI 1.69-3.51, p < 0.001). Post-treatment PD-L1+ CTCs predicted markedly worse PFS and OS. The prognostic value was obviously modulated by comparison models. Among patients with detectable CTCs, PD-L1+ individuals had comparable survival to PD-L1- individuals, except ICI treatment for which PD-L1+ may predict better PFS (HR = 0.42, 95% CI 0.17-1.06, p = 0.067). Patients with PD-L1+ CTCs had worse survival prognosis compared to those without PD-L1+ CTCs in overall analysis (PFS: HR = 2.10, 95% CI 1.59-2.77, p < 0.001; OS: HR = 2.55, 95% CI 1.70-3.81, p < 0.001) and in most subgroups.ConclusionsOur analysis demonstrated that PD-L1 positive expression on CTCs predicted better survival prognosis for ICI treatment but worse survival for other therapies, which thus can be potentially used as a prognostic marker of malignant tumor treatment. However, the prognostic value of PD-L1+ CTCs for ICI treatment needs validation by more large-scale studies in the future.

Project description:Background: Programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression has been shown to correlate with poor prognosis in diverse human cancers. However, limited data exist on the prognostic and clinicopathologic significance of PD-L1 expression in prostate cancers (PCa), and the curative effect of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy remains controversial. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to evaluate the prognostic and clinicopathologic value of PD-L1 in PCa. Methods: We performed a systematic literature search in the PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Web of Science, and SCOPUS databases up to July 21st, 2018. Pooled prevalence of PD-L1 in PCa was calculated using Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation by R software version 3.5.0. The data from the studies were examined by a meta-analysis using Review Manager software 5.3 to calculate pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to estimate the prognostic and clinicopathologic value of PD-L1 in PCa. Heterogeneity was tested by the Chi-squared test and I 2 statistic. Results: Five studies with 2,272 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled prevalence of PD-L1 in PCa was 35% (95% CI 0.32 to 0.37). Both PD-L1 expression (HR = 1.78; 95% CI 1.39 to 2.27; p < 0.00001) and PD-L1 DNA methylation (HR = 2.23; 95% CI 1.51 to 3.29; p < 0.0001) were significantly associated with poor biochemical recurrence-free survival (BCR-FS). PD-L1 tended to have high expression levels in high Gleason score cases (OR = 1.54; 95% CI, 1.17 to 2.03; P = 0.002) and androgen receptor-positive cases (OR = 2.42, 95% CI 1.31 to 4.50; P = 0.005). However, PD-L1 had relatively weak correlation with age, pathologic stage, lymph node metastasis and preoperative PSA level. Conclusions: This meta-analysis confirms the negative prognostic significance of PD-L1 expression and mPD-L1 in PCa patients. Additionally, PD-L1 has a statistically significant correlation with Gleason score and androgen receptor status, while the correlations with age, pathologic stage, lymph node metastasis, and preoperative PSA level were not statistically significant. However, the number of included studies is too small to make the conclusions more convincing, so more retrospective large-cohort studies are expected for the further confirmation of these findings.

Dataset Information

The expression status and prognostic significance of programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 in gastrointestinal tract cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

The expression status and prognostic significance of programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 in gastrointestinal tract cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets