Dataset Information

Diagnostic accuracy study of anorectal manometry for diagnosis of dyssynergic defecation.

ABSTRACT: The diagnostic accuracy of anorectal manometry (AM), which is necessary to diagnose functional defecatory disorders (FDD), is unknown. Using blinded analysis and standardised reporting of diagnostic accuracy, we evaluated whether AM could discriminate between asymptomatic controls and patients with functional constipation (FC).Derived line plots of anorectal pressure profiles during simulated defecation were independently analysed in random order by three expert observers blinded to health status in 85 women with FC and 85 age-matched asymptomatic healthy volunteers (HV). Using accepted criteria, these pressure profiles were characterised as normal (ie, increased rectal pressure coordinated with anal relaxation) or types I-IV dyssynergia. Interobserver agreement and diagnostic accuracy were determined.Blinded consensus-based assessment disclosed a normal pattern in 16/170 (9%) of all participants and only 11/85 (13%) HV. The combined frequency of dyssynergic patterns (I-IV) was very similar in FC (80/85 (94%)) and HV (74/85 (87%)). Type I dyssynergia ('paradoxical' contraction) was less prevalent in FC (17/85 (20%) than in HV (31/85 (36.5%), p=0.03). After statistical correction, only type IV dyssynergia was moderately useful for discriminating between FC (39/85 (46%)) and HV (17/85 (20%)) (p=0.001, positive predictive value=70.0%, positive likelihood ratio=2.3). Interobserver agreement was substantial or moderate for identifying a normal pattern, dyssynergia types I and IV, and FDD, and fair for types II and III.While the interpretation of AM patterns is reproducible, nearly 90% of HV have a pattern that is currently regarded as 'abnormal' by AM. Hence, AM is of limited utility for distinguishing between FC and HV.

SUBMITTER: Grossi U

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4686376 | biostudies-literature | 2016 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Diagnostic accuracy study of anorectal manometry for diagnosis of dyssynergic defecation.

Grossi Ugo U Carrington Emma V EV Bharucha Adil E AE Horrocks Emma J EJ Scott S Mark SM Knowles Charles H CH

Gut 20150312 3

<h4>Objective</h4>The diagnostic accuracy of anorectal manometry (AM), which is necessary to diagnose functional defecatory disorders (FDD), is unknown. Using blinded analysis and standardised reporting of diagnostic accuracy, we evaluated whether AM could discriminate between asymptomatic controls and patients with functional constipation (FC).<h4>Design</h4>Derived line plots of anorectal pressure profiles during simulated defecation were independently analysed in random order by three expert ...[more]

PMID: 25765461

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background & aimsHigh-definition anorectal manometry (HDAM-3D) provides a topographic and 3-dimensional profile of anorectal pressure. We assessed anorectal sensorimotor function and the reproducibility of measurements made with HDAM-3D in healthy adults, and the accuracy of data analysis by its software.MethodsAnal sphincter pressures and rectal sensory thresholds were measured in 78 healthy subjects via placement of a 10-mm rigid probe, with 256 circumferentially arrayed pressure sensors, and a balloon in the rectum. The bearing down maneuver was assessed in a subset of 18 subjects. We compared data analyzed by an expert with findings from automated software analysis. Measurements made in a subset of 16 subjects, 2 weeks apart, were compared to determine reproducibility.ResultsResting, squeezing, and sustained squeezing pressures were significantly higher in men than in women (P < .05); other parameters were similar. Desire and urgency to defecate were similar between men and women, but the maximal tolerable volume was significantly lower in women (P < .05). Older women (>50 years) had significantly lower resting (P < .01) and sustained squeeze pressures (P < .04). Dyssynergic patterns of defecation were observed in 12 of 18 subjects (67%) who attempted to defecate without the 60-mL rectal balloon distention and in 6 of 18 subjects (33%) with the 60-mL rectal balloon distention. Test-retest values correlated (r = 0.81), as did analyses made by an expert vs software analyses of data (r = 0.99).ConclusionsOn the basis of HDAM-3D measurements in healthy adults, anal sphincter pressures are higher in men than in women, but sensory and other parameters are similar; older subjects have weaker sphincters. Many people were found to have dyssynergic patterns of defecation, which could be related to the probe or other technical issues, so this technique may not be suitable for assessing defecation patterns. Measurements made by HDAM-3D are reproducible, and data can be accurately analyzed by its software.

Project description:BackgroundOffice-based biofeedback therapy is effective for constipation with dyssynergic defecation, but must be performed by skilled staff, is only available in selected centres, and requires multiple visits. The efficacy of home-based biofeedback therapy is unknown. We compared clinical and subjective outcomes with home-based and office-based approaches.MethodsIn this randomised controlled trial, eligible patients were adult outpatients (age 18-80 years) who met the Rome III criteria for functional constipation and who had been referred to a tertiary-care centre after non-response to routine management, and who had dyssynergic defecation. Patients were randomly assigned according to a schedule generated in advance by the study biostatistician, in permuted blocks of four, to receive office-based or home-based biofeedback therapy. Office-based biofeedback comprised therapist-guided pelvic floor training for six sessions over 3 months (visits every 2 weeks). Home-based biofeedback comprised 20 min self-training sessions twice per day, in which a self-inserted probe was used to provide visual feedback via a handheld monitoring device of anal sphincter pressure and push effort. Patients recorded in diaries the time of each defecation attempt, stool consistency, straining effort, feeling of incomplete evacuation, need for digital assistance with stooling, and satisfaction with bowel function, from 1 week before enrolment to the end of follow-up. Treatment responders were defined post hoc as those with normalisation of dyssynergic defecation and an increase in the number of complete spontaneous bowel movements per week by 3 months. Cost outcomes calculated from health-care costs and loss of salary were assessed from hospital billing and medical records and questionnaires. Primary outcome measures were the presence of a dyssynergic pattern during attempted defecation, balloon expulsion time, the number of complete spontaneous bowel movements per week, and satisfaction with bowel function, assessed by intention to treat (non-inferiority) and per protocol. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT03202771.FindingsOf 300 patients screened we enrolled 100, from Jan 7, 2005, to Jan 31, 2010. 83 patients completed training (38 [76%] of 50 in the home-based biofeedback group and 45 [90%] of 50 in the office-based biofeedback group). 34 (68%) patients in the home-based group and 35 (70%) in the office-based group were classified as responders. All primary outcomes improved significantly from baseline in the two treatment groups (all p<0·0001). Home-based biofeedback therapy was non-inferior to office-based therapy for number of complete spontaneous bowel movements per week, satisfaction with bowel function, and balloon expulsion time in the intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses, and for dyssynergia in the per-protocol analysis. No adverse events were reported. The median cost of home-based biofeedback therapy was significantly lower than that for office-based treatment (US$1081·70, IQR 794·90-1399·30 vs $1942·50, 1621·70-2369·00, p=0·009).InterpretationHome-based and office-based biofeedback therapy for dyssynergic defecation improved bowel symptoms and physiology with similar efficacy. A home-based programme could substantially broaden the availability and use of this treatment.FundingNational Institutes of Health.

Dataset Information

Diagnostic accuracy study of anorectal manometry for diagnosis of dyssynergic defecation.

Publications

Diagnostic accuracy study of anorectal manometry for diagnosis of dyssynergic defecation.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets