Dataset Information

Factors Associated With Reoperation After Fixation of Displaced Olecranon Fractures.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Surgery for fixation of olecranon fractures is associated with reoperation, mostly for implant removal. A study of a large cohort of patients treated by many different surgeons allows us to determine if specific techniques or implants are associated with a higher rate of reoperation.

Questions/purposes

After open reduction and internal fixation of isolated olecranon fractures, what factors are associated with (1) reoperation and (2) implant removal?

Methods

Three hundred ninety-two adult patients who had operative treatment of a displaced olecranon fracture not associated with other fractures, dislocation, or subluxation at two area hospitals between January 2002 and May 2014 were analyzed to determine factors associated with reoperation. One hundred thirty-eight (35%) patients had plate and screw fixation and 254 (65%) tension band wiring. Nearly 100% of patients with displaced olecranon fractures are currently treated operatively at our hospitals. All patients were followed for at least four months. Two hundred three of the 392 (52%) patients were followed for one year or more. Ninety-nine patients (25%) had a second operation, 92 (93%) at least in part for implant removal (12 for wire migration [3% of all fractures, 12% of reoperations]). We considered patient-related, fracture-related, and implant-related endpoints as possible factors associated with reoperation. With a total sample size of 99 reoperations, an ? of 0.05, and an effect size of 0.3, we had 87% power.

Results

Reoperation was less common in men (36 [36%], women: 63 [64%]; adjusted odds ratio, 0.32; 95% confidence interval, 0.18-0.56; p < 0.001) and older patients (adjusted odds ratio, 0.75; 95% confidence interval, 0.65-0.87; p < 0.001). Similarly, request for implant removal was less in men (33 [36%], women: 59 [64%], adjusted odds ratio, 0.31; 95% confidence interval, 0.18-0.56; p < 0.001) and older patients (adjusted odds ratio, 0.75; 95% confidence interval, 0.65-0.87; p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Patients who have operative fixation of a fracture of the olecranon can be counseled that most patients keep their implants, that only 3% experience implant migration, and that technical factors such as the type or configuration of an implant seem less important than personal factors in determining who requests a second surgery for implant removal.

Level of evidence

Level III, prognostic study.

SUBMITTER: Claessen FM

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4686518 | biostudies-literature | 2016 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Factors Associated With Reoperation After Fixation of Displaced Olecranon Fractures.

Claessen Femke M A P FM Braun Yvonne Y Peters Rinne M RM Dyer George G Doornberg Job N JN Ring David D

Clinical orthopaedics and related research 20150807 1

<h4>Background</h4>Surgery for fixation of olecranon fractures is associated with reoperation, mostly for implant removal. A study of a large cohort of patients treated by many different surgeons allows us to determine if specific techniques or implants are associated with a higher rate of reoperation.<h4>Questions/purposes</h4>After open reduction and internal fixation of isolated olecranon fractures, what factors are associated with (1) reoperation and (2) implant removal?<h4>Methods</h4>Three ...[more]

PMID: 26250137

Similar Datasets

Project description:PURPOSE:Displaced distal radius fractures in children are common and often treated by reduction and cast immobilization. Redisplacement occurs frequently and may be prevented by additional treatment with K-wire fixation after initial reduction. This meta-analysis aims to summarize available literature on this topic and determine if primary K-wire fixation is the preferred treatment for displaced distal radius fractures in children. METHODS:A search in eight databases identified studies that compared cast immobilization alone to additional K-wire fixation as treatment for displaced paediatric distal radius fractures. The primary outcome was the redisplacement rate. Secondary outcomes were secondary reduction rate, range of motion and complications. This meta-analysis was performed according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) statement. RESULTS:Three RCTs and 3 cohort studies, analysing 197 patients treated with cast immobilization alone and 185 with additional K-wire fixation, were included in this meta-analysis. Redisplacement occurred less frequently after additional K-wire fixation than after cast alone (3.8 versus 45.7%; OR 0.07, 95% CI 0.03-0.15). Secondary reduction was performed in 59.8% of the redisplaced fractures. Complications, other than redisplacement, occurred more often after additional K-wire fixation than after cast alone (15.7 versus 3.6%). Range of motion did not differ after both treatments. CONCLUSIONS:Additional K-wire fixation is a suitable treatment to prevent redisplacement and secondary operations after initial reduction of displaced distal radius fractures in children, but is associated with post-procedural complications. Additional K-wire fixation does not result in a better range of motion than cast immobilization alone. More research is needed to identify those patients who will benefit the most from K-wire fixation as a treatment for displaced distal radius fractures in children.

Project description:Of all distal radius fractures, 25 % are complete articular fractures (AO/OTA type C fractures). Two thirds of those fractures are displaced and require reduction. According to several International Guidelines, adequately reduced intra-articular distal radius fractures are best treated non-operatively with plaster immobilisation, while surgical fixation is suggested only when the articular step exceeds 2 mm after reduction. However, these recommendations are based on studies that did not differentiate between intra- and extra-articular distal radius fractures. Thus, no clear consensus about the best treatment for patients with displaced intra-articular distal radius fractures can be reached. Despite the lack of evidence, an increase in internal fixation of intra-articular distal radius fractures has been observed over the last decade. The aim of this study is to determine the difference in functional outcome following open reduction and plate fixation compared with non-operative treatment with closed reduction and plaster immobilisation in patients with a displaced intra articular distal radius fracture.This multicentre randomised controlled trial will randomise between open reduction and internal plate fixation (intervention group) and closed reduction and plaster immobilisation (control group). All consecutive adult patients from 18 to 65 years with a displaced intra-articular distal radius fracture (AO/OTA type C), which has been adequately reduced at the Emergency Department according to the Dutch National Guidelines, are eligible for inclusion in this study. The primary outcome is function and pain of the wrist assessed with the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation score (PRWE). Secondary outcomes are the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score (DASH), pain, quality of life (SF-36), range of motion, grip strength, radiological parameters, complications, crossovers and cost-effectiveness of both treatments. A total of 90 patients will be included in this study.Although displaced intra-articular distal radius fractures are common, there is still no evidence on the optimal treatment for these fractures in patients aged 18 to 65 years. Therefore we aim to determine the difference in functional outcome between open reduction and plate fixation and closed reduction and plaster immobilisation.This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT02651779 ) on January 4(th) 2016.

Project description:PurposeThe purpose of the study is to describe the functional and structural outcomes of the arthroscopic 4-strand, knotless, double-row construct with suture tapes for the surgical treatment of displaced and/or comminuted greater tuberosity fractures of the humerus.MethodsPatients were enrolled between December 2012 and January 2018. The main inclusion criteria were a comminuted and/or displaced tuberosity fracture with a displacement of at least 5 mm in any plane fixed under arthroscopy using a 4-strand, knotless, double-row construct. The technique involves reducing the displaced fragment with 2 medially placed, transtendinous anchors and compressing the greater tuberosity using the tapes from these medial anchors in 2 laterally placed anchors. The exclusion criteria were a fracture that was more than 10 days old at the time of surgery or a history of shoulder surgery and 3- or 4-part fractures. The postoperative rehabilitation protocol was similar for all patients. Constant scores, Quick Dash, return to work and sport, and complications were reported after a minimum follow-up period of 24 months. Bone healing was systematically evaluated on standardized radiographs, including lateral scapula view and anteroposterior views.ResultsTwenty-one patients were enrolled in this study. One patient did not complete the follow-up examination period and thus was excluded, leaving 20 patients in this study. At a median (SD) follow-up of 32 (9) months, the median (SD) Constant score was 94.7 (7.3) points, the median (SD) Quick Dash was 1.7 (4) points, and median (SD) visual analog scale score was 0.5 (1.4). All patients returned to previous work and sport level. No malunions or nonunions were seen. One conversion to open surgery was required for failure of the lateral row during surgery in a 62-year-old woman with osteopenic bone. Two patients experienced complex regional pain syndrome in the postoperative period that resolved after nonoperative treatment.ConclusionsIn this series, the use of arthroscopy combined with the biomechanical properties of knotless double-row constructs contributed to postoperative satisfactory functional results and healing of greater tuberosity fracture. In addition, range of motion was early, and no hardware removal was required. However, care should be taken with osteopenic bone where anchorage can fail.Level of evidenceLevel IV, case series.

Dataset Information

Factors Associated With Reoperation After Fixation of Displaced Olecranon Fractures.

Background

Questions/purposes

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Level of evidence

Publications

Factors Associated With Reoperation After Fixation of Displaced Olecranon Fractures.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure