Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Comparison of genotypic and virtual phenotypic drug resistance interpretations with laboratory-based phenotypes among CRF01_AE and subtype B HIV-infected individuals.


ABSTRACT: HIV drug resistance assessments and interpretations can be obtained from genotyping (GT), virtual phenotyping (VP) and laboratory-based phenotyping (PT). We compared resistance calls obtained from GT and VP with those from PT (GT-PT and VP-PT) among CRF01_AE and subtype B HIV-1 infected patients. GT predictions were obtained from the Stanford HIV database. VP and PT were obtained from Janssen Diagnostics BVBA's vircoType(TM) HIV-1 and Antivirogram®, respectively. With PT assumed as the "gold standard," the area under the curve (AUC) and the Bland-Altman plot were used to assess the level of agreement in resistance interpretations. A total of 80 CRF01_AE samples from Asia and 100 subtype B from Janssen Diagnostics BVBA's database were analysed. CRF01_AE showed discordances ranging from 3 to 27 samples for GT-PT and 1 to 20 samples for VP-PT. The GT-PT and VP-PT AUCs were 0.76-0.97 and 0.81-0.99, respectively. Subtype B showed 3-61 discordances for GT-PT and 2-75 discordances for VP-PT. The AUCs ranged from 0.55 to 0.95 for GT-PT and 0.55 to 0.97 for VP-PT. Didanosine had the highest proportion of discordances and/or AUC in all comparisons. The patient with the largest didanosine FC difference in each subtype harboured Q151M mutation. Overall, GT and VP predictions for CRF01_AE performed significantly better than subtype B for three NRTIs. Although discrepancies exist, GT and VP resistance interpretations in HIV-1 CRF01_AE strains were highly robust in comparison with the gold-standard PT.

SUBMITTER: Jiamsakul A 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4698354 | biostudies-literature | 2016 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Comparison of genotypic and virtual phenotypic drug resistance interpretations with laboratory-based phenotypes among CRF01_AE and subtype B HIV-infected individuals.

Jiamsakul Awachana A   Chaiwarith Romanee R   Durier Nicolas N   Sirivichayakul Sunee S   Kiertiburanakul Sasisopin S   Van Den Eede Peter P   Ditangco Rossana R   Kamarulzaman Adeeba A   Li Patrick C K PC   Ratanasuwan Winai W   Sirisanthana Thira T  

Journal of medical virology 20150717 2


HIV drug resistance assessments and interpretations can be obtained from genotyping (GT), virtual phenotyping (VP) and laboratory-based phenotyping (PT). We compared resistance calls obtained from GT and VP with those from PT (GT-PT and VP-PT) among CRF01_AE and subtype B HIV-1 infected patients. GT predictions were obtained from the Stanford HIV database. VP and PT were obtained from Janssen Diagnostics BVBA's vircoType(TM) HIV-1 and Antivirogram®, respectively. With PT assumed as the "gold sta  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC353763 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC11326245 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7071041 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3887403 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC11351821 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8725829 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6393728 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC2887364 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC1523224 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3648519 | biostudies-literature