Dataset Information

Impact of prolonged assisted ventilation on diaphragmatic efficiency: NAVA versus PSV.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Prolonged controlled mechanical ventilation depresses diaphragmatic efficiency. Assisted modes of ventilation should improve it. We assessed the impact of pressure support ventilation versus neurally adjusted ventilator assist on diaphragmatic efficiency.

Method

Patients previously ventilated with controlled mechanical ventilation for 72 hours or more were randomized to be ventilated for 48 hours with pressure support ventilation (n =12) or neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (n = 13). Neuro-ventilatory efficiency (tidal volume/diaphragmatic electrical activity) and neuro-mechanical efficiency (pressure generated against the occluded airways/diaphragmatic electrical activity) were measured during three spontaneous breathing trials (0, 24 and 48 hours). Breathing pattern, diaphragmatic electrical activity and pressure time product of the diaphragm were assessed every 4 hours.

Results

In patients randomized to neurally adjusted ventilator assist, neuro-ventilatory efficiency increased from 27 ± 19 ml/?V at baseline to 62 ± 30 ml/?V at 48 hours (p <0.0001) and neuro-mechanical efficiency increased from 1 ± 0.6 to 2.6 ± 1.1 cmH2O/?V (p = 0.033). In patients randomized to pressure support ventilation, these did not change. Electrical activity of the diaphragm, neural inspiratory time, pressure time product of the diaphragm and variability of the breathing pattern were significantly higher in patients ventilated with neurally adjusted ventilatory assist. The asynchrony index was 9.48 [6.38- 21.73] in patients ventilated with pressure support ventilation and 5.39 [3.78- 8.36] in patients ventilated with neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (p = 0.04).

Conclusion

After prolonged controlled mechanical ventilation, neurally adjusted ventilator assist improves diaphragm efficiency whereas pressure support ventilation does not.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov study registration: NCT02473172, 06/11/2015.

SUBMITTER: Di Mussi R

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4700777 | biostudies-literature | 2016 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Impact of prolonged assisted ventilation on diaphragmatic efficiency: NAVA versus PSV.

Di Mussi Rosa R Spadaro Savino S Mirabella Lucia L Volta Carlo Alberto CA Serio Gabriella G Staffieri Francesco F Dambrosio Michele M Cinnella Gilda G Bruno Francesco F Grasso Salvatore S

Critical care (London, England) 20160105

<h4>Background</h4>Prolonged controlled mechanical ventilation depresses diaphragmatic efficiency. Assisted modes of ventilation should improve it. We assessed the impact of pressure support ventilation versus neurally adjusted ventilator assist on diaphragmatic efficiency.<h4>Method</h4>Patients previously ventilated with controlled mechanical ventilation for 72 hours or more were randomized to be ventilated for 48 hours with pressure support ventilation (n =12) or neurally adjusted ventilatory ...[more]

PMID: 26728475

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundShort-term mechanical ventilation (MV) protects against sepsis-induced diaphragmatic dysfunction. Prolonged MV induces diaphragmatic dysfunction in non-septic animals, but few reports describe the effects of prolonged MV in sepsis. We hypothesized that prolonged MV is not protective but worsens the diaphragmatic dysfunction induced by a mild sepsis, because MV and sepsis share key signaling mechanisms, such as cytokine upregulation.MethodWe studied the impact of prolonged MV (12 h) in four groups (n = 8) of male Wistar rats: 1) endotoxemia induced by intraperitoneal injection of Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide, 2) MV without endotoxemia, 3) combination of endotoxemia and MV and 4) sham control. Diaphragm mechanical performance, pro-inflammatory cytokine concentrations (Tumor Necrosis Factor-?, Interleukin-1?, Interleukin-6) in plasma were measured.ResultsProlonged MV and sepsis independtly reduced maximum diaphragm force (-27%, P = 0.003; -37%, P<0.001; respectively). MV and sepsis acted additively to further decrease diaphragm force (-62%, P<0.001). Similar results were observed for diaphragm kinetics (maximum lengthening velocity -47%, P<0.001). Sepsis and MV reduced diaphragm cross sectional area of type I and IIx fibers, which was further increased by the combination of sepsis and MV (all P<0.05). Sepsis and MV were individually associated with the presence of a robust perimysial inflammatory infiltrate, which was more marked when sepsis and MV were both present (all P<0.05). Sepsis and, to a lesser extent, MV increased proinflammatory cytokine production in plasma and diaphragm (all P<0.05); proinflammatory cytokine expression in plasma was increased further by the combination of sepsis and MV (all P<0.05). Maximum diaphragm force correlated negatively with plasma and diaphragmatic cytokine production (all p<0.05).ConclusionsProlonged (12 h) MV exacerbated sepsis-induced decrease in diaphragm performance. Systemic and diaphragmatic overproduction of pro-inflammatory cytokines may contribute to diaphragm weakness.

Project description:BACKGROUND:Diaphragm atrophy and dysfunction are consequences of mechanical ventilation and are determinants of clinical outcomes. We hypothesize that partial preservation of diaphragm function, such as during assisted modes of ventilation, will restore diaphragm thickness. We also aim to correlate the changes in diaphragm thickness and function to outcomes and clinical factors. METHODS:This is a prospective, multicentre, observational study. Patients mechanically ventilated for more than 48 h in controlled mode and eventually switched to assisted ventilation were enrolled. Diaphragm ultrasound and clinical data collection were performed every 48 h until discharge or death. A threshold of 10% was used to define thinning during controlled and recovery of thickness during assisted ventilation. Patients were also classified based on the level of diaphragm activity during assisted ventilation. We evaluated the association between changes in diaphragm thickness and activity and clinical outcomes and data, such as ventilation parameters. RESULTS:Sixty-two patients ventilated in controlled mode and then switched to the assisted mode of ventilation were enrolled. Diaphragm thickness significantly decreased during controlled ventilation (1.84 ± 0.44 to 1.49 ± 0.37 mm, p < 0.001) and was partially restored during assisted ventilation (1.49 ± 0.37 to 1.75 ± 0.43 mm, p < 0.001). A diaphragm thinning of more than 10% was associated with longer duration of controlled ventilation (10 [5, 15] versus 5 [4, 8.5] days, p = 0.004) and higher PEEP levels (12.6 ± 4 versus 10.4 ± 4 cmH2O, p = 0.034). An increase in diaphragm thickness of more than 10% during assisted ventilation was not associated with any clinical outcome but with lower respiratory rate (16.7 ± 3.2 versus 19.2 ± 4 bpm, p = 0.019) and Rapid Shallow Breathing Index (37 ± 11 versus 44 ± 13, p = 0.029) and with higher Pressure Muscle Index (2 [0.5, 3] versus 0.4 [0, 1.9], p = 0.024). Change in diaphragm thickness was not related to diaphragm function expressed as diaphragm thickening fraction. CONCLUSION:Mode of ventilation affects diaphragm thickness, and preservation of diaphragmatic contraction, as during assisted modes, can partially reverse the muscle atrophy process. Avoiding a strenuous inspiratory work, as measured by Rapid Shallow Breathing Index and Pressure Muscle Index, may help diaphragm thickness restoration.

Project description:NIV-NAVA mode for respiratory support in preterm infants is not well-studied. This study aimed to describe the diaphragmatic function, diaphragmatic excursion (DE), and thickness fraction (DTF), in preterm infants < 30 weeks' gestation supported by NIV-NAVA compared to NIPPV using bedside ultrasonography. In this consecutive prospective study, DE, diaphragmatic thickness at end of expiration (DTexp), end of inspiration (DTins), and DTF were assessed using bedside ultrasound. Lung aeration evaluation using lung ultrasound score (LUS) was performed for the two groups. Diaphragmatic measurements and LUS were compared for the 2 groups (NIV-NAVA group versus NIPPV group). Statistical analyses were conducted using the SPSS software version 22. Out of 70 infants evaluated, 40 were enrolled. Twenty infants were on NIV-NAVA and 20 infants on NIPPV with a mean [SD] study age of 25.7 [0.9] weeks and 25.1 [1.4] weeks respectively (p = 0.15). Baseline characteristics and respiratory parameters at the time of the scan showed no significant difference between groups. DE was significantly higher in NIV-NAVA with a mean SD of 4.7 (1.5) mm versus 3.5 (0.9) mm in NIPPV, p = 0.007. Additionally, the mean (SD) of DTF for the NIV-NAVA group was 81.6 (30) % vs 78.2 (27) % for the NIPPV group [p = 0.71]. Both groups showed relatively high LUS but no significant difference between groups [12.8 (2.6) vs 12.6 (2.6), p = 0.8]. Conclusion: Preterm infants managed with NIV-NAVA showed significantly higher DE compared to those managed on NIPPV. This study raises the hypothesis that NIV-NAVA could potentially improve diaphragmatic function due to its synchronization with patients' own breathing. Longitudinal studies to assess diaphragmatic function over time are needed. Trial registry: Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05079412). Date of registration September 30, 2021. What is Known: • NIV-NAVA utilizes diaphragmatic electrical activity to provide synchronized breathing support. • Evidence for the effect of NIV-NAVA on diaphragmatic thickness fraction (DTF) and excursion (DE) is limited. What is New: • Ultrasonographic assessment of diaphragmatic function (DTF and DE) is feasible. • In preterm infants, DE was significantly higher in infants supported with NIV-NAVA compared to those supported with NIPPV.

Project description:Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist (NAVA) is a mode of assisted mechanical ventilation that delivers inspiratory pressure proportionally to the electrical activity of the diaphragm. To date, no pediatric study has focused on the effects of NAVA on hemodynamic parameters. This physiologic study with a randomized cross-over design compared hemodynamic parameters when NAVA or conventional ventilation (CV) was applied.After a baseline period, infants received NAVA and CV in a randomized order during two consecutive 30-min periods. During the last 10 min of each period, respiratory and hemodynamic parameters were collected. No changes in PEEP, FiO2, sedation or inotropic doses were allowed during these two periods. The challenge was to keep minute volumes constant, with no changes in blood CO2 levels and in pH that may affect the results.Six infants who had undergone cardiac surgery (mean age 7.8?±?4.1 months) were studied after parental consent. Four of them had low central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO2?<?65 %). The ventilatory settings resulted in similar minute volumes (1.7?±?0.4 vs. 1.6?±?0.6 ml/kg, P?=?0.67) and in similar tidal volumes respectively with NAVA and with CV. There were no statistically significant differences on blood pH levels between the two modes of ventilation (7.32?±?0.02 vs. 7.32?±?0.04, P?=?0.34). Ventilation with NAVA delivered lower peak inspiratory pressures than with CV: -32.7 % (95 % CI: -48.2 to -17.1 %, P?=?0.04). With regard to hemodynamics, systolic arterial pressures were higher using NAVA: +8.4 % (95 % CI: +3.3 to +13.6 %, P?=?0.03). There were no statistically significant differences on cardiac index between the two modes of ventilation. However, all children with a low baseline ScvO2 (<65 %) tended to increase their cardiac index with NAVA compared to CV: 2.03?±?0.30 vs. 1.91?±?0.39 L/min.m2 (median?±?interquartile, P?=?0.07).This pilot study raises the hypothesis that NAVA could have beneficial effects on hemodynamics in children when compared to a conventional ventilatory mode that delivered identical PEEP and similar minute volumes.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01490710 . Date of registration: December 7, 2011.

Dataset Information

Impact of prolonged assisted ventilation on diaphragmatic efficiency: NAVA versus PSV.

Background

Method

Results

Conclusion

Trial registration

Publications

Impact of prolonged assisted ventilation on diaphragmatic efficiency: NAVA versus PSV.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets