Dataset Information

Treatment for mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

ABSTRACT:

Background

The effectiveness of treatments for mild cognitive impairment is uncertain. The aim of this review was to evaluate the effectiveness and harms of treatment for mild cognitive impairment in adults 65 years of age and older.

Methods

We searched MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Central (December 2012-December 2014); citations from 2 systematic reviews were considered for inclusion. We included randomized controlled trials involving community-dwelling adults aged 65 years and older with a diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment. Studies reporting on cognition, function, behaviour, global status, mortality and adverse events for treatment with pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic interventions were included.

Results

Seventeen studies were included. Cholinesterase inhibitor studies evaluating cognition (Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale, cognition subscale) showed no difference between intervention and control groups (mean difference [MD] -0.33, 95% CI -0.73 to 0.06]; one behavioural study showed no significant effect on cognition (Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale, cognition subscale) for the intervention group when compared to controls (MD -0.60, (95% CI -1.44 to 0.24), and one study on vitamin E showed no difference between intervention and control groups (MD 0.85, 95% CI -0.32 to 2.02). With the Mini-Mental State Examination, cholinesterase inhibitors showed no difference between intervention and control groups (MD 0.17, 95% CI -0.13 to 0.47); behavioural studies showed a significant difference favouring intervention (MD 1.01, 95% CI 0.25 to 1.77), and studies of dietary supplements and/or vitamins showed no difference between intervention and control groups (MD 0.20, 95% CI -0.04 to 0.43). Pharmacologic studies showed no difference in serious adverse events (risk ratio 0.98, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.10). No serious adverse events were reported for nonpharmacologic interventions.

Interpretation

Treatment of mild cognitive impairment with cholinesterase inhibitors showed no benefit when compared with a control group. A small cognitive benefit was observed using behavioural therapies when compared with the control group. However, the clinical significance of this small benefit remains uncertain. The current evidence does not support the use of cholinesterase inhibitors for treating mild cognitive impairment, and future high-quality research using a standardized approach is needed to affirm the finding of a small benefit on cognition that was observed for behavioural interventions.

Registration

PROSPERO no. CRD42014015431.

SUBMITTER: Fitzpatrick-Lewis D

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4701654 | biostudies-literature | 2015 Oct-Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Treatment for mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Fitzpatrick-Lewis Donna D Warren Rachel R Ali Muhammad Usman MU Sherifali Diana D Raina Parminder P

CMAJ open 20151001 4

<h4>Background</h4>The effectiveness of treatments for mild cognitive impairment is uncertain. The aim of this review was to evaluate the effectiveness and harms of treatment for mild cognitive impairment in adults 65 years of age and older.<h4>Methods</h4>We searched MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Central (December 2012-December 2014); citations from 2 systematic reviews were considered for inclusion. We included randomized controlled trials involving community-dwelling adults aged 65 years and o ...[more]

PMID: 26770964

Similar Datasets

Project description:Purpose: The use of optical coherence tomography (OCT) of the retina to detect inner retinal degeneration is being investigated as a potential biomarker for mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer's disease (AD), and an overwhelming body of evidence indicates that discovery of disease-modifying treatments for AD should be aimed at the pre-dementia clinical stage of AD, i.e., MCI. We aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis on retinal OCT in MCI. Methods: We performed a systematic review of the English literature in three databases (PubMed, Embase, and Latindex) for studies that measured retinal thickness using OCT in people with MCI and healthy controls, age 50 or older, between 1 January 2000 and 31 July 2019. Only cohort and case-control studies were reviewed, and independent extraction of quality data and established objective data was performed. We calculated the effect size for studies in the review that met the following criteria: (1) a statistically significant difference between MCI subjects and normal controls for several OCT variables, (2) use of spectral domain OCT, and (3) use of APOSTEL recommendations for OCT reporting. Weighted Hedges' g statistic was used to calculate the pooled effect size for four variables: ganglion cell layer-inner plexiform layer (GCL-IPL) complex thickness in micrometers (μm), circumpapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (pRNFL) thickness in μm, macular thickness in μm, and macular volume in μm3. For variables with high heterogeneity, a multivariate meta-regression was performed. We followed the PRISMA guidelines for systematic reviews. Results: Fifteen articles met the inclusion criteria. A total of 58.9% of MCI patients had statistically significant thinning of the pRNFL compared with normal subjects, while 61.6% of all MCI patients who had macular volume measured had a statistically significant reduction in volume compared with controls, and 50.0% of the macular GCL-IPL complexes measured demonstrated significant thinning in MCI compared with normal controls. Meta-analysis demonstrated a large effect size for decreased macular thickness in MCI subjects compared with normal controls, but there was a substantial heterogeneity for macular thickness results. The other variables did not demonstrate a significant difference and also had substantial heterogeneity. Meta-regression analysis did not reveal an explanation for the heterogeneity. Conclusions: A better understanding of the cause of retina degeneration and longitudinal, standardized studies are needed to determine if optical coherence tomography can be used as a biomarker for mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer's disease.

Project description:BackgroundThere is insufficient evidence to support the use of acupuncture for mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and there is no consensus on its efficacy. This review aimed to determine the acupuncture effect in patients with MCI.MethodsRelevant and potentially eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of acupuncture for MCI were obtained from four Chinese databases, four English databases, and additional resources up to 1 August 2022. The primary outcome was the improvement in overall cognitive function (OCF). Secondary outcomes were improved memory function (MF) and activities of daily living (ADLs). The revised Cochrane collaboration risk of bias (ROB) assessment tool (ROB 2.0) was applied to evaluate their methodological quality. The Review Manager software v 5.4 was used for analyses. Trial sequential analysis (TSA) 0.9.5.10 β software was used to estimate the required sample size and test the reliability of the pooled outcome. The quality of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) tool.ResultsThis meta-analysis included 11 RCTs with a total of 602 patients. The methodological quality of all trials was moderate. Low-quality evidence showed that acupuncture significantly improved OCF (Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE): mean difference (MD) = 1.22, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.78-1.66; the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale (MoCA): MD = 1.22, 95% CI: 0.47-1.97). In subgroup analyses, it was revealed that acupuncture significantly increased OCF in patients with MCI when compared to conventional medicine (CM) and sham acupuncture (SA). TSA's findings indicated that the evidence of improving OCF with acupuncture for patients with MCI was conclusive. Meanwhile, there is no statistical difference in the improvement of MF and ADL between acupuncture and CM. TSA showed that the evidence of improving MF and ADL for patients who had MCI and received acupuncture was inconclusive. The shreds of evidence of improving MF and ADL were ranked from low to critically low.ConclusionAcupuncture appears to be an effective clinical application method for improving OCF in patients with MCI. However, due to low-quality evidence, more relevant and high-quality research is needed in this field.Systematic review registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021291284, PROSPERO, No. CRD42021291284.

Project description:BackgroundMild cognitive impairment (MCI) is the stage between the expected cognitive decline of normal aging and the more serious decline of dementia. Previous studies have shown that regular exercise can improve cognition and physical performance in older adults. Walking is a low-technology and low-cost exercise that has been proven to improve cognition and mobility in healthy elderly individuals. However, no systematic review or meta-analysis has explored whether walking can improve cognitive function in older adults with MCI. This study aimed to explore the effects of walking interventions on cognitive functions in individuals with MCI.MethodsIn accordance with the PRISMA guidelines, MEDLINE, PubMed, SPORTDiscus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CINAHL, Web of Science, Airiti Library, and the National Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations in Taiwan were searched from inception to July 2023. Independent reviewers selected randomized clinical trials (RCT) that compared the effects of walking with no intervention or other exercises in individuals with MCI. The primary outcomes were cognitive functions, and the secondary outcome was walking endurance. Three reviewers independently conducted data extraction. The risk of bias was assessed using the Revised Cochrane Risk of Bias assessment tool.ResultsFourteen RCTs were included in this review. The quality of evidence in these studies was rated as good to excellent. The results of the meta-analysis showed that the individuals with MCI had no significant improvement in cognitive function but had significant improvement in the 6-min walk test (Mean Difference=23.70, p=0.008) after walking interventions compared to no intervention or other exercises.ConclusionWalking intervention has no significant improvement on cognitive functions in older adults with MCI. However, walking induces beneficial effects on aerobic capacity.Trial registrationThis systematic review has the registration number CRD42021283753 on PROSPERO.

Dataset Information

Treatment for mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background

Methods

Results

Interpretation

Registration

Publications

Treatment for mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets