Dataset Information

A comprehensive benchmarking study of protocols and sequencing platforms for 16S rRNA community profiling.

ABSTRACT: In the last 5 years, the rapid pace of innovations and improvements in sequencing technologies has completely changed the landscape of metagenomic and metagenetic experiments. Therefore, it is critical to benchmark the various methodologies for interrogating the composition of microbial communities, so that we can assess their strengths and limitations. The most common phylogenetic marker for microbial community diversity studies is the 16S ribosomal RNA gene and in the last 10 years the field has moved from sequencing a small number of amplicons and samples to more complex studies where thousands of samples and multiple different gene regions are interrogated.We assembled 2 synthetic communities with an even (EM) and uneven (UM) distribution of archaeal and bacterial strains and species, as metagenomic control material, to assess performance of different experimental strategies. The 2 synthetic communities were used in this study, to highlight the limitations and the advantages of the leading sequencing platforms: MiSeq (Illumina), The Pacific Biosciences RSII, 454 GS-FLX/+ (Roche), and IonTorrent (Life Technologies). We describe an extensive survey based on synthetic communities using 3 experimental designs (fusion primers, universal tailed tag, ligated adaptors) across the 9 hypervariable 16S rDNA regions. We demonstrate that library preparation methodology can affect data interpretation due to different error and chimera rates generated during the procedure. The observed community composition was always biased, to a degree that depended on the platform, sequenced region and primer choice. However, crucially, our analysis suggests that 16S rRNA sequencing is still quantitative, in that relative changes in abundance of taxa between samples can be recovered, despite these biases.We have assessed a range of experimental conditions across several next generation sequencing platforms using the most up-to-date configurations. We propose that the choice of sequencing platform and experimental design needs to be taken into consideration in the early stage of a project by running a small trial consisting of several hypervariable regions to quantify the discriminatory power of each region. We also suggest that the use of a synthetic community as a positive control would be beneficial to identify the potential biases and procedural drawbacks that may lead to data misinterpretation. The results of this study will serve as a guideline for making decisions on which experimental condition and sequencing platform to consider to achieve the best microbial profiling.

SUBMITTER: D'Amore R

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4712552 | biostudies-literature | 2016 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

A comprehensive benchmarking study of protocols and sequencing platforms for 16S rRNA community profiling.

D'Amore Rosalinda R Ijaz Umer Zeeshan UZ Schirmer Melanie M Kenny John G JG Gregory Richard R Darby Alistair C AC Shakya Migun M Podar Mircea M Quince Christopher C Hall Neil N

BMC genomics 20160114

<h4>Background</h4>In the last 5 years, the rapid pace of innovations and improvements in sequencing technologies has completely changed the landscape of metagenomic and metagenetic experiments. Therefore, it is critical to benchmark the various methodologies for interrogating the composition of microbial communities, so that we can assess their strengths and limitations. The most common phylogenetic marker for microbial community diversity studies is the 16S ribosomal RNA gene and in the last 1 ...[more]

PMID: 26763898

Similar Datasets

Project description:Introduction:Microbiome research based on high-throughput sequencing has grown exponentially in recent years, but methodological variations can easily undermine the reproducibility across studies. Objectives:To systematically evaluate the comparability of sequencing results of 16S rRNA gene sequencing (16Ss)- and shotgun metagenomic sequencing (SMs)-based microbial community profiling in laboratories under routine conditions. Methods:We designed a multicenter study across 35 participating laboratories in China using designed mock communities and homogenized fecal samples. Results:A wide range of practices and approaches was reported by the participating laboratories. The observed microbial compositions of the mock communities in 46.2% (12/26) of the 16Ss and 82.6% (19/23) of the SMs laboratories had significant correlations with the expected result (Spearman r>0.59, P <0.05). The results from laboratories with near-identical protocols showed slight interlaboratory deviations. However, a high degree of interlaboratory deviation was found in the observed abundances of specific taxa, such as Bacteroides spp. (range: 0.3%-53.5%), Enterococci spp. (range: 0.8%-43.9%) and Fusobacterium spp. (range: 0.1%-39.8%). SMs performed better than 16Ss in detecting low-abundance bacteria (B. bifidum). The differences in DNA extraction methods, amplified regions and bioinformatics analysis tools (taxonomic classifiers and database) were important factors causing interlaboratory deviations. Addressing laboratory contamination is an urgent task because various sources of unexpected microbes were found in negative control samples. Conclusions:Well-defined control samples, such as the mock communities in this study, should be routinely used in microbiome research for monitoring potential biases. The findings in this study will provide guidance in the choice of more reasonable operating procedures to minimize potential methodological biases in revealing human microbiota composition.

Project description:The 16S rRNA gene works as a rapid and effective marker for the identification of microorganisms in complex communities; hence, a huge number of microbiomes have been surveyed by 16S amplicon-based sequencing. The resolution of the 16S rRNA gene is always considered only at the genus level; however, it has not been verified on a wide range of microbes yet. To fully explore the ability and potential of the 16S rRNA gene in microbial profiling, here, we propose Qscore, a comprehensive method to evaluate the performance of amplicons by integrating the amplification rate, multitier taxonomic annotation, sequence type, and length. Our in silico assessment by a "global view" of 35,889 microbe species across multiple reference databases summarizes the optimal sequencing strategy for 16S short reads. On the other hand, since microbes are unevenly distributed according to their habitats, we also provide the recommended configuration for 16 typical ecosystems based on the Qscores of 157,390 microbiomes in the Microbiome Search Engine (MSE). Detailed data simulation further proves that the 16S amplicons produced with Qscore-suggested parameters exhibit high precision in microbiome profiling, which is close to that of shotgun metagenomes under CAMI metrics. Therefore, by reconsidering the precision of 16S-based microbiome profiling, our work not only enables the high-quality reusability of massive sequence legacy that has already been produced but is also significant for guiding microbiome studies in the future. We have implemented the Qscore as an online service at http://qscore.single-cell.cn to parse the recommended sequencing strategy for specific habitats or expected microbial structures. IMPORTANCE 16S rRNA has long been used as a biomarker to identify distinct microbes from complex communities. However, due to the influence of the amplification region, sequencing type, sequence processing, and reference database, the accuracy of 16S rRNA has not been fully verified on a global range. More importantly, the microbial composition of different habitats varies greatly, and it is necessary to adopt different strategies according to the corresponding target microbes to achieve optimal analytical performance. Here, we developed Qscore, which evaluates the comprehensive performance of 16S amplicons from multiple perspectives, thus providing the best sequencing strategies for common ecological environments by using big data.

Project description:BackgroundSequential membrane filtration as a pre-processing step for capturing sediment-associated microorganisms could provide good quality and integrity DNA that can be preserved and kept at ambient temperatures before community profiling through culture-independent molecular techniques. However, the effects of sample pre-processing via filtration on DNA-based profiling of sediment-associated microbial community diversity and composition are poorly understood. Specifically, the influences of pre-processing on the quality and quantity of extracted DNA, high-throughput DNA sequencing reads, and detected microbial taxa need further evaluation.ResultsWe assessed the impact of pre-processing freshwater sediment samples by sequential membrane filtration (from 10, 5 to 0.22 μm pore size) for 16S rRNA-based community profiling of sediment-associated microorganisms. Specifically, we examined if there would be method-driven differences between non- and pre-processed sediment samples regarding the quality and quantity of extracted DNA, PCR amplicon, resulting high-throughput sequencing reads, microbial diversity, and community composition. We found no significant difference in the qualities and quantities of extracted DNA and PCR amplicons, and the read abundance after bioinformatics processing (i.e., denoising and chimeric-read filtering steps) between the two methods. Although the non- and pre-processed sediment samples had more unique than shared amplicon sequence variants (ASVs), we report that their shared ASVs accounted for 74% of both methods' absolute read abundance. More so, at the genus level, the final collection filter identified most of the genera (95% of the reads) captured from the non-processed samples, with a total of 51 false-negative (2%) and 59 false-positive genera (3%). We demonstrate that while there were differences in shared and unique taxa, both methods revealed comparable microbial diversity and community composition.ConclusionsOur observations highlight the feasibility of pre-processing sediment samples for community analysis and the need to further assess sampling strategies to help conceptualize appropriate study designs for sediment-associated microbial community profiling.

Dataset Information

A comprehensive benchmarking study of protocols and sequencing platforms for 16S rRNA community profiling.

Publications

A comprehensive benchmarking study of protocols and sequencing platforms for 16S rRNA community profiling.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets