Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Improving power and accuracy of genome-wide association studies via a multi-locus mixed linear model methodology.


ABSTRACT: Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have been widely used in genetic dissection of complex traits. However, common methods are all based on a fixed-SNP-effect mixed linear model (MLM) and single marker analysis, such as efficient mixed model analysis (EMMA). These methods require Bonferroni correction for multiple tests, which often is too conservative when the number of markers is extremely large. To address this concern, we proposed a random-SNP-effect MLM (RMLM) and a multi-locus RMLM (MRMLM) for GWAS. The RMLM simply treats the SNP-effect as random, but it allows a modified Bonferroni correction to be used to calculate the threshold p value for significance tests. The MRMLM is a multi-locus model including markers selected from the RMLM method with a less stringent selection criterion. Due to the multi-locus nature, no multiple test correction is needed. Simulation studies show that the MRMLM is more powerful in QTN detection and more accurate in QTN effect estimation than the RMLM, which in turn is more powerful and accurate than the EMMA. To demonstrate the new methods, we analyzed six flowering time related traits in Arabidopsis thaliana and detected more genes than previous reported using the EMMA. Therefore, the MRMLM provides an alternative for multi-locus GWAS.

SUBMITTER: Wang SB 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4726296 | biostudies-literature | 2016 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Improving power and accuracy of genome-wide association studies via a multi-locus mixed linear model methodology.

Wang Shi-Bo SB   Feng Jian-Ying JY   Ren Wen-Long WL   Huang Bo B   Zhou Ling L   Wen Yang-Jun YJ   Zhang Jin J   Dunwell Jim M JM   Xu Shizhong S   Zhang Yuan-Ming YM  

Scientific reports 20160120


Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have been widely used in genetic dissection of complex traits. However, common methods are all based on a fixed-SNP-effect mixed linear model (MLM) and single marker analysis, such as efficient mixed model analysis (EMMA). These methods require Bonferroni correction for multiple tests, which often is too conservative when the number of markers is extremely large. To address this concern, we proposed a random-SNP-effect MLM (RMLM) and a multi-locus RMLM (MRM  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC6054291 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC2982824 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3386481 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC2931336 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4211878 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC4230738 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4143695 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7236949 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6781134 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6341767 | biostudies-literature