Empagliflozin as adjunct to insulin in patients with type 1 diabetes: a 4-week, randomized, placebo-controlled trial (EASE-1).
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Pieber TR
PROVIDER: S-EPMC4745028 | biostudies-literature | 2015 Oct
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:AIMS:This phase 2, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02702011) with 4 sites in Japan investigated the pharmacodynamics (PD), pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety profile of empagliflozin in Japanese participants with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) as adjunctive therapy to insulin. MATERIALS AND METHODS:Participants using multiple daily injections of insulin for ?12 months, with HbA1c of 7.5%-10.0%, entered a 2-week, open-label, placebo run-in period, followed by a 4-week, double-blind period during which participants were randomized 1:1:1:1 to receive empagliflozin 2.5 mg (n = 13), empagliflozin 10 mg (n = 12), empagliflozin 25 mg (n = 12) or placebo (n = 11). The primary objective was to assess the effect of empagliflozin vs placebo on urinary glucose excretion (UGE) after 7 days of treatment. RESULTS:PD: Empagliflozin resulted in a dose-dependent significant increase in 24-hour UGE compared with placebo (UGE placebo-corrected mean [95% confidence interval] change from baseline: 2.5 mg, 65.10 [43.29, 86.90] g/24 h; 10 mg, 81.19 [58.80, 103.58] g/24 h; 25 mg, 98.11 [75.91, 120.31] g/24 h). After 4 weeks of treatment, UGE increase was associated with improved glycaemic control, reduced body weight and decreased insulin needs. Empagliflozin treatment also resulted in dose-dependent increases in serum ketone bodies and free fatty acids. PK: Plasma empagliflozin levels increased in a dose-dependent manner and peaked at 1.5 hours. In this short study, empagliflozin was well tolerated, with no increase in rate of hypoglycaemia and no diabetic ketoacidosis events reported. CONCLUSIONS:Based on this short-duration phase 2 study, the PK/PD profile of empagliflozin in Japanese participants with T1DM is comparable to that of non-Japanese participants.
| S-EPMC6099358 | biostudies-literature
Project description:AimsTo investigate the efficacy and tolerability of empagliflozin added to basal insulin-treated type 2 diabetes.MethodsPatients inadequately controlled [glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) >7 to ≤10% (>53 to ≤86 mmol/mol)] on basal insulin (glargine, detemir, NPH) were randomized to empagliflozin 10 mg (n = 169), empagliflozin 25 mg (n = 155) or placebo (n = 170) for 78 weeks. The baseline characteristics were balanced among the groups [mean HbA1c 8.2% (67 mmol/mol), BMI 32.2 kg/m(2) ]. The basal insulin dose was to remain constant for 18 weeks, then could be adjusted at investigator's discretion. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in HbA1c at week 18. Key secondary endpoints were changes from baseline in HbA1c and insulin dose at week 78.ResultsAt week 18, the adjusted mean ± standard error changes from baseline in HbA1c were 0.0 ± 0.1% (-0.1 ± 0.8 mmol/mol) for placebo, compared with -0.6 ± 0.1% (-6.2 ± 0.8 mmol/mol) and -0.7 ± 0.1% (-7.8 ± 0.8 mmol/mol) for empagliflozin 10 and 25 mg, respectively (both p < 0.001). At week 78, empagliflozin 10 and 25 mg significantly reduced HbA1c, insulin dose and weight vs placebo (all p < 0.01), and empagliflozin 10 mg significantly reduced systolic blood pressure vs placebo (p = 0.004). Similar percentages of patients had confirmed hypoglycaemia in all groups (35-36%). Events consistent with urinary tract infection were reported in 9, 15 and 12% of patients on placebo, empagliflozin 10 and 25 mg, and events consistent with genital infection were reported in 2, 8 and 5%, respectively.ConclusionsEmpagliflozin for 78 weeks added to basal insulin improved glycaemic control and reduced weight with a similar risk of hypoglycaemia to placebo.
| S-EPMC5034797 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectiveTo assess whether low doses of empagliflozin as adjunct to hybrid closed-loop therapy improve glycemia compared with placebo in adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D) who are not able to achieve targets with the system alone.Research design and methodsA double-blind crossover randomized controlled trial was performed in adults with suboptimally controlled T1D (HbA1c 7.0-10.5%) who were not able to achieve a target time in range (3.9-10.0 mmol/L) ≥70% after 14 days of hybrid closed-loop therapy. Three 14-day interventions were performed with placebo, 2.5 mg empagliflozin, or 5 mg empagliflozin as adjunct to the McGill artificial pancreas. Participants were assigned at a 1:1:1:1:1:1 ratio with blocked randomization. The primary outcome was time in range (3.9-10.0 mmol/L). Analysis was by intention to treat, and a P value <0.05 was regarded as significant.ResultsA total of 24 participants completed the study (50% male; age 33 ± 14 years; HbA1c 8.1 ± 0.5%). The time in range was 59.0 ± 9.0% for placebo, 71.6 ± 9.7% for 2.5 mg empagliflozin, and 70.2 ± 8.0% for 5 mg empagliflozin (P < 0.0001 between 2.5 mg empagliflozin and placebo and between 5 mg empagliflozin and placebo). Mean daily capillary ketone levels were not different between arms. There were no serious adverse events or cases of diabetic ketoacidosis or severe hypoglycemia in any intervention.ConclusionsEmpagliflozin at 2.5 and 5 mg increased time in range during hybrid closed-loop therapy by 11-13 percentage points compared with placebo in those who otherwise were unable to attain glycemic targets. Future studies are required to assess long-term efficacy and safety.
| S-EPMC9797647 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectiveTo investigate the efficacy and tolerability of empagliflozin as add-on to metformin and sulfonylurea in patients with type 2 diabetes.Research design and methodsPatients inadequately controlled on metformin and sulfonylurea (HbA1c ≥7 to ≤10%) were randomized and treated with once-daily empagliflozin 10 mg (n = 225), empagliflozin 25 mg (n = 216), or placebo (n = 225) for 24 weeks. The primary end point was change from baseline in HbA1c at week 24. Key secondary end points were changes from baseline in weight and mean daily glucose (MDG) at week 24.ResultsAt week 24, adjusted mean (SE) changes from baseline in HbA1c were -0.17% (0.05) for placebo vs. -0.82% (0.05) and -0.77% (0.05) for empagliflozin 10 and 25 mg, respectively (both P < 0.001). Empagliflozin significantly reduced MDG, weight, and systolic (but not diastolic) blood pressure versus placebo. Adverse events were reported in 62.7, 67.9, and 64.1% of patients on placebo and empagliflozin 10 and 25 mg, respectively. Events consistent with urinary tract infection were reported in 8.0, 10.3, and 8.3% of patients on placebo and empagliflozin 10 and 25 mg, respectively (females: 13.3, 18.0, and 17.5%, respectively; males: 2.7, 2.7, and 0%, respectively). Events consistent with genital infection were reported in 0.9, 2.7, and 2.3% of patients on placebo and empagliflozin 10 and 25 mg, respectively (females: 0.9, 4.5, and 3.9%, respectively; males: 0.9% in each group).ConclusionsEmpagliflozin 10 and 25 mg for 24 weeks as add-on to metformin plus sulfonylurea improved glycemic control, weight, and systolic blood pressure and were well tolerated.
| S-EPMC3816918 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectiveTo examine the efficacy and safety of adding the once-daily glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) lixisenatide to established basal insulin therapy alone or together with metformin, in people with type 2 diabetes and elevated glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c).Research design and methodsWe conducted a double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial. Patients (n = 495) with established basal insulin therapy but inadequate glycemic control were randomized to add lixisenatide 20 μg or placebo for 24 weeks. Basal insulin dosage was unchanged except to limit hypoglycemia. HbA1c reduction from baseline was the primary end point.ResultsMean duration of diabetes was 12.5 years, duration of insulin use was 3.1 years, insulin dosage was 55 units/day, and baseline HbA1c was 8.4%. With lixisenatide, the placebo-corrected change of HbA1c from baseline was -0.4% (95% CI -0.6 to -0.2; P = 0.0002), and mean HbA1c at end point was 7.8%. HbA1c <7.0% (53 mmol/mol) was attained by more lixisenatide (28%) than placebo (12%; P < 0.0001) participants. Lixisenatide reduced plasma glucose levels after a standardized breakfast (placebo-corrected reduction, -3.8 mmol/L; P < 0.0001); seven-point glucose profiles showed a reduction persisting through the day. Reductions in body weight (placebo corrected, -1.3 kg; P < 0.0001) and insulin dosage (-3.7 units/day; P = 0.012) were greater with lixisenatide. Main adverse events (AEs) with lixisenatide were gastrointestinal. Symptomatic hypoglycemia was 28% for lixisenatide and 22% for placebo; 4 of 328 subjects (1.2%) had severe hypoglycemia with lixisenatide vs. 0 of 167 with placebo.ConclusionsBy improving HbA1c and postprandial hyperglycemia without weight gain in type 2 diabetes with inadequate glycemic control despite stable basal insulin, lixisenatide may provide an alternative to rapid-acting insulin or other treatment options.
| S-EPMC3747925 | biostudies-literature
Project description:AimTo assess the efficacy and safety of empagliflozin as add-on to insulin in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D).Materials and methodsThis multicentre, double-blind, parallel-group study randomized Japanese patients with T2D insufficiently controlled with insulin (1:1:1) to empagliflozin 10 mg (n=89), empagliflozin 25 mg (n=90) or placebo (n=90) for 52 weeks. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) at 16 weeks.ResultsAt 16 weeks, empagliflozin 10 mg and 25 mg significantly decreased HbA1c: adjusted mean difference -0.92% (95% confidence interval [CI] -1.11, -0.73) and -1.00% (95% CI -1.18, -0.82; both P<0.0001) compared with placebo. This difference was maintained up to 52 weeks: adjusted mean difference at 52 weeks -0.90% (95% CI -1.09, -0.70) and -0.96% (95% CI -1.15, -0.77; both P<0.0001). At 52 weeks, significant improvements in fasting plasma glucose (adjusted mean difference -27.62 mg/dL [95% CI -36.15, -19.08] and -31.99 mg/dL [95% CI -40.35, -23.62]) and in body weight (-1.78 kg [95% CI -2.46, -1.10] and -1.92 kg [95% CI -2.58, -1.25]) were also seen with empagliflozin 10 mg and 25 mg compared with placebo (all P<0.0001). At 52 weeks, the frequency of adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs was similar in the three treatment groups; confirmed hypoglycaemia was reported slightly more in participants in the empagliflozin 10 mg and 25 mg groups (23.3% and 22.2% vs 14.4%). All hypoglycaemic events were mild in severity; no episodes required assistance.ConclusionsIn Japanese patients with insufficiently controlled T2D, adding empagliflozin 10 mg or 25 mg to insulin treatment was associated with clinically meaningful reductions in HbA1c at 16 weeks and was generally well tolerated.
| S-EPMC7065067 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThis study evaluated the effect of empagliflozin on postprandial glucose (PPG) and 24-hour glucose variability in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).MethodsPatients (N = 60; baseline mean [SD] HbA1c 7.91 [0.80]%; body mass index 24.3 [3.2] kg/m(2)) were randomized to receive empagliflozin 10 mg (n = 20), empagliflozin 25 mg (n = 19) or placebo (n = 21) once daily as monotherapy for 28 days. A meal tolerance test and continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) for 24 hours were performed at baseline and on days 1 and 28. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in area under the glucose concentration-time curve 3 hours after breakfast (AUC1-4h for PPG) at day 28.ResultsAdjusted mean (95%) differences versus placebo in changes from baseline in AUC1-4h for PPG at day 1 were -97.1 (-126.5, -67.8) mg · h/dl with empagliflozin 10 mg and -91.6 (-120.4, -62.8) mg · h/dl with empagliflozin 25 mg (both p < 0.001 versus placebo) and at day 28 were -85.5 (-126.0, -45.0) mg · h/dl with empagliflozin 10 mg and -104.9 (-144.8, -65.0) mg · h/dl with empagliflozin 25 mg (both p < 0.001 versus placebo). Adjusted mean (95% CI) differences versus placebo in change from baseline in 24-hour mean glucose (CGM) at day 1 were -20.8 (-27.0, -14.7) mg/dl with empagliflozin 10 mg and -23.9 (-30.0, -17.9) mg/dl with empagliflozin 25 mg (both p < 0.001 versus placebo) and at day 28 were -24.5 (-35.4, -13.6) mg/dl with empagliflozin 10 mg and -31.7 (-42.5,-20.9) mg/dl with empagliflozin 25 mg (both p < 0.001 versus placebo). Changes from baseline in mean amplitude of glucose excursions (MAGE; CGM) were not significantly different with either empagliflozin dose versus placebo at either timepoint. Curves of mean glucose (CGM) did not change between baseline and day 1 or 28 with placebo, but shifted downward with empagliflozin. Percentage of time with glucose ≥70 to <180 mg/dl increased from 52.0% at baseline to 77.0% at day 28 with empagliflozin 10 mg and from 55.0% to 81.1% with empagliflozin 25 mg, without increasing time spent with hypoglycemia.ConclusionEmpagliflozin for 28 days reduced PPG from the first day and improved daily blood glucose control in Japanese patients with T2DM.Trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov NCT01947855.
| S-EPMC4339254 | biostudies-literature
Project description:AimTo assess the effect of empagliflozin on cardiovascular (CV) risk in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) through a meta-analysis of data from eight placebo-controlled trials.MethodsData were analysed from eight randomized placebo-controlled trials undertaken to investigate the efficacy and safety of empagliflozin 10 and 25 mg once daily in patients with T2DM, comprising patients at low/medium and high CV risk. Suspected CV events were prospectively adjudicated. The empagliflozin 10 and 25 mg groups were pooled for the primary analysis. The primary endpoint was a composite of CV death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), non-fatal stroke and hospitalization for unstable angina [4-point major adverse CV events (MACE)]. The secondary endpoint was a composite of CV death, non-fatal MI and non-fatal stroke (3-point MACE). Risk estimates were calculated using Cox regression analysis.ResultsA total of 3835 patients received placebo and 7457 received empagliflozin. Total exposure was 7448.3 years for placebo and 15482.1 years for empagliflozin. Four-point MACE occurred in 365 (9.5%) patients receiving placebo and 635 (8.5%) patients receiving empagliflozin [hazard ratio for empagliflozin vs. placebo 0.86 (95% CI 0.76, 0.98)]. Three-point MACE occurred in 307 (8.0%) patients receiving placebo and 522 (7.0%) patients receiving empagliflozin [hazard ratio for empagliflozin vs. placebo 0.84 (95% CI 0.73, 0.96)].ConclusionsIn a meta-analysis of data from eight randomized trials involving 11 292 patients with T2DM at low/medium or high CV risk, empagliflozin was associated with a reduced risk of 4-point MACE and 3-point MACE compared with placebo.
| S-EPMC5096016 | biostudies-literature
Project description:AimTo evaluate the potential for glycaemic, renal and vascular benefits of bromocriptine quick release (BCQR) in adolescents and adults with type 1 diabetes.Materials and methodsForty adolescents and 40 adults with type 1 diabetes aged 12-60 years old were enrolled in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, random order crossover study of 4 weeks of treatment in the morning with BCQR (titrated weekly from 0.8 mg to 1.6 mg to 3.2 mg, minimum dose 1.6 mg). Study assessments after each phase included blood pressure (BP), lipids, peripheral arterial stiffness and autonomic function, mixed meal tolerance test, continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate, estimated insulin sensitivity, insulin dose and indirect calorimetry.ResultsAdolescents displayed baseline hyperglycaemia, insulin resistance, metabolic dysfunction and increased renal filtration compared with adults. In both age groups, continuous glucose monitoring measures, estimated insulin sensitivity and insulin dose did not differ with BCQR treatment. In adolescents, BCQR decreased systolic BP, diastolic BP and triangular index and increased serum creatinine. In adults, systolic BP, mean arterial pressure, systemic vascular resistance, and mixed meal tolerance test glucose and glucagon-like peptide 1 areas under the curve were lower, and the orthostatic drop in systolic BP was greater with BCQR.ConclusionsGreater hyperglycaemia, insulin resistance, metabolic dysfunction and renal hyperfiltration in adolescents argues for increased attention during this high-risk age period. Although BCQR had little impact on glycaemia or insulin sensitivity, initial vascular and renal responses suggest potential benefits of BCQR in adolescents and adults with type 1 diabetes requiring further study.
| S-EPMC10849845 | biostudies-literature
Project description:AIMS:Treatment with glucagon-like peptide (GLP)-1 receptor agonists or dipeptidyl peptidase (DPP)-4 inhibitors might increase gallstone formation; however, the mechanisms involved are unknown. We aimed to assess the effects of these drugs on gallbladder volume and bile acid profile. MATERIALS AND METHODS:A total of 57 type 2 diabetes patients (mean?±?SD age, 62.8?±?6.9?years; BMI, 31.8?±?4.1?kg/m2 ; HbA1c, 7.3%?±?0.6%), treated with metformin and/or sulfonylureas, were included in this 12-week randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, single-centre trial between July 2013 and August 2015 at the VU University Medical Center, the Netherlands. Patients received the GLP-1 receptor agonist liraglutide, the DPP-4 inhibitor sitagliptin or matching placebo for 12?weeks. Gallbladder fasting volume and ejection fraction were measured using ultrasonography after a high-fat meal. Serum bile acids were measured in the fasting and postprandial state and in faecal samples. The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01744236). RESULTS:Neither liraglutide nor sitagliptin had an effect on gallbladder fasting volume and ejection fraction (p?>?.05). Liraglutide increased serum levels of deoxycholic acid in the fasting state [0.20?µmol/L (95% CI 0.027-0.376), p?=?0.024] and postprandial state [AUC 40.71 (13.22-68.21), p?=?0.005] and in faeces [ratio 1.5 (1.03-2.19); p?=?0.035]. Sitagliptin had no effect on serum bile acids, but increased faecal levels of chenodeoxycholic acid [ratio 3.42 (1.33-8.79), p?=?0.012], cholic acid [ratio 3.32 (1.26-8.87), p?=?0.017] and ursodeoxycholic acid [ratio 3.81 (1.44-10.14), p?=?0.008]. CONCLUSIONS:Neither liraglutide nor sitagliptin has an effect on gallbladder volume. Observed changes in bile acids with liraglutide suggest alterations in the intestinal microbiome, while sitagliptin appears to increase hepatic bile acid production.
| S-EPMC5129471 | biostudies-literature