Dataset Information

Electrical source imaging of interictal spikes using multiple sparse volumetric priors for presurgical epileptogenic focus localization.

ABSTRACT: Electrical source imaging of interictal spikes observed in EEG recordings of patients with refractory epilepsy provides useful information to localize the epileptogenic focus during the presurgical evaluation. However, the selection of the time points or time epochs of the spikes in order to estimate the origin of the activity remains a challenge. In this study, we consider a Bayesian EEG source imaging technique for distributed sources, i.e. the multiple volumetric sparse priors (MSVP) approach. The approach allows to estimate the time courses of the intensity of the sources corresponding with a specific time epoch of the spike. Based on presurgical averaged interictal spikes in six patients who were successfully treated with surgery, we estimated the time courses of the source intensities for three different time epochs: (i) an epoch starting 50 ms before the spike peak and ending at 50% of the spike peak during the rising phase of the spike, (ii) an epoch starting 50 ms before the spike peak and ending at the spike peak and (iii) an epoch containing the full spike time period starting 50 ms before the spike peak and ending 230 ms after the spike peak. To identify the primary source of the spike activity, the source with the maximum energy from 50 ms before the spike peak till 50% of the spike peak was subsequently selected for each of the time windows. For comparison, the activity at the spike peaks and at 50% of the peaks was localized using the LORETA inversion technique and an ECD approach. Both patient-specific spherical forward models and patient-specific 5-layered finite difference models were considered to evaluate the influence of the forward model. Based on the resected zones in each of the patients, extracted from post-operative MR images, we compared the distances to the resection border of the estimated activity. Using the spherical models, the distances to the resection border for the MSVP approach and each of the different time epochs were in the same range as the LORETA and ECD techniques. We found distances smaller than 23 mm, with robust results for all the patients. For the finite difference models, we found that the distances to the resection border for the MSVP inversions of the full spike time epochs were generally smaller compared to the MSVP inversions of the time epochs before the spike peak. The results also suggest that the inversions using the finite difference models resulted in slightly smaller distances to the resection border compared to the spherical models. The results we obtained are promising because the MSVP approach allows to study the network of the estimated source-intensities and allows to characterize the spatial extent of the underlying sources.

SUBMITTER: Strobbe G

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4773507 | biostudies-literature | 2016

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Electrical source imaging of interictal spikes using multiple sparse volumetric priors for presurgical epileptogenic focus localization.

Strobbe Gregor G Carrette Evelien E López José David JD Montes Restrepo Victoria V Van Roost Dirk D Meurs Alfred A Vonck Kristl K Boon Paul P Vandenberghe Stefaan S van Mierlo Pieter P

NeuroImage. Clinical 20160120

Electrical source imaging of interictal spikes observed in EEG recordings of patients with refractory epilepsy provides useful information to localize the epileptogenic focus during the presurgical evaluation. However, the selection of the time points or time epochs of the spikes in order to estimate the origin of the activity remains a challenge. In this study, we consider a Bayesian EEG source imaging technique for distributed sources, i.e. the multiple volumetric sparse priors (MSVP) approach ...[more]

PMID: 26958464

Similar Datasets

Project description:Electromagnetic source imaging (ESI) offers unique capability of imaging brain dynamics for studying brain functions and aiding the clinical management of brain disorders. Challenges exist in ESI due to the ill-posedness of the inverse problem and thus the need of modeling the underlying brain dynamics for regularizations. Advances in generative models provide opportunities for more accurate and realistic source modeling that could offer an alternative approach to ESI for modeling the underlying brain dynamics beyond equivalent physical source models. However, it is not straightforward to explicitly formulate the knowledge arising from these generative models within the conventional ESI framework. Here we investigate a novel source imaging framework based on mesoscale neuronal modeling and deep learning (DL) that can learn the sensor-source mapping relationship directly from MEG data for ESI. Two DL-based ESI models were trained based on data generated by neural mass models and either generic or personalized head models. The robustness of the two DL models was evaluated by systematic computer simulations and clinical validation in a cohort of 29 drug-resistant focal epilepsy patients who underwent intracranial EEG (iEEG) evaluation or surgical resection. Results estimated from pre-operative MEG interictal spikes were quantified using the overlap with resection regions and the distance to the seizure-onset zone (SOZ) defined by iEEG recordings. The DL-based ESI provided robust results when no personalized head geometry is considered, reaching a spatial dispersion of 21.90 ± 19.03 mm, sublobar concordance of 83 %, and sublobar sensitivity and specificity of 66 and 97 % respectively. When using personalized head geometry derived from individual patients' MRI in the training data, personalized DL-based ESI model can further improve the performance and reached a spatial dispersion of 8.19 ± 8.14 mm, sublobar concordance of 93 %, and sublobar sensitivity and specificity of 77 and 99 % respectively. When compared to the SOZ, the localization error of the personalized approach is 15.78 ± 5.54 mm, outperforming the conventional benchmarks. This work demonstrates that combining generative models and deep learning enables an accurate and robust imaging of epileptogenic zone from MEG recordings with strong sublobar precision, suggesting its added value to enhancing MEG source localization and imaging, and to epilepsy source localization and other clinical applications.

Project description:While seizure activity may be electrographically widespread, increasing evidence has suggested that ictal discharges may in fact represent travelling waves propagated from a focal seizure source. Interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) are an electrographic manifestation of excessive hypersynchronization of cortical activity that occur between seizures and are considered a marker of potentially epileptogenic tissue. The precise relationship between brain regions demonstrating IEDs and those involved in seizure onset, however, remains poorly understood. Here, we hypothesize that IEDs likewise reflect the receipt of travelling waves propagated from the same regions which give rise to seizures. Forty patients from our institution who underwent invasive monitoring for epilepsy, proceeded to surgery and had at least one year of follow-up were included in our study. Interictal epileptiform discharges were detected using custom software, validated by a clinical epileptologist. We show that IEDs reach electrodes in sequences with a consistent temporal ordering, and this ordering matches the timing of receipt of ictal discharges, suggesting that both types of discharges spread as travelling waves. We use a novel approach for localization of ictal discharges, in which time differences of discharge receipt at nearby electrodes are used to compute source location; similar algorithms have been used in acoustics and geophysics. We find that interictal discharges co-localize with ictal discharges. Moreover, interictal discharges tend to localize to the resection territory in patients with good surgical outcome and outside of the resection territory in patients with poor outcome. The seizure source may originate at, and also travel to, spatially distinct IED foci. Our data provide evidence that interictal discharges may represent travelling waves of pathological activity that are similar to their ictal counterparts, and that both ictal and interictal discharges emerge from common epileptogenic brain regions. Our findings have important clinical implications, as they suggest that seizure source localizations may be derived from interictal discharges, which are much more frequent than seizures.

Project description:Objective:Electrical source imaging (ESI) is used increasingly to estimate the epileptogenic zone (EZ) in patients with epilepsy. Directed functional connectivity (DFC) coupled to ESI helps to better characterize epileptic networks, but studies on interictal activity have relied on high-density recordings. We investigated the accuracy of ESI and DFC for localizing the EZ, based on low-density clinical electroencephalography (EEG). Methods:We selected patients with the following: (a) focal epilepsy, (b) interictal spikes on standard EEG, (c) either a focal structural lesion concordant with the electroclinical semiology or good postoperative outcome. In 34 patients (20 temporal lobe epilepsy [TLE], 14 extra-TLE [ETLE]), we marked interictal spikes and estimated the cortical activity during each spike in 82 cortical regions using a patient-specific head model and distributed linear inverse solution. DFC between brain regions was computed using Granger-causal modeling followed by network topologic measures. The concordance with the presumed EZ at the sublobar level was computed using the epileptogenic lesion or the resected area in postoperative seizure-free patients. Results:ESI, summed outflow, and efficiency were concordant with the presumed EZ in 76% of the patients, whereas the clustering coefficient and betweenness centrality were concordant in 70% of patients. There was no significant difference between ESI and connectivity measures. In all measures, patients with TLE had a significantly higher (P < 0.05) concordance with the presumed EZ than patients with with ETLE. The brain volume accepted for concordance was significantly larger in TLE. Significance:ESI and DFC derived from low-density EEG can reliably estimate the EZ from interictal spikes. Connectivity measures were not superior to ESI for EZ localization during interictal spikes, but the current validation of the localization of connectivity measure is promising for other applications.

Project description:ObjectivePresurgical high-density electric source imaging (hdESI) of interictal epileptic discharges (IEDs) is only used by few epilepsy centers. One obstacle is the time-consuming workflow both for recording as well as for visual review. Therefore, we analyzed the effect of (a) an automated IED detection and (b) the number of IEDs on the accuracy of hdESI and time-effectiveness.MethodsIn 22 patients with pharmacoresistant focal epilepsy receiving epilepsy surgery (Engel 1) we retrospectively detected IEDs both visually and semi-automatically using the EEG analysis software Persyst in 256-channel EEGs. The amount of IEDs, the Euclidean distance between hdESI maximum and resection zone, and the operator time were compared. Additionally, we evaluated the intra-individual effect of IED quantity on the distance between hdESI maximum of all IEDs and hdESI maximum when only a reduced amount of IEDs were included.ResultsThere was no significant difference in the number of IEDs between visually versus semi-automatically marked IEDs (74 ± 56 IEDs/patient vs 116 ± 115 IEDs/patient). The detection method of the IEDs had no significant effect on the mean distances between resection zone and hdESI maximum (visual: 26.07 ± 31.12 mm vs semi-automated: 33.6 ± 34.75 mm). However, the mean time needed to review the full datasets semi-automatically was shorter by 275 ± 46 min (305 ± 72 min vs 30 ± 26 min, P < 0.001). The distance between hdESI of the full versus reduced amount of IEDs of the same patient was smaller than 1 cm when at least a mean of 33 IEDs were analyzed. There was a significantly shorter intraindividual distance between resection zone and hdESI maximum when 30 IEDs were analyzed as compared to the analysis of only 10 IEDs (P < 0.001).SignificanceSemi-automatized processing and limiting the amount of IEDs analyzed (~30-40 IEDs per cluster) appear to be time-saving clinical tools to increase the practicability of hdESI in the presurgical work-up.

Dataset Information

Electrical source imaging of interictal spikes using multiple sparse volumetric priors for presurgical epileptogenic focus localization.

Publications

Electrical source imaging of interictal spikes using multiple sparse volumetric priors for presurgical epileptogenic focus localization.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets