Dataset Information

Genomic Selection in Multi-environment Crop Trials.

ABSTRACT: Genomic selection in crop breeding introduces modeling challenges not found in animal studies. These include the need to accommodate replicate plants for each line, consider spatial variation in field trials, address line by environment interactions, and capture nonadditive effects. Here, we propose a flexible single-stage genomic selection approach that resolves these issues. Our linear mixed model incorporates spatial variation through environment-specific terms, and also randomization-based design terms. It considers marker, and marker by environment interactions using ridge regression best linear unbiased prediction to extend genomic selection to multiple environments. Since the approach uses the raw data from line replicates, the line genetic variation is partitioned into marker and nonmarker residual genetic variation (i.e., additive and nonadditive effects). This results in a more precise estimate of marker genetic effects. Using barley height data from trials, in 2 different years, of up to 477 cultivars, we demonstrate that our new genomic selection model improves predictions compared to current models. Analyzing single trials revealed improvements in predictive ability of up to 5.7%. For the multiple environment trial (MET) model, combining both year trials improved predictive ability up to 11.4% compared to a single environment analysis. Benefits were significant even when fewer markers were used. Compared to a single-year standard model run with 3490 markers, our partitioned MET model achieved the same predictive ability using between 500 and 1000 markers depending on the trial. Our approach can be used to increase accuracy and confidence in the selection of the best lines for breeding and/or, to reduce costs by using fewer markers.

SUBMITTER: Oakey H

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4856083 | biostudies-literature | 2016 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Genomic Selection in Multi-environment Crop Trials.

Oakey Helena H Cullis Brian B Thompson Robin R Comadran Jordi J Halpin Claire C Waugh Robbie R

G3 (Bethesda, Md.) 20160503 5

Genomic selection in crop breeding introduces modeling challenges not found in animal studies. These include the need to accommodate replicate plants for each line, consider spatial variation in field trials, address line by environment interactions, and capture nonadditive effects. Here, we propose a flexible single-stage genomic selection approach that resolves these issues. Our linear mixed model incorporates spatial variation through environment-specific terms, and also randomization-based d ...[more]

PMID: 26976443

Similar Datasets

Project description:Genomic selection (GS) models use genome-wide genetic information to predict genetic values of candidates of selection. Originally, these models were developed without considering genotype × environment interaction(G×E). Several authors have proposed extensions of the single-environment GS model that accommodate G×E using either covariance functions or environmental covariates. In this study, we model G×E using a marker × environment interaction (M×E) GS model; the approach is conceptually simple and can be implemented with existing GS software. We discuss how the model can be implemented by using an explicit regression of phenotypes on markers or using co-variance structures (a genomic best linear unbiased prediction-type model). We used the M×E model to analyze three CIMMYT wheat data sets (W1, W2, and W3), where more than 1000 lines were genotyped using genotyping-by-sequencing and evaluated at CIMMYT's research station in Ciudad Obregon, Mexico, under simulated environmental conditions that covered different irrigation levels, sowing dates and planting systems. We compared the M×E model with a stratified (i.e., within-environment) analysis and with a standard (across-environment) GS model that assumes that effects are constant across environments (i.e., ignoring G×E). The prediction accuracy of the M×E model was substantially greater of that of an across-environment analysis that ignores G×E. Depending on the prediction problem, the M×E model had either similar or greater levels of prediction accuracy than the stratified analyses. The M×E model decomposes marker effects and genomic values into components that are stable across environments (main effects) and others that are environment-specific (interactions). Therefore, in principle, the interaction model could shed light over which variants have effects that are stable across environments and which ones are responsible for G×E. The data set and the scripts required to reproduce the analysis are publicly available as Supporting Information.

Project description:Developing high yielding rice varieties that are tolerant to drought stress is crucial for the sustainable livelihood of rice farmers in rainfed rice cropping ecosystems. Genomic selection (GS) promises to be an effective breeding option for these complex traits. We evaluated the effectiveness of two rather new options in the implementation of GS: trait and environment-specific marker selection and the use of multi-environment prediction models. A reference population of 280 rainfed lowland accessions endowed with 215k SNP markers data was phenotyped under a favorable and two managed drought environments. Trait-specific SNP subsets (28k) were selected for each trait under each environment, using results of GWAS performed with the complete genotype dataset. Performances of single-environment and multi-environment genomic prediction models were compared using kernel regression based methods (GBLUP and RKHS) under two cross validation scenarios: availability (CV2) or not (CV1) of phenotypic data for the validation set, in one of the environments. Trait-specific marker selection strategy achieved predictive ability (PA) of genomic prediction up to 22% higher than markers selected on the bases of neutral linkage disequilibrium (LD). Tolerance to drought stress was up to 32% better predicted by multi-environment models (especially RKHS based models) under CV2 strategy. Under the less favorable CV1 strategy, the multi-environment models achieved similar PA than the single-environment predictions. We also showed that reasonable PA could be obtained with as few as 3,000 SNP markers, even in a population of low LD extent, provided marker selection is based on pairwise LD. The implications of these findings for breeding for drought tolerance are discussed. The most resource sparing option would be accurate phenotyping of the reference population in a favorable environment and under a managed drought, while the candidate population would be phenotyped only under one of those environments.

Project description:Genotype-by-environment interaction (GEI) is among the greatest challenges for maize breeding programs. Strong GEI limits both the prediction of genotype performance across variable environmental conditions and the identification of genomic regions associated with grain yield. Incorporating GEI into yield prediction models has been shown to improve prediction accuracy of yield; nevertheless, more work is needed to further understand this complex interaction across populations and environments. The main objectives of this study were to: 1) assess GEI in maize grain yield based on reaction norm models and predict hybrid performance across a gradient of environmental (EG) conditions and 2) perform a genome-wide association study (GWAS) and post-GWAS analyses for maize grain yield using data from 2014 to 2017 of the Genomes to Fields initiative hybrid trial. After quality control, 2,126 hybrids with genotypic and phenotypic data were assessed across 86 environments representing combinations of locations and years, although not all hybrids were evaluated in all environments. Heritability was greater in higher-yielding environments due to an increase in genetic variability in these environments in comparison to the low-yielding environments. GWAS was carried out for yield and five single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with the highest magnitude of effect were selected in each environment for follow-up analyses. Many candidate genes in proximity of selected SNPs have been previously reported with roles in stress response. Genomic prediction was performed to assess prediction accuracy of previously tested or untested hybrids in environments from a new growing season. Prediction accuracy was 0.34 for cross validation across years (CV0-Predicted EG) and 0.21 for cross validation across years with only untested hybrids (CV00-Predicted EG) when compared to Best Linear Unbiased Prediction (BLUPs) that did not utilize genotypic or environmental relationships. Prediction accuracy improved to 0.80 (CV0-Predicted EG) and 0.60 (CV00-Predicted EG) when compared to the whole-dataset model that used the genomic relationships and the environmental gradient of all environments in the study. These results identify regions of the genome for future selection to improve yield and a methodology to increase the number of hybrids evaluated across locations of a multi-environment trial through genomic prediction.

Dataset Information

Genomic Selection in Multi-environment Crop Trials.

Publications

Genomic Selection in Multi-environment Crop Trials.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets