Dataset Information

Patient-reported adverse effects of high-dose intravenous methylprednisolone treatment: a prospective web-based multi-center study in multiple sclerosis patients with a relapse.

ABSTRACT: In a prospective multi-center observational study, we evaluated the frequency, severity, and impact on activities of daily living (ADL) of adverse effects (AEs) of high-dose intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP) in relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (MS) patients with a relapse. Online self-report questionnaires stating IVMP's most common AEs were completed at baseline, the 2nd day of treatment, and 1 day and 1 week after treatment. Eighty-five patients were included, 66 completed the baseline questionnaire, and 59 completed at least one post-baseline questionnaire. Patients reported on average 4 (median) AEs; two (3.4 %) reported no AE. Most frequent was change in taste (61 %), facial flushing (61 %), sick/stomach pain (53 %), sleep disturbance (44 %), appetite change (37 %), agitation (36 %), and behavioral changes (36 %). Of all AEs, 34.3 % were severe and 37.9 % impacted on ADL. A 3-day course resulted in 4 (median) AEs and a 5-day course in 7. All patients with high disease impact had two or more AEs, compared with 79 % of those with low impact (p < 0.01). Of patients with high disability, 45 % had severe AEs, compared with 16 % of those with low disability. Severe central nervous system (CNS)-related AEs occurred two times more frequently in patients with high disease impact, and two-and-a-half times more frequently in patients with high disability. Therefore, in virtually all patients, high-dose IVMP leads to AEs, with about one of three AEs being severe with impact on ADL. Patients with high disease impact or high disability may experience more (severe) AEs, due to a higher occurrence of severe CNS-related AEs.

SUBMITTER: Jongen PJ

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4971042 | biostudies-literature | 2016 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Patient-reported adverse effects of high-dose intravenous methylprednisolone treatment: a prospective web-based multi-center study in multiple sclerosis patients with a relapse.

Jongen Peter Joseph PJ Stavrakaki Ioanna I Voet Bernard B Hoogervorst Erwin E van Munster Erik E Linssen Wim H WH Sinnige Ludovicus G LG Verhagen Wim I WI Visser Leo H LH van der Kruijk Ruud R Verheul Freek F Boringa Jan J Heerings Marco M Gladdines Werner W Lönnqvist Fredrik F Gaillard Pieter P

Journal of neurology 20160607 8

In a prospective multi-center observational study, we evaluated the frequency, severity, and impact on activities of daily living (ADL) of adverse effects (AEs) of high-dose intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP) in relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (MS) patients with a relapse. Online self-report questionnaires stating IVMP's most common AEs were completed at baseline, the 2nd day of treatment, and 1 day and 1 week after treatment. Eighty-five patients were included, 66 completed the baseli ...[more]

PMID: 27272956

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectiveIntravenous methylprednisolone is the standard treatment for a multiple sclerosis relapse; however, this fails to improve symptoms in up to one quarter of patients. Immunoadsorption is an accepted treatment for refractory relapses, but prospective comparator-controlled studies are missing.MethodsIn this observational study, patients with steroid-refractory acute multiple sclerosis relapses receiving either six courses of tryptophan-immunoadsorption or double-dose methylprednisolone therapy were analysed. Outcomes were evaluated at discharge and three months later. Immune profiling of blood lymphocytes and proteomic analysis were performed by multi-parameter flow cytometry and Olink analysis, respectively (NCT04450030).Results42 patients were enrolled (methylprednisolone: 26 patients; immunoadsorption: 16 patients). For determination of the primary outcome, treatment response was stratified according to relative function system score changes ("full/best" vs. "average" vs. "worse/none"). Upon discharge, the adjusted odds ratio for any treatment response ("full/best" + "average" vs. "worse/none") was 10.697 favouring immunoadsorption (p = 0.005 compared to methylprednisolone). At follow-up, the adjusted odds ratio for the best treatment response ("full/best" vs. "average" + "worse/none") was 103.236 favouring IA patients (p = 0.001 compared to methylprednisolone). Similar results were observed regarding evoked potentials and quality of life outcomes, as well as serum neurofilament light-chain levels. Flow cytometry revealed a profound reduction of B cell subsets following immunoadsorption, which was closely correlated to clinical outcomes, whereas methylprednisolone had a minimal effect on B cell populations. Immunoadsorption treatment skewed the blood cytokine network, reduced levels of B cell-related cytokines and reduced immunoglobulin levels as well as levels of certain coagulation factors.InterpretationImmunoadsorption demonstrated favourable outcomes compared to double-dose methylprednisolone. Outcome differences were significant at discharge and follow-up. Further analyses identified modulation of B cell function as a potential mechanism of action for immunoadsorption, as reduction of B cell subsets correlated with clinical improvement.

Project description:Background Dysthyroid optic neuropathy (DON) is a serious threatening vision loss in Graves’ ophthalmopathy (GO). Although the European Group on Graves’ Ophthalmopathy (EUGOGO) recommend intravenous methylprednisolone therapy for first line treatment, some characteristics predicting the response are still inconclusive. Aim To study the efficacy of intravenous pulse methylprednisolone (IVMP) in treating dysthyroid optic neuropathy (DON) and to identify factors predicting poor response to the treatment. Methods All patients diagnosed with DON between January 2010 and December 2021 at Rajavithi Hospital, Thailand, receiving IVMP 1 g/ day for 3 consecutive days were analyzed. The efficacy at 1 week and 3, 6, 12-months in terms of improvement of best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and proptosis were compiled. Results Of the entire 57 DON cases that received IVMP, 50.9% gained at least 0.2 Logarithm of the Minimum Angle of Resolution (logMAR) at 1 week, and the improvement from initial to 1-week BCVA was 0.63 ± 0.63 logMAR (p < 0.001) and the decrease in proptosis was 1.8 ± 1.36 mm (p < 0.001). The remaining 23 orbits underwent orbital decompression and were excluded from the long-term efficacy analysis. In the last 12-months’ follow-up time, there was an improvement of BCVA (0.53 ± 0.47 logMAR) and proptosis (0.59 ± 0.66 mm) (both p < 0.001). At last visit, there was an improvement of BCVA (0.2 logMAR) and proptosis (2 mm) in 76.5, and 5.9% respectively. Significant predictive factors of poor treatment response were age ≥ 55 years (odds ratio [OR]: 8.28, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.368–50.121, p = 0.021); longer onset duration before treatment (OR: 5.10, 95%CI: 1.061–24.501, p = 0.042); and proptosis at baseline (OR: 9.31, 95%CI: 1.872–46.280, p = 0.006). The strongest risk factor for predicting poor response to IVMP was poor initial visual acuity (OR: 10.26, 95%CI: 1.363–77.234, p = 0.024). Conclusions IVMP is effective for both short- and long-term treatment to improve visual acuity greater than proptosis. Older age, longer disease duration, poor initial visual acuity, and proptotic orbits were identified as risk factors for predicting poor response to IVMP treatment in Thai population. DON patients having those risk factors should be suspected, and treated early with IVMP to preserve their future vision. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12886-023-02789-5.

Project description:BackgroundSerious cardiovascular adverse events (SCAEs) associated with intravenous sedatives remain poorly characterized.ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to compare SCAE incidence, types, and mortality between intravenous benzodiazepines (i.e., diazepam, lorazepam, and midazolam), dexmedetomidine, and propofol in the USA over 8 years regardless of the clinical setting where it was administered.MethodsThe Food and Drug Administration's MedWatch Adverse Event Reporting System was searched between 2004 and 2011 using the Evidex® platform from Advera Health Analytics, Inc. to identify all reports that included one or more of ten different SCAEs (package insert incidence???1%) and where an intravenous benzodiazepine, dexmedetomidine, or propofol was the primary suspected drug.ResultsAmong the 2326 Food and Drug Administration's MedWatch Adverse Event Reporting System cases reported, 394 (16.9%) were related to a SCAE. The presence of a SCAE (vs. a non-SCAE) is associated with higher mortality (34 vs. 8%, p?<?0.001). The percentage of cases with one or more SCAE, the case mortality rate (%), and the incidence of each SCAE (per 106 days of sedative exposure), respectively, were benzodiazepines (14, 26, 13) [diazepam (13, 23, 31); lorazepam (15, 43, 14); midazolam (14, 20, 11)]; dexmedetomidine (40, 15, 13); and propofol (17, 39, 7). Propofol (vs. either a benzodiazepine or dexmedetomidine) was associated with more total SCAEs (268 vs. 126, p?<?0.001) but a lower incidence (per 106 days of sedative exposure) of SCAE (7 vs. 13, p?=?0.0001) and cardiac arrest [6.3 (benzodiazepine) vs. 6.7 (dexmedetomidine) vs. 1.4 (propofol), p?<?0.0001].ConclusionsSerious cardiac adverse events account for nearly one-fifth of intravenous sedative Food and Drug Administration's MedWatch Adverse Event Reporting System reports. These SCAEs appear to be associated with greater mortality than non-cardiac serious adverse events. Serious cardiac events may be more prevalent with either benzodiazepines or dexmedetomidine than propofol.

Dataset Information

Patient-reported adverse effects of high-dose intravenous methylprednisolone treatment: a prospective web-based multi-center study in multiple sclerosis patients with a relapse.

Publications

Patient-reported adverse effects of high-dose intravenous methylprednisolone treatment: a prospective web-based multi-center study in multiple sclerosis patients with a relapse.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets