Dataset Information

Phase II Study of Nilotinib in Melanoma Harboring KIT Alterations Following Progression to Prior KIT Inhibition.

ABSTRACT: Although durable responses can be achieved with tyrosine kinase inhibitors such as imatinib in melanomas harboring KIT mutations, the efficacy of alternative inhibitors after progression to imatinib and the activity of these agents on brain metastases are unknown.We conducted a phase II study of nilotinib 400 mg twice a day in two cohorts of patients with melanomas harboring KIT mutations or amplification: (A) those refractory or intolerant to a prior KIT inhibitor; and (B) those with brain metastases. The primary endpoint was 4-month disease control rate. Secondary endpoints included response rate, time-to-progression (TTP), and overall survival (OS). A Simon two-stage and a single-stage design was planned to assess for the primary endpoint in cohorts A and B, respectively.Twenty patients were enrolled and 19 treated (11 in cohort A; 8 in cohort B). Three patients on cohort A [27%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 8%-56%] and 1 on cohort B (12.5%; 90% CI, 0.6%-47%) achieved the primary endpoint. Two partial responses were observed in cohort A (18.2%; 90% CI, 3%-47%); none were observed in cohort B. The median TTP and OS was 3.3 (90% CI, 2.1-3.9 months) and 9.1 months (90% CI, 4.3-14.2 months), respectively, in all treated patients.Nilotinib may achieve disease control in patients with melanoma harboring KIT alterations and whose disease progressed after imatinib therapy. The efficacy of this agent in KIT-altered melanoma with brain metastasis is limited.

SUBMITTER: Carvajal RD

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5013827 | biostudies-literature | 2015 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Phase II Study of Nilotinib in Melanoma Harboring KIT Alterations Following Progression to Prior KIT Inhibition.

Carvajal Richard D RD Lawrence Donald P DP Weber Jeffrey S JS Gajewski Thomas F TF Gonzalez Rene R Lutzky Jose J O'Day Steven J SJ Hamid Omid O Wolchok Jedd D JD Chapman Paul B PB Sullivan Ryan J RJ Teitcher Jerrold B JB Ramaiya Nikhil N Giobbie-Hurder Anita A Antonescu Cristina R CR Heinrich Michael C MC Bastian Boris C BC Corless Christopher L CL Fletcher Jonathan A JA Hodi F Stephen FS

Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research 20150218 10

<h4>Purpose</h4>Although durable responses can be achieved with tyrosine kinase inhibitors such as imatinib in melanomas harboring KIT mutations, the efficacy of alternative inhibitors after progression to imatinib and the activity of these agents on brain metastases are unknown.<h4>Experimental design</h4>We conducted a phase II study of nilotinib 400 mg twice a day in two cohorts of patients with melanomas harboring KIT mutations or amplification: (A) those refractory or intolerant to a prior ...[more]

PMID: 25695690

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundKIT has been suggested to be a potential therapeutic target for malignant melanoma. We evaluated the antitumor activity and safety of the KIT inhibitor nilotinib in metastatic melanoma patients harboring KIT gene mutations or amplifications.MethodsWe conducted a phase II multicenter trial of nilotinib in metastatic malignant melanoma with KIT mutations or amplifications. Patients received 400 mg oral nilotinib twice daily. The primary endpoint was response rate, and if seven or more responders were observed from the cumulative 36 patients, nilotinib would be considered worthy of further testing in this study population.ResultsBetween October 2009 and June 2013, 176 patients underwent molecular screening for KIT gene aberrations, and 42 patients harboring KIT gene mutations and/or amplification were enrolled in the study. Overall, 25 (59.5%), 15 (35.7%), and 2 (4.8%) patients had KIT mutations, KIT amplifications, and both KIT mutations and amplification, respectively. Of the 42 enrolled patients, 1 patient achieved complete response, 6 patients achieved partial response, and 17 patients achieved stable disease, resulting in an overall response rate of 16.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.4%-28.0%) and a disease control rate of 57.1% (95% CI: 42.1%-72.1%). The median duration of response was 34 weeks (range: 5-55 weeks). Of the 7 responders, 6 patients had KIT mutations (exon 11: 5 patients; exon 17: 1 patient), and 1 patient had KIT amplification only.ConclusionAlthough this study did not meet its primary endpoint of response rate, nilotinib showed durable response in a subset of metastatic melanoma patients with specific KIT mutations.Implications for practiceKIT aberration can be detected in a subset of metastatic melanoma patients. This phase II trial showed that nilotinib demonstrates durable response in a subset of patients with KIT mutations. The safety profile was very tolerable. This study suggests that a KIT inhibitor may benefit a small subset of metastatic melanoma patients with KIT mutations.

Project description:IntroductionGenetic alterations of KIT gene are known to be one of the major causes of melanoma. Those are more common in the mucous and acral subtypes and KIT is regarded as major oncogene in Asian melanomas, where the prevalence of these subtypes is high. Up to date, several clinical trials have been conducted to target KIT gene alterations in melanoma with unsatisfied efficacies. Imatinib mesylate, a small-molecule inhibitor of the KIT tyrosine kinase, provides a rapid but not durable clinical response in KIT-mutant melanoma. Meanwhile, recent basic and clinical evidence have revealed another aspect of KIT-targeted therapy, namely the enhancement of antitumor activity of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Herein, we designed clinical trial of co-administrating imatinib mesylate and pembrolizumab (anti-PD-1 antibody) to evaluate its safety and efficacy.Methods and analysisThis is an open-label, single-arm, phase I/II clinical trial involving Japanese patients with metastatic KIT-mutant melanoma that are refractory to standard therapy including anti-PD-1 therapy. Phase I study is a dose-escalation study comprising two dose levels of imatinib mesylate (200 and 400 mg/day, respectively) with fixed dose of pembrolizumab (200 mg every 3 weeks) to evaluate safety and tolerability and determine recommended phase II dose. The primary endpoint of the phase II study is the objective response rate after 4 cycles (3 weeks/cycle) of pembrolizumab and imatinib mesylate at the dose determined in phase I, based on RECIST version 1.1. A Simon's minimax two-stage design is employed to test the null hypothesis of a 5% response rate vs 30% alternative, which will be rejected when a lower confidence limit of two-sided 90% confidence interval of true response rate is over than threshold response rate. The secondary endpoints include progression free survival, overall survival, best overall response and incidence of adverse events. Totally, a target size of 22 patients will be expected.DiscussionIf this study shows efficacy and acceptable safety profile, it will contribute to the development of novel treatment option for patients with KIT-mutant melanoma that are refractory to standard therapy.Trial registrationNCT04546074. Date of Registration: September 11, 2020 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04546074). Date of First Participant Enrollment: December 23, 2020.

Project description:Although melanoma is the least frequent type of skin cancer, it accounts for the majority of skin cancer-related deaths. Large-scale sequencing efforts have led to the classification of melanoma into four major subtypes (i.e., BRAF-mutant, NRAS-mutant, NF1-deficient, and triple wild-type). These sequencing studies have also revealed that melanoma genomes are some of the most mutated genomes of all cancers and therefore have a high neoantigen load. These findings have resulted in the development and clinical use of targeted therapies against the oncogenic BRAF→MEK→ERK pathway and immune checkpoint inhibitors for the treatment of metastatic melanoma. Although some patients with metastatic melanoma benefit immensely from these transformative therapies, others either become resistant or do not respond at all. These clinical challenges have intensified the search for new drug targets and drugs that can benefit patients who are either intrinsically resistant or have acquired resistance to targeted therapies and immunotherapies. Numerous signaling pathways and oncogenic drivers can cause changes in mRNA transcription that in turn drive melanoma initiation and progression. Transcriptional regulation of mRNA expression is necessary to maintain cell identity and cellular plasticity via the regulation of transcription factor expression and function, promoter/enhancer activities, chromatin regulators, and three-dimensional genome organization. Transcriptional deregulation can arise due to genetic and/or non-genetic alterations in the genome. Specifically, these deregulated transcriptional programs can become liabilities for melanoma cells due to their acquired dependencies on these programs for survival, which can be harnessed to develop new therapies for melanoma. In this article, we present an overview of the mechanisms that result in the transcriptional deregulation of mRNA expression in melanoma cells and assess how these changes facilitate melanoma initiation and progression. We also describe how these deregulated transcriptional pathways represent new opportunities for the development of unconventional and potentially impactful treatments for metastatic melanoma.

Dataset Information

Phase II Study of Nilotinib in Melanoma Harboring KIT Alterations Following Progression to Prior KIT Inhibition.

Publications

Phase II Study of Nilotinib in Melanoma Harboring KIT Alterations Following Progression to Prior KIT Inhibition.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets