Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Impact on Patient Management of [18F]-Fluorodeoxyglucose-Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Used for Cancer Diagnosis: Analysis of Data From the National Oncologic PET Registry.


ABSTRACT:

Introduction

We assessed the impact of [(18)F]-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET) on intended management of patients in the National Oncologic PET Registry (NOPR) for three different diagnostic indications: (a) determining whether a suspicious lesion is cancer (Dx), (b) detecting an unknown primary tumor site when there is confirmed or strongly suspected metastatic disease (cancer of unknown primary origin [CUP]), and (c) detecting a primary tumor site when there is a presumed paraneoplastic syndrome (PNS).

Methods

We reviewed a sample of randomly selected reports of NOPR subjects who underwent PET for Dx and CUP and all reports for PNS to find subjects for analysis. For these studies, we evaluated the impact of PET on referring physicians' intended management, based on their management plans reported before and after PET.

Results

Intended management was changed more frequently in the CUP group (43.1%) than in the Dx (23.9%) and PNS (25.4%) groups (CUP vs. Dx, p < .0001; PNS vs. Dx, p < .0001; CUP vs. PNS, p < .0002). Referring physicians reported that, in light of PET results, they were able to avoid further testing in approximately three-fourths of patients (71.8%-74.6%). At the time when the post-PET forms were completed, biopsies of suspicious sites had been performed in 21.2%, 32.4%, and 23.2%, respectively, of Dx, CUP, and PNS cases.

Conclusion

Our analysis of NOPR data shows that PET appears to have a substantial impact on intended management when used for three common diagnostic indications.

Implications for practice

[(18)F]-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography appears to have a substantial impact on intended management when used for three targeted diagnostic indications: (a) determining whether a suspicious lesion is cancer, (b) detecting an unknown primary tumor site in a patient with confirmed or strongly suspected metastatic disease, and (c) detecting a primary tumor site in a patient with a presumed paraneoplastic syndrome.

SUBMITTER: Subramaniam RM 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5016059 | biostudies-literature | 2016 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Impact on Patient Management of [18F]-Fluorodeoxyglucose-Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Used for Cancer Diagnosis: Analysis of Data From the National Oncologic PET Registry.

Subramaniam Rathan M RM   Shields Anthony F AF   Sachedina Archana A   Hanna Lucy L   Duan Fenghai F   Siegel Barry A BA   Hillner Bruce E BE  

The oncologist 20160708 9


<h4>Introduction</h4>We assessed the impact of [(18)F]-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET) on intended management of patients in the National Oncologic PET Registry (NOPR) for three different diagnostic indications: (a) determining whether a suspicious lesion is cancer (Dx), (b) detecting an unknown primary tumor site when there is confirmed or strongly suspected metastatic disease (cancer of unknown primary origin [CUP]), and (c) detecting a primary tumor site when there  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

2020-03-18 | GSE131769 | GEO
2020-03-18 | GSE135565 | GEO
| S-EPMC6882358 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6923299 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC2742744 | biostudies-literature
2011-11-01 | GSE21217 | GEO
| S-EPMC4998336 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8405867 | biostudies-literature
| 2020046 | ecrin-mdr-crc
2015-02-09 | E-MTAB-3175 | biostudies-arrayexpress