Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Choline and betaine consumption lowers cancer risk: a meta-analysis of epidemiologic studies.


ABSTRACT: A number of human and animal in vitro or in vivo studies have investigated the relationship between dietary choline and betaine and cancer risk, suggesting that choline and betaine consumption may be protective for cancer. There are also a few epidemiologic studies exploring this relationship, however, with inconsistent conclusions. The PubMed and Embase were searched, from their inception to March 2016, to identify relevant studies and we brought 11 articles into this meta-analysis eventually. The pooled relative risks (RRs) of cancer for the highest versus the lowest range were 0.82 (95% CI, 0.70 to 0.97) for choline consumption only, 0.86 (95%CI, 0.76 to 0.97) for betaine consumption only and 0.60 (95%CI, 0.40 to 0.90) for choline plus betaine consumption, respectively. Significant protective effect of dietary choline and betaine for cancer was observed when stratified by study design, location, cancer type, publication year, sex and quality score of study. An increment of 100 mg/day of choline plus betaine intake helped reduce cancer incidence by 11% (0.89, 95% CI, 0.87 to 0.92) through a dose-response analysis. To conclude, choline and betaine consumption lowers cancer incidence in this meta-analysis, but further studies are warranted to verify the results.

SUBMITTER: Sun S 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5069558 | biostudies-literature | 2016 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Choline and betaine consumption lowers cancer risk: a meta-analysis of epidemiologic studies.

Sun Shanwen S   Li Xiao X   Ren Anjing A   Du Mulong M   Du Haina H   Shu Yongqian Y   Zhu Lingjun L   Wang Wei W  

Scientific reports 20161019


A number of human and animal in vitro or in vivo studies have investigated the relationship between dietary choline and betaine and cancer risk, suggesting that choline and betaine consumption may be protective for cancer. There are also a few epidemiologic studies exploring this relationship, however, with inconsistent conclusions. The PubMed and Embase were searched, from their inception to March 2016, to identify relevant studies and we brought 11 articles into this meta-analysis eventually.  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC5342000 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6518136 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4060503 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC4451698 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3962437 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7266551 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3815746 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3273353 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC3716767 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5669963 | biostudies-literature