Dataset Information

Making infection prevention education interactive can enhance knowledge and improve outcomes: Results from the Targeted Infection Prevention (TIP) Study.

ABSTRACT: The purpose of this study was to assess effectiveness of an interactive educational program in increasing knowledge of key infection prevention and control (IPC) principles with emphasis on indwelling device care, hand hygiene, and multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) among nursing home (NH) health care personnel (HCP).We conducted a multimodal randomized controlled study involving HCP at 12 NHs. Ten comprehensive and interactive modules covered common IPC topics. We compared intervention and control scores to assess differences in pretest scores as a result of field interventions, pre- and post-test scores to assess knowledge gain, and magnitude of knowledge gain based on job categories.We conducted over 200 in-services across 10 topics at six intervention sites over 36 months. There were 4,962 tests returned over the course of the study, ranging from 389-633 per module. Participants were mostly female certified nursing assistants (CNAs). Score improvement was highest for modules emphasizing hand hygiene, urinary catheter care, and MDROs (15.6%, 15.9%, and 22.0%, respectively). After adjusting for cluster study design, knowledge scores were significantly higher after each educational module, suggesting the education delivery method was effective. When compared with CNAs, nursing and rehabilitation personnel scored significantly higher in their knowledge tests.Our intervention significantly improved IPC knowledge in HCP, especially for those involved in direct patient care. This increase in knowledge along with preemptive barrier precautions and active surveillance has enhanced resident safety by reducing MDROs and infections in high-risk NH residents.

SUBMITTER: Koo E

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5097010 | biostudies-literature | 2016 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Making infection prevention education interactive can enhance knowledge and improve outcomes: Results from the Targeted Infection Prevention (TIP) Study.

Koo Evonne E McNamara Sara S Lansing Bonnie B Olmsted Russell N RN Rye Ruth Anne RA Fitzgerald Thomas T Mody Lona L

American journal of infection control 20160820 11

<h4>Background</h4>The purpose of this study was to assess effectiveness of an interactive educational program in increasing knowledge of key infection prevention and control (IPC) principles with emphasis on indwelling device care, hand hygiene, and multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) among nursing home (NH) health care personnel (HCP).<h4>Methods</h4>We conducted a multimodal randomized controlled study involving HCP at 12 NHs. Ten comprehensive and interactive modules covered common IPC top ...[more]

PMID: 27553671

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundPerinatal anxiety is one of the most common conditions during pregnancy and is associated with adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Interventions that are focused on childbirth education and health literacy have been shown to help decrease pregnancy-related anxiety. These programs, however, have limitations. Transportation, childcare, and work conflicts pose barriers to patients. In addition, many of these programs have not been studied in high-risk patients, who are most at risk for pregnancy-related anxiety. Thus, it is uncertain whether an online childbirth education course can help to improve outcomes in a high-risk patient population.ObjectiveThis study aimed to compare an interactive online platform for childbirth education (Birthly) with usual prenatal education on anxiety, emergency healthcare utilization, and delivery outcomes for high-risk pregnancies.Study designWe performed a randomized trial comparing an interactive online childbirth education platform combined with usual prenatal education (intervention) with usual prenatal education alone (usual care). Nulliparous, English-speaking patients with internet access and a high-risk pregnancy (medical or mental health disorders) were included. Patients in 2 urban clinics that serve underresourced patients were enrolled at <20 weeks of gestation. The intervention included 3 interactive courses (prenatal bootcamp, breastfeeding, newborn care) and access to a clinician-moderated online community. Pregnancy-related Anxiety Scale questionnaires were administered at randomization and at 34 to 40 weeks. The primary outcome was third-trimester Pregnancy-related Anxiety Scale score. Secondary outcomes included change in Pregnancy-related Anxiety Scale score, unscheduled emergency visits, delivery, and postpartum outcomes. To demonstrate a 15% decrease in Pregnancy-related Anxiety Scale score, 37 patients would be needed per group. Accounting for a 20% loss to follow-up rate, we planned to recruit 90 total patients or 45 per group.ResultsA total of 90 patients were randomized with no differences in demographics or baseline Pregnancy-related Anxiety Scale scores. Most patients self-identified as Black and were publicly insured. More than 60% of patients (62.2%) in the intervention arm completed at least 1 Birthly course. Patients in the intervention arm had significantly lower third-trimester Pregnancy-related Anxiety Scale scores (indicating lower anxiety) compared with those receiving usual care (44.6±7.3 vs 53.9±13.8; P<.01), with a decrease in score of 8.3 points vs 0.7 for usual care (P<.01). Patients in the intervention arm also had fewer emergency visits (1 [0-2] vs 2 [1-3]; P=.003). There were no differences in delivery outcomes. Patients in the intervention arm were more likely to breastfeed at delivery, although this was not different by the postpartum visit. Finally, patients who received the intervention were more likely to be satisfied with their childbirth education (94.6% vs 64.9%; P<.01).ConclusionAn interactive online childbirth education platform can reduce pregnancy-related anxiety and emergency healthcare utilization while improving satisfaction in a high-risk patient population.

Project description:BACKGROUND: Hospital-based clinicians and educators face a difficult challenge trying to simultaneously improve measurable quality, educate residents in line with ACGME core competencies, while also attending to fiscal concerns such as hospital length of stay (LOS). OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of multidisciplinary rounds (MDR) on quality core measure performance, resident education, and hospital length of stay. DESIGN: Pre and post observational study assessing the impact of MDR during its first year of implementation. SETTING: The Norwalk Hospital is a 328-bed, university-affiliated community teaching hospital in an urban setting with a total of 44 Internal Medicine residents. METHODS: Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO) core measure performance was obtained on a monthly basis for selected heart failure (CHF), pneumonia, and acute myocardial infarction (AMI) measures addressed on the general medical service. Resident knowledge and attitudes about MDR were determined by an anonymous questionnaire. LOS and monthly core measure performance rates were adjusted for patient characteristics and secular trends using linear spline logistic regression modeling. RESULTS: Institution of MDR was associated with a significant improvement in quality core measure performance in targeted areas of CHF from 65% to 76% (p < .001), AMI from 89% to 96% (p = .004), pneumonia from 27% to 70% (p < .001), and all combined from 59% to 78% (p < .001). Adjusted overall monthly performance rates also improved during MDR (odds ratio [OR] 1.09, CI 1.06-1.12, p < .001). Residents reported substantial improvements in core measure knowledge, systems-based care, and communication after institution of MDR (p < .001). Residents also agreed that MDR improved efficiency, delivery of evidence-based care, and relationships with involved disciplines. Adjusted average LOS decreased 0.5 (95% CI 0.1-0.8) days for patients with a target core measure diagnosis of either CHF, pneumonia, or AMI (p < .01 ) and by 0.6 (95% CI 0.5-0.7) days for all medicine DRGs (p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Resident-centered MDR is an effective process using no additional resources that simultaneously improves quality of care while enhancing resident education and is associated with shortened length of stay.

Project description:IntroductionWe determined if targeted education of emergency physicians (EPs) regarding the treatment of mental illness will improve their comfort level in treating psychiatric patients boarding in the emergency department (ED) awaiting admission.MethodsWe performed a pilot study examining whether an educational intervention would change an EP's comfort level in treating psychiatric boarder patients (PBPs). We identified a set of psychiatric emergencies that typically require admission or treatment beyond the scope of practice of emergency medicine. Diagnoses included major depression, schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar affective disorder, general anxiety disorder, suicidal ideation, and criminal behavior. We designed equivalent surveys to be used before and after an educational intervention. Each survey consisted of 10 scenarios of typical psychiatric patients. EPs were asked to rate their comfort levels in treating the described patients on a visual analogue scale. We calculated summary scores for the non intervention survey group (NINT) and intervention survey group (INT) and compared them using Student's t-test.ResultsSeventy-nine percent (33/42) of eligible participants completed the pre-intervention survey (21 attendings, 12 residents) and comprised the NINT group. Fifty-five percent (23/42) completed the post-intervention survey (16 attendings, 7 residents) comprising the INT group. A comparison of summary scores between 'NINT' and 'INT' groups showed a highly significant improvement in comfort levels with treating the patients described in the scenarios (P = 0.003). Improvements were noted on separate analysis for faculty (P = 0.039) and for residents (P = 0.012). Results of a sensitivity analysis excluding one highly significant scenario showed decreased, but still important differences between the NINT and INT groups for all participants and for residents, but not for faculty (all: P = 0.05; faculty: P = 0.25; residents: P = 0.03).ConclusionThis pilot study suggests that the comfort level of EPs, when asked to treat PBPs, may be improved with education. We believe our data support further study of this idea and of whether an improved comfort level will translate to a willingness to treat.

Dataset Information

Making infection prevention education interactive can enhance knowledge and improve outcomes: Results from the Targeted Infection Prevention (TIP) Study.

Publications

Making infection prevention education interactive can enhance knowledge and improve outcomes: Results from the Targeted Infection Prevention (TIP) Study.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets