Dataset Information

Does spaced education improve clinical knowledge among Family Medicine residents? A cluster randomized controlled trial.

ABSTRACT: Spaced education is a learning strategy to improve knowledge acquisition and retention. To date, no robust evidence exists to support the utility of spaced education in the Family Medicine residency. We aimed to test whether alerts to encourage spaced education can improve clinical knowledge as measured by scores on the Canadian Family Medicine certification examination.

Method

We conducted a cluster randomized controlled trial to empirically and pragmatically test spaced education using two versions of the Family Medicine Study Guide mobile app. 12 residency training programs in Canada agreed to participate. At six intervention sites, we consented 335 of the 654 (51%) eligible residents. Residents in the intervention group were sent alerts through the app to encourage the answering of questions linked to clinical cases. At six control sites, 299 of 586 (51%) residents consented. Residents in the control group received the same app but with no alerts. Incidence rates of case completion between trial arms were compared using repeated measures analysis. We linked residents in both trial arms to their knowledge scores on the certification examination of the College of Family Physicians of Canada.

Results

Over 67 weeks, there was no statistically significant difference in the completion of clinical cases by participants. The difference in mean exam scores and the associated confidence interval did not exceed the pre-defined limit of 4 percentage points.

Conclusion

Further research is recommended before deploying spaced educational interventions in the Family Medicine residency to improve knowledge.

SUBMITTER: Grad R

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8338813 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Does spaced education improve clinical knowledge among Family Medicine residents? A cluster randomized controlled trial.

Grad Roland R Leger Daniel D Kaczorowski Janusz J Schuster Tibor T Adler Samara S Aman Marya M Archibald Douglas D Beaulieu Marie-Claude MC Chmelicek John J Cornelissen Evelyn E Delleman Bethany B Hadj-Mimoune Sonia S Horvey Samantha S Macaluso Steven S Mintsioulis Stephen S Murdoch Stuart S Ng Brian B Papineau Alain A Rangwala Sohil S Rousseau Mathieu M Rudkin Teresa T Schabort Inge I Schultz Karen K Snow Pamela P Wong Eric E Wu Pearson P Brailovsky Carlos C

Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice 20210103 3

Spaced education is a learning strategy to improve knowledge acquisition and retention. To date, no robust evidence exists to support the utility of spaced education in the Family Medicine residency. We aimed to test whether alerts to encourage spaced education can improve clinical knowledge as measured by scores on the Canadian Family Medicine certification examination.<h4>Method</h4>We conducted a cluster randomized controlled trial to empirically and pragmatically test spaced education using ...[more]

PMID: 33389233

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundSpaced education is a novel method that improves medical education through online repetition of core principles often paired with multiple-choice questions. This model is a proven teaching tool for medical students, but its effect on resident learning is less established. We hypothesized that repetition of key clinical concepts in a "Clinical Pearls" format would improve knowledge retention in medical residents.MethodsThis study investigated spaced education with particular emphasis on using a novel, email-based reinforcement program, and a randomized, self-matched design, in which residents were quizzed on medical knowledge that was either reinforced or not with electronically-administered spaced education. Both reinforced and non-reinforced knowledge was later tested with four quizzes.ResultsOverall, respondents incorrectly answered 395 of 1008 questions (0.39; 95% CI, 0.36-0.42). Incorrect response rates varied by quiz (range 0.34-0.49; p = 0.02), but not significantly by post-graduate year (PGY1 0.44, PGY2 0.33, PGY3 0.38; p = 0.08). Although there was no evidence of benefit among residents (RR = 1.01; 95% CI, 0.83-1.22; p = 0.95), we observed a significantly lower risk of incorrect responses to reinforced material among interns (RR = 0.83, 95% CI, 0.70-0.99, p = 0.04).ConclusionsOverall, repetition of Clinical Pearls did not statistically improve test scores amongst junior and senior residents. However, among interns, repetition of the Clinical Pearls was associated with significantly higher test scores, perhaps reflecting their greater attendance at didactic sessions and engagement with Clinical Pearls. Although the study was limited by a low response rate, we employed test and control questions within the same quiz, limiting the potential for selection bias. Further work is needed to determine the optimal spacing and content load of Clinical Pearls to maximize retention amongst medical residents. This particular protocol of spaced education, however, was unique and readily reproducible suggesting its potential efficacy for intern education within a large residency program.

Project description:ContextProstate cancer screening with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is frequently performed, counter to clinical practice guidelines.BackgroundIt was hypothesized that an e-mail-based intervention termed "spaced education" could reduce clinicians' inappropriate screening for prostate cancer.DesignThe study was conducted as an RCT.Setting/participantsThe study involved 95 primary care clinicians in eight Veterans Affairs medical centers from January 2007 to February 2009.InterventionParticipants were randomized into two cohorts: spaced education clinicians received four isomorphic cycles of nine e-mails over 36 weeks (zero to two e-mails per week), whereas control clinicians received no intervention. Each e-mail presented a clinical scenario and asked whether it was appropriate to obtain a PSA test. Participants received immediate feedback after submitting their answers.Main outcome measuresThe primary outcome was the number and percentage of inappropriate PSA screening tests ordered. Inappropriate testing was defined as use of PSA for prostate cancer screening in patients aged >76 or <40 years. Appropriateness of screening was dichotomized based on patient age at time of screening. Patients with PSA testing for non-screening reasons were excluded using a validated protocol. Logistic regression with adjustment for patient clustering by clinician was performed. Analyses were conducted in 2009.ResultsDuring the intervention period (Weeks 1-36), clinicians receiving spaced education e-mails ordered significantly fewer inappropriate PSA screening tests than control clinicians (10.5% vs 14.2%, p=0.041). Over the 72-week period following the intervention (Weeks 37-108), spaced education clinicians continued to order fewer inappropriate tests compared to controls (7.8% vs 13.1%, respectively, p=0.011), representing a 40% relative reduction in inappropriate screening.ConclusionsSpaced education durably improves the prostate cancer screening behaviors of clinicians and represents a promising new methodology to improve patient care across healthcare systems.

Project description:BackgroundPrevious research has strongly supported the utility of spaced learning in enhancing memory, but its effectiveness in complex surgical procedures has largely been unexplored. The main objective of this study was to evaluate whether, in comparison to concentrated learning, spaced learning improves the short-term acquisition and long-term retention of cosmetic suturing skills as outcomes of surgical resident training courses.MethodsThis randomized controlled trial was conducted from February 2023 to June 2023. Surgical residents were recruited from a teaching hospital in Guangzhou, China. The participants were randomly assigned at a 1:1 ratio to either the spaced training group (40 min of training followed by a 20-minute break) or the concentrated training group (3 h of continuous training), in which they received one-on-one training for cosmetic suturing skills. The short-term acquisition and long-term retention outcomes were evaluated by three independent raters using an objective scoring scale to assess the participants' cosmetic suturing skills before the training (pretraining test), within one hour after the training (posttraining test), and three months after the completion of the training (follow-up test). The score for each participant was calculated as the average of three independent scores.ResultsThe study included 23 surgical residents, 12 in the spaced training group and 11 in the concentrated training group. The pretraining test revealed no significant difference between the groups. However, in the post-training test, the spaced training group achieved a significantly higher total score than did the concentrated training group (74.06 ± 5.87 vs. 63.43 ± 10.73, p = 0.0070). Specifically, the suture technique scores were 28.46 ± 1.78 and 22.85 ± 3.75, respectively, which were significantly different (p = 0.0002). During the long-term follow-up test, the spaced training group consistently outperformed the concentrated training group by having significantly higher total (75.60 ± 4.78 vs. 60.68 ± 10.40, p = 0.0001), suture quality (32.26 ± 4.01 vs. 26.23 ± 4.16, p = 0.0019), suture technique (28.68 ± 2.63 vs. 22.18 ± 3.94, p = 0.0001), and suturing time scores (14.67 ± 1.15 vs. 12.27 ± 6.07, p = 0.0460).ConclusionsIncorporating the principles of spaced learning into the instructional process of obtaining cosmetic suture skills for surgical residents not only significantly enhances short-term skill improvement but also contributes to the long-term retention of training outcomes.

Dataset Information

Does spaced education improve clinical knowledge among Family Medicine residents? A cluster randomized controlled trial.

Method

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Does spaced education improve clinical knowledge among Family Medicine residents? A cluster randomized controlled trial.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets