Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Systematic comparison of monoclonal versus polyclonal antibodies for mapping histone modifications by ChIP-seq.


ABSTRACT: The robustness of ChIP-seq datasets is highly dependent upon the antibodies used. Currently, polyclonal antibodies are the standard despite several limitations: They are non-renewable, vary in performance between lots and need to be validated with each new lot. In contrast, monoclonal antibody lots are renewable and provide consistent performance. To increase ChIP-seq standardization, we investigated whether monoclonal antibodies could replace polyclonal antibodies. We compared monoclonal antibodies that target five key histone modifications (H3K4me1, H3K4me3, H3K9me3, H3K27ac and H3K27me3) to their polyclonal counterparts in both human and mouse cells.Overall performance was highly similar for four monoclonal/polyclonal pairs, including when we used two distinct lots of the same monoclonal antibody. In contrast, the binding patterns for H3K27ac differed substantially between polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies. However, this was most likely due to the distinct immunogen used rather than the clonality of the antibody.Altogether, we found that monoclonal antibodies as a class perform equivalently to polyclonal antibodies for the detection of histone post-translational modifications in both human and mouse. Accordingly, we recommend the use of monoclonal antibodies in ChIP-seq experiments.

SUBMITTER: Busby M 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5097419 | biostudies-literature | 2016

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Systematic comparison of monoclonal versus polyclonal antibodies for mapping histone modifications by ChIP-seq.

Busby Michele M   Xue Catherine C   Li Catherine C   Farjoun Yossi Y   Gienger Elizabeth E   Yofe Ido I   Gladden Adrianne A   Epstein Charles B CB   Cornett Evan M EM   Rothbart Scott B SB   Nusbaum Chad C   Goren Alon A  

Epigenetics & chromatin 20161104


<h4>Background</h4>The robustness of ChIP-seq datasets is highly dependent upon the antibodies used. Currently, polyclonal antibodies are the standard despite several limitations: They are non-renewable, vary in performance between lots and need to be validated with each new lot. In contrast, monoclonal antibody lots are renewable and provide consistent performance. To increase ChIP-seq standardization, we investigated whether monoclonal antibodies could replace polyclonal antibodies. We compare  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC4174756 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4053718 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8961045 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4666908 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7523640 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4267652 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10730160 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3239327 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6019315 | biostudies-literature
2016-03-02 | E-GEOD-66530 | biostudies-arrayexpress