Dataset Information

Pulsed radiofrequency attenuates diabetic neuropathic pain and suppresses formalin-evoked spinal glutamate release in rats.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) has been used to treat chronic pain for years, but its effectiveness and mechanism in treating diabetic neuropathic pain are still unexplored. The aim of this study was to elucidate the modulation of diabetic neuropathic pain induced by streptozotocin and the release of spinal excitatory amino acids by PRF.

Methods

Diabetes was induced by intraperitoneal administration of streptozotocin. Pulsed radiofrequency was applied to L5 and L6 dorsal roots at 42 °C for 2 min. The responses of all of the groups to thermal, mechanical and cold stimuli were measured for a period of 6 d after this process. Seven days after PRF treatment, intrathecal microdialysis was used to examine the effect of pulsed radiofrequency on the formalin-evoked spinal release of excitatory amino acids and concurrent behaviour responses from diabetic rats.

Results

Three weeks after intraperitoneal streptozotocin treatment and before PRF application, mechanical, thermal and cold hypersensitivity occurred. Application of PRF significantly alleviated hyperglycaemia-induced mechanical, thermal and cold hypersensitivity and also attenuated the increase in formalin-evoked CSF glutamate concentration, compared with sham treated diabetic rats.

Conclusion

It may be concluded that PRF has an analgesic effect on neuropathic pain by suppressing the nociception-induced release of excitatory neurotransmitters. PRF may provide a novel promising therapeutic approach for managing diabetic neuropathic pain.

SUBMITTER: Huang YH

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5165693 | biostudies-literature | 2016

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Pulsed radiofrequency attenuates diabetic neuropathic pain and suppresses formalin-evoked spinal glutamate release in rats.

Huang Yu-Hsin YH Hou Shao-Yun SY Cheng Jen-Kun JK Wu Chih-Hsien CH Lin Chung-Ren CR

International journal of medical sciences 20161208 12

<h4>Background</h4>Pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) has been used to treat chronic pain for years, but its effectiveness and mechanism in treating diabetic neuropathic pain are still unexplored. The aim of this study was to elucidate the modulation of diabetic neuropathic pain induced by streptozotocin and the release of spinal excitatory amino acids by PRF.<h4>Methods</h4>Diabetes was induced by intraperitoneal administration of streptozotocin. Pulsed radiofrequency was applied to L5 and L6 dorsal r ...[more]

PMID: 27994505

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND:Pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) is a minimally invasive interventional technique that provides a novel and effective treatment strategy for neuropathic pain (NP). PRF is advantageous because it does not damage nerves and avoids sensory loss after treatment. At present, animal studies have demonstrated that PRF is safe and effective for relieving the NP associated with sciatic nerve damage in rats with chronic constriction injury (CCI). However, the mechanism through which this effect occurs is unknown. An increasing body of evidence shows that the expression of the P2X ligand-gated ion channel 3 (P2X3) receptor is closely related to NP; this study was to investigate whether the expression of this receptor is involved in NP relief due to PRF. METHODS:A total of 36 healthy adult male Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats were randomly divided into three groups: Sham group, CCI group, and PRF group. The right sciatic nerve was ligated in CCI group and PRF group to establish a CCI model; the right sciatic nerve was separated but not ligated in Sham group. On day 14 after the operation, PRF was administered to the ligated sciatic nerve in PRF group (42°C, 45 V, 2 min). A non-live electrode was placed at the exposed sciatic nerve for the rats in Sham and CCI groups. The hindpaw withdrawal threshold (HWT) and thermal withdrawal latency (TWL) were measured at the right hindpaw at different time points before and after PRF or sham therapy. On day 28 after treatment, the dorsal root ganglion (DRG) and spinal dorsal horn of the right L4-6 were harvested from each group to determine the mRNA and protein levels of the P2X3 receptor. RESULTS:On day 28 after PRF treatment, the HWT (8.33?±?0.67?g vs. 3.62?±?0.48?g) and TWL (25.42?±?1.90?s vs. 15.10?±?1.71?s) were significantly higher in PRF group as compared to CCI group (P?<?0.05). The mRNA expression of the P2X3 receptor in the DRG in PRF group was 23.7% lower than that in CCI group (P?<?0.05), in the spinal dorsal horns in PRF group was 22.7% lower than that in CCI group (P?<?0.05). The protein expression of the P2X3 receptor in the DRG in PRF group was 27.8% lower than that in CCI group (P?<?0.05), in the spinal dorsal horns in PRF group was 35.6% lower than that in CCI group (P?<?0.05). CONCLUSION:PRF possibly reduces NP in CCI rats by inhibiting the expression of the P2X3 receptor in the L4-6 DRG and spinal dorsal horns.

Project description:Aim of investigation:Pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) is a safe and effective approach for treating neuropathic pain. However, the optimal treatment conditions and analgesic mechanisms of PRF remain unclear. The aim of our study was to assess the beneficial and adverse effects of prolonged-duration PRF and the analgesic mechanisms of PRF treatment with neuropathic pain rats. Methods:Male Sprague Dawley rats received L5 spinal nerve ligation (SNL) for developing neuropathic pain. Fourteen days after L5 SNL surgery, they were divided into three groups according to duration of PRF current for 6 minutes, 12 minutes, and none. PRF current was delivered via direct visualization adjacent to the L5 dorsal root ganglion (DRG). Pain behavior was evaluated every week after L5 SNL surgery, until day 28. Seven days after PRF treatment, L5 DRG tissue was harvested to detect levels of activating translation factor 3 (ATF3; a marker of neuronal damage) and hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide (HCN)-gated cation channels (key factors in neuropathic pain) using quantitative PCR. Results:Before PRF application, withdrawal thresholds were significantly lower than at baseline and did not differ significantly between the three groups. After PRF application, withdrawal thresholds in the PRF6 and PRF12 groups were significantly increased compared to those in the sham group. However, those in the PRF6 and PRF12 groups did not differ significantly. The expression level of ATF3 mRNA in the PRF12 group was significantly higher than that in the sham group (P<0.01), but the expression of HCN1 and HCN2 channels did not differ significantly between the three groups. Conclusion:Prolonged PRF exposure, from 6 to 12 minutes, was not only ineffective but also associated with increased neuronal damage. These findings do not support prolonged PRF exposure as a helpful treatment for neuropathic pain. In this study, the involvement of HCN channels in the antiallodynic effects of PRF was uncertain.

Project description:BACKGROUND:We systematically reviewed the evidence on the efficacy and safety of dorsal root ganglion (DRG) targeted pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) versus any comparator for treatment of non-neuropathic pain. METHODS:We searched MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO, clinicaltrials.gov and WHO clinical trial register until January 8, 2019. All study designs were eligible. Two authors independently conducted literature screening. Primary outcomes were pain intensity and serious adverse events (SAEs). Secondary outcomes were any other pain-related outcome and any other safety outcome that was reported. We assessed the risk of bias using the Cochrane tool and Risk of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I). We conducted narrative evidence synthesis and assessed the conclusiveness of included studies regarding efficacy and safety. RESULTS:We included 17 studies with 599 participants, which analyzed various pain syndromes. Two studies were randomized controlled trials; both included participants with low back pain (LBP). Non-randomized studies included patients with the following indications: LBP, postsurgical pain, pain associated with herpes zoster, cervicogenic headache, complex regional pain syndrome type 1, intractable vertebral metastatic pain, chronic scrotal and inguinal pain, occipital radiating pain in rheumatoid arthritis and chronic migraine. In these studies, the PRF was usually initiated after other treatments have failed. Eleven studies had positive conclusive statements (11/17) about efficacy; the remaining had positive inconclusive statements. Only three studies provided conclusiveness of evidence statements regarding safety - two indicated that the evidence was positive conclusive, and one positive inconclusive. The risk of bias was predominantly unclear in randomized and serious in non-randomized studies. CONCLUSION:Poor quality and few participants characterize evidence about benefits and harms of DRG PRF in patients with non-neuropathic pain. Results from available studies should only be considered preliminary. Not all studies have reported data regarding the safety of the intervention, but those that did, indicate that the intervention is relatively safe. As the procedure is non-destructive and early results are promising, further comparative studies about PRF in non-neuropathic pain syndromes would be welcomed.

Dataset Information

Pulsed radiofrequency attenuates diabetic neuropathic pain and suppresses formalin-evoked spinal glutamate release in rats.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Pulsed radiofrequency attenuates diabetic neuropathic pain and suppresses formalin-evoked spinal glutamate release in rats.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure