Dataset Information

The Accuracy of Portable Monitoring in Diagnosing Significant Sleep Disordered Breathing in Hospitalized Patients.

ABSTRACT: Polysomnograms are not always feasible when sleep disordered breathing (SDB) is suspected in hospitalized patients. Portable monitoring is a practical alternative; however, it has not been recommended in patients with comorbidities.We evaluated the accuracy of portable monitoring in hospitalized patients suspected of having SDB.Prospective observational study.Large, public, urban, teaching hospital in the United States.Hospitalized patients suspected of having SDB.Patients underwent portable monitoring combined with actigraphy during the hospitalization and then polysomnography after discharge. We determined the accuracy of portable monitoring in predicting moderate to severe SDB and the agreement between the apnea hypopnea index measured by portable monitor (AHIPM) and by polysomnogram (AHIPSG).Seventy-one symptomatic patients completed both tests. The median time between the two tests was 97 days (IQR 25-75: 24-109). Forty-five percent were hospitalized for cardiovascular disease. Mean age was 52±10 years, 41% were women, and the majority had symptoms of SDB. Based on AHIPSG, SDB was moderate in 9 patients and severe in 39. The area under the receiver operator characteristics curve for AHIPM was 0.8, and increased to 0.86 in patients without central sleep apnea; it was 0.88 in the 31 patients with hypercapnia. For predicting moderate to severe SDB, an AHIPM of 14 had a sensitivity of 90%, and an AHIPM of 36 had a specificity of 87%. The mean±SD difference between AHIPM and AHIPSG was 2±29 event/hr.In hospitalized, symptomatic patients, portable monitoring is reasonably accurate in detecting moderate to severe SDB.

SUBMITTER: Nagubadi S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5167272 | biostudies-literature | 2016

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

The Accuracy of Portable Monitoring in Diagnosing Significant Sleep Disordered Breathing in Hospitalized Patients.

Nagubadi Swamy S Mehta Rohit R Abdoh Mamoun M Nagori Mohammedumer M Littleton Stephen S Gueret Renaud R Tulaimat Aiman A

PloS one 20161219 12

<h4>Background</h4>Polysomnograms are not always feasible when sleep disordered breathing (SDB) is suspected in hospitalized patients. Portable monitoring is a practical alternative; however, it has not been recommended in patients with comorbidities.<h4>Objective</h4>We evaluated the accuracy of portable monitoring in hospitalized patients suspected of having SDB.<h4>Design</h4>Prospective observational study.<h4>Setting</h4>Large, public, urban, teaching hospital in the United States.<h4>Parti ...[more]

PMID: 27992566

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundGreater awareness of sleep-disordered breathing and rising obesity rates have fueled demand for sleep studies. Sleep testing using level 3 portable devices may expedite diagnosis and reduce the costs associated with level 1 in-laboratory polysomnography. We sought to assess the diagnostic accuracy of level 3 testing compared with level 1 testing and to identify the appropriate patient population for each test.MethodsWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies of level 3 versus level 1 sleep tests in adults with suspected sleep-disordered breathing. We searched 3 research databases and grey literature sources for studies that reported on diagnostic accuracy parameters or disease management after diagnosis. Two reviewers screened the search results, selected potentially relevant studies and extracted data. We used a bivariate mixed-effects binary regression model to estimate summary diagnostic accuracy parameters.ResultsWe included 59 studies involving a total of 5026 evaluable patients (mostly patients suspected of having obstructive sleep apnea). Of these, 19 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The estimated area under the receiver operating characteristics curve was high, ranging between 0.85 and 0.99 across different levels of disease severity. Summary sensitivity ranged between 0.79 and 0.97, and summary specificity ranged between 0.60 and 0.93 across different apnea-hypopnea cut-offs. We saw no significant difference in the clinical management parameters between patients who underwent either test to receive their diagnosis.InterpretationLevel 3 portable devices showed good diagnostic performance compared with level 1 sleep tests in adult patients with a high pretest probability of moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea and no unstable comorbidities. For patients suspected of having other types of sleep-disordered breathing or sleep disorders not related to breathing, level 1 testing remains the reference standard.

Project description:Sleep disordered breathing (SDB) is highly prevalent, but frequently unrecognized among stroke patients. Polysomnography (PSG) is difficult to perform soon after a stroke. We evaluated the use of screening questionnaires and portable sleep testing (PST) for patients with acute stroke, subarachnoid hemorrhage, or transient ischemic attack to expedite SDB diagnosis and management. We performed a single-center retrospective analysis of a quality improvement study on SDB screening of consecutive daytime, weekday, adult admissions to a stroke unit. We excluded patients who were unable to communicate and lacked available family members. Patients were screened with the Epworth Sleepiness Scale, Berlin Questionnaire, and STOP-BANG Questionnaire and underwent overnight PST and/or outpatient PSG. The 4-item STOP Questionnaire was derived from STOP-BANG for a secondary analysis. We compared the sensitivity and specificity of the questionnaires for the diagnosis of at least mild SDB (apnea hypopnea index (AHI) ≥5) on PST and correlated AHI measurements between PST and PSG using the Spearman correlation. Out of sixty-eight patients included in the study, 54 (80%) were diagnosed with SDB. Only one (1.5%) had a previous SDB diagnosis. Thirty-three patients completed all questionnaires and a PST. The STOP-BANG questionnaire had the highest sensitivity for at least mild SDB (0.81, 95% CI (confidence interval): 0.65-0.92) but a low specificity (0.33, 95% CI 0.10, 0.65). The discrimination of all questionnaires was overall poor (C statistic range 0.502-0.640). There was a strong correlation (r = 0.71) between the AHI results estimated using PST and outpatient PSG among 28 patients. The 4-item STOP Questionnaire was the easiest to administer and had a comparable or better sensitivity than the other questionnaires. Inpatient PSTs were useful for screening in the acute setting to facilitate an early diagnosis of SDB and to establish further outpatient evaluations with sleep medicine.

Dataset Information

The Accuracy of Portable Monitoring in Diagnosing Significant Sleep Disordered Breathing in Hospitalized Patients.

Publications

The Accuracy of Portable Monitoring in Diagnosing Significant Sleep Disordered Breathing in Hospitalized Patients.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets