Dataset Information

Ambulatory circadian monitoring in sleep disordered breathing patients and CPAP treatment.

ABSTRACT: Our aim was to evaluate the circadian rhythm of motor activity, body position and integrated variable TAP (composed by wrist Temperature, motor Activity and body Position) in Sleep Disordered Breathing (SDB), its relation to SDB severity and the effect of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) on these circadian rhythms. To do this, we monitored motor activity and body position rhythms of 78 SDB patients (53.3 ± 1.2 years old, 26.9% women) and 32 healthy subjects (51.4 ± 3.2 years old, 43.8% women) for 1 week. On the last day of that week, SDB patients underwent a polysomnography followed by a Maintenance of Wakefulness Test, Multiple Sleep Latency Test and Sustained Attention to Response Task protocol. A subgroup of 18 moderate to severe SDB patients was treated with CPAP and monitored again after 3 months under treatment. A non-parametrical analysis was performed to characterize the circadian patterns to assess differences between groups and associations between sleep and circadian parameters. Circadian variables were altered in SDB, exhibiting a direct relationship to SDB severity. The motor activity pattern showed a clear improvement with CPAP treatment. Thus, circadian ambulatory monitoring, including the integrated variable TAP, could be used to evaluate the circadian alterations caused by SDB and activity pattern to monitor the effect of CPAP treatment.

SUBMITTER: Martinez-Nicolas A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8290024 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Between 1982 and 2006, there were 89 distinct publications dealing with oral appliance therapy involving a total of 3,027 patients, which reported results of sleep studies performed with and without the appliance. These studies, which constitute a very heterogeneous group in terms of methodology and patient population, are reviewed and the results summarized. This review focused on the following outcomes: sleep apnea (i.e. reduction in the apnea/hypopnea index or respiratory disturbance index), ability of oral appliances to reduce snoring, effect of oral appliances on daytime function, comparison of oral appliances with other treatments (continuous positive airway pressure and surgery), side effects, dental changes (overbite and overjet), and long-term compliance. We found that the success rate, defined as the ability of the oral appliances to reduce apnea/hypopnea index to less than 10, is 54%. The response rate, defined as at least 50% reduction in the initial apnea/hypopnea index (although it still remained above 10), is 21%. When only the results of randomized, crossover, placebo-controlled studies are considered, the success and response rates are 50% and 14%, respectively. Snoring was reduced by 45%. In the studies comparing oral appliances to continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) or to uvulopalatopharyngoplasty (UPPP), an appliance reduced initial AHI by 42%, CPAP reduced it by 75%, and UPPP by 30%. The majority of patients prefer using oral appliance than CPAP. Use of oral appliances improves daytime function somewhat; the Epworth sleepiness score (ESS) dropped from 11.2 to 7.8 in 854 patients. A summary of the follow-up compliance data shows that at 30 months, 56-68% of patients continue to use oral appliance. Side effects are relatively minor but frequent. The most common ones are excessive salivation and teeth discomfort. Efficacy and side effects depend on the type of appliance, degree of protrusion, vertical opening, and other settings. We conclude that oral appliances, although not as effective as CPAP in reducing sleep apnea, snoring, and improving daytime function, have a definite role in the treatment of snoring and sleep apnea.

Project description:BackgroundSleep-disordered breathing (SDB) is a highly common comorbidity in patients with heart failure (HF), and a known risk factor for ventricular tachycardia (VT) development. However, little is known about the impact of SDB treatment on VT burden in HF patients to date. Therefore, this study investigated VT burden, as well as implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapies in HF patients with SDB treatment, in comparison to untreated SDB HF patients.MethodsThis retrospective study analyzed VT burden, rate of antitachycardia pacing (ATP), and the number of shocks delivered in a propensity score-matched patient cohort of patients with SDB treatment or control. Patients had moderate or severe SDB (n = 73 per each group; standardized mean difference of 0.08) and were followed for a minimum of one year. In addition, survival over 4 years was assessed.ResultsMean patient age was 67.67 ± 10.78 and 67.2 ± 10.10, respectively, with 15.06% and 10.95% of the patients, respectively, being female. Regarding SDB subtypes in the control and SDB treatment group, central sleep apnea was present in 42.46% and 41.09% of the patients, respectively, and obstructive sleep apnea was present in 26.02% and 31.50% of the patients, respectively. Mixed type sleep disorder was present in 31.50% and 27.40% of cases. Among the SDB treatment group, a significantly lower number of VTs (28.8% vs. 68.5%; p = 0.01), ATP (21.9% vs. 50.7%; p = 0.02), as well as a lower shock rate (5.5% vs. 31.5%; p < 0.01), was observed compared to the control group. Furthermore, the VT burden was significantly lower in the SDB treatment group when compared to the time prior to SDB treatment (p = 0.02). Event-free survival was significantly higher in the SDB treatment group (Log-rank p < 0.01).ConclusionSDB treatment in HF patients with ICD leads to significant improvements in VT burden, ATP and shock therapy, and may even affect survival. Thus, HF patients should be generously screened for SDB and treated appropriately.

Dataset Information

Ambulatory circadian monitoring in sleep disordered breathing patients and CPAP treatment.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets