Dataset Information

Comparison of TST and IGRA in Diagnosis of Latent Tuberculosis Infection in a High TB-Burden Setting.

ABSTRACT:

Background

There are currently two tests for diagnosing latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI); TST and IGRA. However, it is still unclear that which one of these tests performs better in high TB-burden settings.

Methods

1511 household contacts of pulmonary TB patients were enrolled to compare the performance of TST and IGRA for LTBI. At baseline all participant underwent testing for IGRA [QuantiFERON-TB® Gold In-tube (QFT-GIT) assay] and TST [2 tuberculin unit (TU), purified protein derivative (PPD), RT23, Staten Serum Institute (SSI), Copenhagen, Denmark]. All the household contacts were followed-up for two years for incident TB cases.

Results

Active TB was diagnosed in 76 household contacts at an incidence rate of 2.14 per 1000 person-years. Both, TST [Hazard Ratio (HR): 1.14, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.72-1.79, p = 0.57], as well as QFT-GIT assay (HR: 1.66, 95% CI: 0.97-2.84, p = 0.06) results at baseline were not significantly associated with subsequent development of active TB among household contacts of pulmonary TB patients.

Conclusion

Neither TST nor IGRA predicted subsequent development of active TB among household contacts of pulmonary TB patients during follow-up. However, keeping in view the cost, and other logistics, TST remains the most preferred method for LTBI diagnosis in resource-limited, high TB-burden settings.

SUBMITTER: Sharma SK

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5218498 | biostudies-literature | 2017

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Comparison of TST and IGRA in Diagnosis of Latent Tuberculosis Infection in a High TB-Burden Setting.

Sharma Surendra K SK Vashishtha Richa R Chauhan L S LS Sreenivas V V Seth Divya D

PloS one 20170106 1

<h4>Background</h4>There are currently two tests for diagnosing latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI); TST and IGRA. However, it is still unclear that which one of these tests performs better in high TB-burden settings.<h4>Methods</h4>1511 household contacts of pulmonary TB patients were enrolled to compare the performance of TST and IGRA for LTBI. At baseline all participant underwent testing for IGRA [QuantiFERON-TB® Gold In-tube (QFT-GIT) assay] and TST [2 tuberculin unit (TU), purified protei ...[more]

PMID: 28060926

Similar Datasets

Project description:This study aims to compare the latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) screening strategy of interferon-gamma release assay (IGRA)-alone and in combination with tuberculin skin tests (TSTs) before the initiation of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitor treatment in patients with inflammatory arthritis. Between January 2011 and June 2017, we enrolled 476 patients who were followed up for ?1 year after the TNF inhibitor initiation in a tertiary referral center in South Korea. Inflammatory arthritis comprised rheumatoid arthritis in 266 (55.9%) and ankylosing spondylitis in 210 (44.1%) patients. The following strategies were used for LTBI screening during the study period: (i) from January 2011 to October 2014, the combination of TST and QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube (QFT-GIT); (ii) between November 2014 and February 2015, QFT-GIT-alone and (iii) since March 2015, either the combination of TST and QFT-GIT or QFT-GIT-alone depending on the attending physician's choice. We compared the screening strategies of QFT-GIT alone and in combination with TST. Overall, 338 (71.0%) patients received LTBI screening tests using the combination of TST and QFT-GIT, and 138 (29.0%) received QFT-GIT-alone. In addition, the LTBI tests were positive in 159 (47.0%) of 338 patients using the combination tests, and 43.8% (148/338) required LTBI treatment. Meanwhile, the LTBI tests were positive in 32.6% (45/138) of QFT-GIT-alone patients, and 30.4% (42/138) required LTBI treatment. Among 338 patients who received combination tests, 2 patients developed active tuberculosis within 1 year after the TNF inhibitor initiation. Of patients who received QFT-GIT-alone, no patient developed tuberculosis. In conclusion, among patients who received QFT-GIT-alone, the number of patients who required LTBI treatment declined compared to the TST and QFT-GIT combination, and none developed active tuberculosis within 1 year, suggesting that QFT-GIT-alone could be a potential screening strategy for diagnosing LTBI in patients with inflammatory arthritis in South Korea.

Project description:BackgroundWorld Health Organization (WHO) recommends systematic screening of high-risk populations, including household contacts (HHCs) of adult pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) patients, as a key strategy for elimination of TB. QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube (QFT-GIT) assay and tuberculin skin test (TST) are two commonly used tools for the detection of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) but may yield differential results, affecting eligibility for TB preventive therapy.Materials and methodsA prospective cohort study of adult pulmonary TB patients and their HHCs were recruited in 2 cities of India, Pune and Chennai. HHCs underwent QFT-GIT (QIAGEN) and TST (PPD SPAN 2TU/5TU). A positive QFT-GIT was defined as value ?0.35 IU/ml and a positive TST as an induration of ?5 mm. A secondary outcome of TST induration ?10mm was explored. Proportion positive by either or both assays, discordant positives and negatives were calculated; test concordance was assessed using percentage agreement and kappa statistics; and risk factors for concordance and discordance including age categories were assessed using logistic regression. Sensitivity and specificity was estimated by latent class model.ResultsOf 1048 HHCs enrolled, 869 [median (IQR) age: 27 years (15-40)] had both TST and QFT-GIT results available and prevalence of LTBI by QFT-GIT was 54% [95% CI (51, 57)], by TST was 55% [95% CI (52, 58)], by either test was 74% [95% CI (71, 77) and by both tests was 35% [95% CI (31, 38)]. Discordance of TST+/QFT-GIT- was 21% while TST-/QFT-GIT+ was 26%. Poor to fair agreement occurred with TST 5mm or 10mm cutoff (60 and 61% agreement with kappa value of 0.20 and 0.25 respectively). Test agreement varied by age, TST strength and induration cut-off. In multivariate analysis, span PPD was a risk factor for QFT-GIT+ and TST- while absence of BCG scar was for TST+ and QFT-GIT-. Being employed and exposure to TB case outside the household case were associated with positivity by both the tests. Sensitivity of TST and QFT-GIT to diagnose LTBI was 77% and 69%. Probability of having LTBI was >90% when both tests were positive irrespective of exposure gradient.ConclusionPrevalence of LTBI among HHCs of adult pulmonary TB patients in India is very high and varies by test type, age, and exposure gradient. In our high TB burden setting, a strategy to treat all HHCs or a targeted strategy whereby an exposure index is used should be assessed in future preventive therapy and vaccine studies as HHCs have several factors that place them at high risk for progression to TB disease.

Dataset Information

Comparison of TST and IGRA in Diagnosis of Latent Tuberculosis Infection in a High TB-Burden Setting.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Comparison of TST and IGRA in Diagnosis of Latent Tuberculosis Infection in a High TB-Burden Setting.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets