Dataset Information

Second monotherapy in childhood absence epilepsy.

ABSTRACT: To determine optimal second monotherapy for children with childhood absence epilepsy (CAE) experiencing initial treatment failure.Children with CAE experiencing treatment failure during the double-blind phase of a randomized controlled trial comparing ethosuximide, valproic acid, and lamotrigine were randomized to open-label second monotherapy with one of the 2 other study therapies. Primary study outcome was freedom from failure proportion at week 16-20 and month 12 visits after randomization. Secondary study outcome was percentage of participants experiencing attentional dysfunction at these visits.A total of 208 children were enrolled, randomized, and received second therapy. At both week 16-20 visit and month 12 visit, ethosuximide's (63%, 57%) and valproic acid's (65%, 49%) freedom from failure proportions were similar to each other and higher than lamotrigine's (45%, 36%, p = 0.051 and p = 0.062). At both time points, ethosuximide and valproic acid had superior seizure control compared to lamotrigine (p < 0.0001). At both the week 16-20 and month 12 visits, attentional dysfunction was numerically more common with valproic acid than with ethosuximide or lamotrigine. For each medication, second monotherapy freedom from failure proportions demonstrated noninferiority to initial monotherapy freedom from failure proportions.As second monotherapy, ethosuximide and valproic acid, demonstrated higher freedom from failure proportions and greater efficacy than lamotrigine; valproic acid was associated with more attentional dysfunction. Ethosuximide is the optimal second monotherapy for children with CAE not responding to initial therapy with other medications.NCT00088452.This study provides Class III evidence that for children with CAE experiencing initial treatment failure, second monotherapy with ethosuximide or valproic acid is superior to lamotrigine.

SUBMITTER: Cnaan A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5224720 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Second monotherapy in childhood absence epilepsy.

Cnaan Avital A Shinnar Shlomo S Arya Ravindra R Adamson Peter C PC Clark Peggy O PO Dlugos Dennis D Hirtz Deborah G DG Masur David D Glauser Tracy A TA

Neurology 20161216 2

<h4>Objective</h4>To determine optimal second monotherapy for children with childhood absence epilepsy (CAE) experiencing initial treatment failure.<h4>Methods</h4>Children with CAE experiencing treatment failure during the double-blind phase of a randomized controlled trial comparing ethosuximide, valproic acid, and lamotrigine were randomized to open-label second monotherapy with one of the 2 other study therapies. Primary study outcome was freedom from failure proportion at week 16-20 and mon ...[more]

PMID: 27986874

Similar Datasets

Project description:OBJECTIVE:To determine whether common polymorphisms in CACNA1G, CACNA1H, CACNA1I, and ABCB1 are associated with differential short-term seizure outcome in childhood absence epilepsy (CAE). METHODS:Four hundred forty-six CAE children in a randomized double-blind trial of ethosuximide, lamotrigine, and valproate had short-term seizure outcome determined. Associations between polymorphisms (minor allele frequency???15%) in 4 genes and seizure outcomes were assessed. In vitro electrophysiology on transfected CACNA1H channels determined impact of 1 variant on T-type calcium channel responsiveness to ethosuximide. RESULTS:Eighty percent (357 of 446) of subjects had informative short-term seizure status (242 seizure free, 115 not seizure free). In ethosuximide subjects, 2 polymorphisms (CACNA1H rs61734410/P640L, CACNA1I rs3747178) appeared more commonly among not-seizure-free participants (p?=?0.011, odds ratio [OR]?=?2.63, 95% confidence limits [CL]?=?1.25-5.56; p?=?0.026, OR?=?2.38, 95% CL?=?1.11-5.00). In lamotrigine subjects, 1 ABCB1 missense polymorphism (rs2032582/S893A; p?=?0.015, OR?=?2.22, 95% CL?=?1.16-4.17) was more common in not-seizure-free participants, and 2 CACNA1H polymorphisms (rs2753326, rs2753325) were more common in seizure-free participants (p?=?0.038, OR?=?0.52, 95% CL?=?0.28-0.96). In valproate subjects, no common polymorphisms were associated with seizure status. In vitro electrophysiological studies showed no effect of the P640L polymorphism on channel physiology in the absence of ethosuximide. Ethosuximide's effect on rate of decay of CaV 3.2 was significantly less for P640L channel compared to wild-type channel. INTERPRETATION:Four T-type calcium channel variants and 1 ABCB1 transporter variant were associated with differential drug response in CAE. The in vivo P640L variant's ethosuximide effect was confirmed by in vitro electrophysiological studies. This suggests that genetic variation plays a role in differential CAE drug response. Ann Neurol 2017;81:444-453.

Project description:BackgroundChildhood absence epilepsy, the most common pediatric epilepsy syndrome, is usually treated with ethosuximide, valproic acid, or lamotrigine. The most efficacious and tolerable initial empirical treatment has not been defined.MethodsIn a double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial, we compared the efficacy, tolerability, and neuropsychological effects of ethosuximide, valproic acid, and lamotrigine in children with newly diagnosed childhood absence epilepsy. Drug doses were incrementally increased until the child was free of seizures, the maximal allowable or highest tolerable dose was reached, or a criterion indicating treatment failure was met. The primary outcome was freedom from treatment failure after 16 weeks of therapy; the secondary outcome was attentional dysfunction. Differential drug effects were determined by means of pairwise comparisons.ResultsThe 453 children who were randomly assigned to treatment with ethosuximide (156), lamotrigine (149), or valproic acid (148) were similar with respect to their demographic characteristics. After 16 weeks of therapy, the freedom-from-failure rates for ethosuximide and valproic acid were similar (53% and 58%, respectively; odds ratio with valproic acid vs. ethosuximide, 1.26; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.80 to 1.98; P=0.35) and were higher than the rate for lamotrigine (29%; odds ratio with ethosuximide vs. lamotrigine, 2.66; 95% CI, 1.65 to 4.28; odds ratio with valproic acid vs. lamotrigine, 3.34; 95% CI, 2.06 to 5.42; P<0.001 for both comparisons). There were no significant differences among the three drugs with regard to discontinuation because of adverse events. Attentional dysfunction was more common with valproic acid than with ethosuximide (in 49% of the children vs. 33%; odds ratio, 1.95; 95% CI, 1.12 to 3.41; P=0.03).ConclusionsEthosuximide and valproic acid are more effective than lamotrigine in the treatment of childhood absence epilepsy. Ethosuximide is associated with fewer adverse attentional effects. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00088452.)

Dataset Information

Second monotherapy in childhood absence epilepsy.

Publications

Second monotherapy in childhood absence epilepsy.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets