Dataset Information

Long-term use of dual antiplatelet therapy for the secondary prevention of atherothrombotic events: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

ABSTRACT: The potential benefit of long-term dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for secondary prevention of atherothrombotic events is unclear. Data from different randomized controlled trials (RCT) using different agents in different subgroups showed inconsistent results.We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis from RCTs that tested different prolonged durations of DAPT for secondary prevention. Long term DAPT arm was defined as those receiving DAPT for more than 12months. Long-term aspirin arm was defined as those receiving either aspirin alone long term or DAPT for less than 12months.The use of long term DAPT was associated with a significant decrease in composite of death, myocardial infarction (MI) and stroke (6.08% vs. 6.71%; odds ratio OR=0.86 [0.78-0.94]; P=0.001). This reduction of death, MI and stroke was mainly noticed in patients with prior MI or stroke, but not with PAD or multiple risk factors. The reduction was seen with post PCI patients with prasugrel and only in those with prior MI with clopidogrel and ticagrelor. Long-term use of DAPT was associated with significant increase in major bleeding (1.47% vs. 0.88%; OR=1.65 [1.23-2.21]; P=0.001).Long-term use of DAPT for secondary prevention is associated with lower risk of death, MI and stroke beneficial especially in patients with prior MI and stroke, but it is associated with increased risk of bleeding. Prolonging DAPT requires careful assessment of the trade-off between ischemic and bleeding complications and should probably be reserved for patients with higher risk for atherothrombotic events.

SUBMITTER: Fanari Z

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5250594 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Jan - Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Long-term use of dual antiplatelet therapy for the secondary prevention of atherothrombotic events: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Fanari Zaher Z Malodiya Amratash A Weiss Sandra A SA Hammami Sumaya S Kolm Paul P Weintraub William S WS

Cardiovascular revascularization medicine : including molecular interventions 20160720 1

<h4>Background</h4>The potential benefit of long-term dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for secondary prevention of atherothrombotic events is unclear. Data from different randomized controlled trials (RCT) using different agents in different subgroups showed inconsistent results.<h4>Methods</h4>We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis from RCTs that tested different prolonged durations of DAPT for secondary prevention. Long term DAPT arm was defined as those receiving DAPT for more tha ...[more]

PMID: 27477306

Similar Datasets

Project description:Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) combining aspirin and a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor has been consistently shown to reduce recurrent major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for stable coronary artery disease (CAD) compared with aspirin monotherapy, but at the expense of an increased risk of major bleeding. Nevertheless, the optimal duration of DAPT for secondary prevention of CAD remains uncertain, owing to the conflicting results of several large randomised trials. Among patients with stable CAD undergoing PCI with drug-eluting stents (DES), shorter durations of DAPT (3-6 months) were shown non-inferior to 12 or 24 months duration with respect to MACE, but reduced the rates of major bleeding. Contrariwise, prolonged DAPT durations (18-48 months) reduced the incidence of myocardial infarction and stent thrombosis, but at a cost of an increased risk of major bleeding and all-cause mortality. Until more evidence becomes available, the choice of optimal DAPT regimen and duration for patients with CAD requires a tailored approach based on the patient clinical presentation, baseline risk profile and management strategy. Future studies are however needed to identify patients who may derive benefit from shortened or extended DAPT courses for secondary prevention of CAD based on their individual ischaemic and bleeding risk. Based on limited evidence, 12 months duration of DAPT is currently recommended in patients with ACS irrespective of their management strategy, but large ongoing randomised trials are currently assessing the efficacy and safety of a short-term DAPT strategy (3-6 months) for patients with ACS undergoing PCI with newer generation DES. Finally, several ongoing, large-scale, randomised trials are challenging the current concept of DAPT by investigating P2Y12 receptor inhibitors as single antiplatelet therapy and may potentially shift the paradigm of antiplatelet therapy after PCI in the near future. This article provides a contemporary state-of-the-art review of the current evidence on DAPT for secondary prevention of patients with CAD and its future perspectives.

Project description:To examine the comparative efficacy and safety of different antiplatelet regimens in patients with prior non-cardioembolic ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack.Systematic review and network meta-analysis.As on 31 March 2015, all randomised controlled trials that investigated the effects of antiplatelet agents in the long-term (≥ 3 months) secondary prevention of non-cardioembolic transient ischaemic attack or ischaemic stroke were searched and identified.The primary outcome measure of efficacy was serious vascular events (non-fatal stroke, non-fatal myocardial infarction and vascular death). The outcome measure of safety was any bleeding.A total of 36 randomised controlled trials (82,144 patients) were included. Network meta-analysis showed that cilostazol was significantly more effective than clopidogrel (OR 0.77, 95% credible interval 0.60-0.98) and low-dose (75-162 mg daily) aspirin (0.69, 0.55-0.86) in the prevention of serious vascular events. Aspirin (50 mg daily) plus dipyridamole (400 mg daily) and clopidogrel reduced the risk of serious vascular events compared with low-dose aspirin; however, the difference was not statistically significant. Furthermore, low-dose aspirin was as effective as higher daily doses. Cilostazol was associated with a significantly lower bleeding risk than most of the other regimens. Moreover, aspirin plus clopidogrel was associated with significantly more haemorrhagic events than other regimens. Direct comparisons showed similar results as the network meta-analysis.Cilostazol was significantly more effective than aspirin and clopidogrel alone in the long-term prevention of serious vascular events in patients with prior non-cardioembolic ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack. Cilostazol was associated with a significantly lower bleeding risk than low-dose aspirin (75-162 mg daily) and aspirin (50 mg daily) plus dipyridamole (400 mg daily). Low-dose aspirin was as effective as higher daily doses. However, further large, randomised, controlled, head-to-head trials are needed, especially in non-Asian ethnic groups.

Dataset Information

Long-term use of dual antiplatelet therapy for the secondary prevention of atherothrombotic events: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Publications

Long-term use of dual antiplatelet therapy for the secondary prevention of atherothrombotic events: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets