Dataset Information

Mathematical optimisation of the cisplatin plus etoposide combination for managing extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer patients.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) represents one of the most aggressive forms of lung cancer. Despite the fair sensitivity of SCLC to chemotherapy and radiotherapy, the current standard treatment regimens have modest survival rates and are associated with potential life-threatening adverse events. Therefore, research into new optimised regimens that increase drug efficacy while respecting toxicity constraints is of primary importance.

Methods

A PK/PD model for the combination of cisplatin and etoposide to treat extensive-stage SCLC patients was generated. The model takes into consideration both the efficacy of the drugs and their haematological toxicity. Using optimisation techniques, the model can be used to propose new regimens.

Results

Three new regimens with varying timing for combining cisplatin and etoposide have been generated that respect haematological toxicity constraints and achieve better or similar tumour regression. The proposed regimens are: (1) Protocol OP1: etoposide 80?mg?m^-2 over 1?h D1, followed by a long infusion 12?h later (over 3 days) of 160?mg?m^-2 plus cisplatin 80?mg?m^-2 over 1?h D1, D1-D1 21 days; (2) Protocol OP2: etoposide 80?mg?m^-2 over 1?h D1, followed by a long infusion 12?h later (over 4 days) of 300?mg?m^-2 plus cisplatin 100?mg?m^-2 over 1?h D1, D1-D1 21 days; and (3) Protocol OP3: etoposide 40?mg?m^-2 over 1?h, followed by a long infusion 6?h later (3 days) of 105?mg?m^-2 plus cisplatin 50?mg?m^-2 over 1?h, D1-D1 14 days.

Conclusions

Mathematical modelling can help optimise the design of new cisplatin plus etoposide regimens for managing extensive-stage SCLC patients.

SUBMITTER: Faivre C

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5294490 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Mathematical optimisation of the cisplatin plus etoposide combination for managing extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer patients.

Faivre C C El Cheikh R R Barbolosi D D Barlesi F F

British journal of cancer 20170112 3

<h4>Background</h4>Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) represents one of the most aggressive forms of lung cancer. Despite the fair sensitivity of SCLC to chemotherapy and radiotherapy, the current standard treatment regimens have modest survival rates and are associated with potential life-threatening adverse events. Therefore, research into new optimised regimens that increase drug efficacy while respecting toxicity constraints is of primary importance.<h4>Methods</h4>A PK/PD model for the combinati ...[more]

PMID: 28081545

Similar Datasets

Project description:PurposeVeliparib, a poly (ADP ribose) polymerase inhibitor, potentiated standard chemotherapy against small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) in preclinical studies. We evaluated the combination of veliparib with cisplatin and etoposide (CE; CE+V) doublet in untreated, extensive-stage SCLC (ES-SCLC).Materials and methodsPatients with ES-SCLC, stratified by sex and serum lactate dehydrogenase levels, were randomly assigned to receive four 3-week cycles of CE (75 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1 and 100 mg/m2 on days 1 through 3) along with veliparib (100 mg orally twice per day on days 1 through 7) or placebo (CE+P). The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Using an overall one-sided 0.10-level log-rank test, the study had 88% power to demonstrate a 37.5% reduction in the PFS hazard rate.ResultsA total of 128 eligible patients received treatment on protocol. The median age was 66 years, 52% of patients were men, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status was 0 for 29% of patients and 1 for 71%. The respective median PFS for the CE+V arm versus the CE+P arm was 6.1 versus 5.5 months (unstratified hazard ratio [HR], 0.75 [one-sided P = .06]; stratified HR, 0.63 [one-sided P = .01]), favoring CE+V. The median overall survival was 10.3 versus 8.9 months (stratified HR, 0.83; 80% CI, 0.64 to 1.07; one-sided P = .17) for the CE+V and CE+P arms, respectively. The overall response rate was 71.9% versus 65.6% (two-sided P = .57) for CE+V and CE+P, respectively. There was a significant treatment-by-strata interaction in PFS: Male patients with high lactate dehydrogenase levels derived significant benefit (PFS HR, 0.34; 80% CI, 0.22 to 0.51) but there was no evidence of benefit among patients in other strata (PFS HR, 0.81; 80% CI, 0.60 to 1.09). The following grade ≥ 3 hematology toxicities were more frequent in the CE+V arm than the CE+P arm: CD4 lymphopenia (8% v 0%; P = .06) and neutropenia (49% v 32%; P = .08), but treatment delivery was comparable.ConclusionThe addition of veliparib to frontline chemotherapy showed signal of efficacy in patients with ES-SCLC and the study met its prespecified end point.

Project description:BackgroundNo novel chemotherapeutic combinations have demonstrated superior efficacy to etoposide/cisplatin (EP), a standard treatment regimen for extensive-stage small cell lung carcinoma (ES-SCLC) over the past decade. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of belotecan/cisplatin (BP) and EP regimens in chemotherapy- and radiotherapy-naïve patients with previously untreated ES-SCLC.MethodsWe conducted a multi-center, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, phase III clinical study. A total of 157 patients were recruited at 14 centers with 147 patients meeting the inclusion/exclusion criteria and randomized to either BP (n = 71) or EP (n = 76) treatment arms. A non-inferior response rate (RR) in the BP arm, analyzed by intent-to-treat analysis according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.0 criteria, was used as the primary endpoint. The secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).ResultsIn the BP arm, one patient had a complete response, 41 had a partial response (PR), and 17 had stable disease (SD). In the EP arm, 35 patients had PR and 28 had SD. The RR in the BP arm was non-inferior to the EP regimen in patients with ES-SCLC (BP: 59.2 %, EP: 46.1 %, difference: 13.1 %, 90 % two-sided confidence interval: -0.3-26.5, meeting the predefined non-inferiority criterion of -15.0 %). No significant differences in OS or PFS were observed between the treatment arms. Hematologic toxicities, including grade 3/4 anemia and thrombocytopenia, were significantly more prevalent in the BP arm than the EP arm.ConclusionsThe RR to the BP regimen was non-inferior to the EP regimen in chemotherapy- and radiotherapy-naïve patients with previously untreated ES-SCLC. Hematologic toxicities were significantly more prevalent in the BP group, indicating that BP should be used with care, particularly in patients with a poor performance status. Further studies assessing PFS and OS are required to validate the superiority of the BP regimen.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00826644 . Date of Registration: January 21, 2009.

Dataset Information

Mathematical optimisation of the cisplatin plus etoposide combination for managing extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer patients.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Mathematical optimisation of the cisplatin plus etoposide combination for managing extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer patients.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets