Dataset Information

Hamstring Contracture After ACL Reconstruction Is Associated With an Increased Risk of Cyclops Syndrome.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Cyclops syndrome is characterized by loss of terminal knee extension due to proliferative fibrous nodule formation in the intercondylar notch. This complication occurs in the early postoperative period after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). The pathogenesis of Cyclops syndrome is not well understood.

Hypothesis

Persistent hamstring contracture after ACLR is associated with an increased risk of subsequent Cyclops syndrome.

Study design

Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods

The files of 45 patients who underwent arthroscopic debridement of a Cyclops lesion after ACLR were analyzed. Recorded data included demographic information and technical details of surgery. Preoperative magnetic resonance images were also analyzed, and patients with femoral bone bruising were identified. Passive and active range of motion were recorded in all patients preoperatively and at 3 and 6 weeks after surgery to address the Cyclops lesion. Passive extension deficit was evaluated in comparison with the contralateral limb and classified as secondary to hamstring contracture when contracture was observed and palpated in the prone position and when the extension deficit was reversed after exercises performed to fatigue the hamstrings. A control group was selected using a random numbers table among our entire ACLR cohort. Statistical analysis was performed to analyze differences between the 2 groups.

Results

There was no significant difference between the groups with regard to age at ACLR, sex distribution, time from injury to surgery (P > .05), proportion of professional athletes, presence of femoral bone bruise, or technical aspects of surgery. The overall extension deficit incidence was significantly higher in the Cyclops group at 3 weeks (Cyclops, 71%; control, 22%) (P < .001) and at 6 weeks (Cyclops, 60%; control, 7%) (P < .001). The extension deficit related to hamstring contracture was significantly higher in the Cyclops group at 3 weeks (Cyclops, 58%; control, 22%) (P < .001) and at 6 weeks (Cyclops, 29%; control, 2%) (P < .001).

Conclusion

The Cyclops lesion is associated with a persistent hamstring contracture at 3 and 6 weeks after ACLR.

SUBMITTER: Pinto FG

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5298440 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundRegeneration potential of Hamstring tendons after harvest assumes significant clinical relevance as its use has become widespread today. Methods which best assess the regeneration, extent and type of regeneration, plus issues related to functional loss are important for the surgeon to know. This review looks at the literature to find answers to the above questions.PurposeTo summarize the evidence in support of hamstring tendon regeneration, and the most appropriate modality for evaluation of regeneration. Additionally, to evaluate the regeneration in terms of complete or partial, extent and its impact on strength deficit and functional outcomes.MethodsWe did a systematic review of literature through specified search engines and identified 30 of 285 studies to be relevant (19 prospective and 11 retrospective).ResultsEvaluation of above data suggests tissue regeneration at harvest sites does occur (78.9% of semitendinosus and 42.7% of gracilis tendons), but this regeneration is variable. No established definition of regeneration exists; MRI is an adequate tool to identify regeneration, while biopsy is confirmative. USG is a cost-effective screening method and can document distal progress of regenerate. Semitendinosus and gracilis tendons regenerate at different rates and extents, and often fuse together, but there is no evidence to state that one regenerates better than the other. Proximal retraction of the muscle-tendon junction occurs, along with some atrophy, which affects function to a variable extent. Strength deficits may persist, but they may not convert to significant functional deficits.ConclusionThere is variable hamstring regeneration after harvest, with poorly defined definition of "regeneration". Some changes in the muscle itself, abnormal distal insertion and absence of regeneration in some are documented, along with strength deficits. Although overall functional deficits have been reported to be minimal, a definite change in the anatomy of the medial hamstrings is a factor to be kept in consideration. More information is needed about the long-term consequences.

Project description:PurposeTo establish the effect of the addition of suture tape to the hamstring graft construct through measurement of instrumented sagittal plane knee laxity at 6 months after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).MethodsA retrospective analysis was undertaken of a consecutive series of primary ACLR performed between May 2017 and June 2019. Patients with concomitant or historic contralateral knee injury were excluded. Suture tape was included in the graft construct from the midpoint of the study period (May 2018). Sagittal plane knee laxity was quantified using the KT2000 arthrometer at 6 postoperative months. Mean side-to-side differences in sagittal plane laxity between the operated and contralateral, uninjured knees were compared for grafts with and without suture tape. Additional outcomes included comparison between suture tape application techniques (graft reinforcement versus augmentation), comparison between suture tape with and without iliotibial band (ITB) tenodesis and documentation of complications necessitating further surgery.ResultsA total of 169 patients were eligible for inclusion. Seventy-two grafts included suture tape and 84 patients underwent concomitant ITB tenodesis. There was no significant difference in mean laxity between grafts containing suture tape (mean difference: 1.2 mm, SD: 2.6 mm) and those without (mean difference: 1.3 mm, SD: 2.1 mm), P = .83 (CI -.92 to 1.13). Neither were there significant differences in laxity when using suture tape with concomitant ITB tenodesis (mean difference: 1.1 mm, SD: 2.1 mm), P = .75 (CI -.79 to 1.09), or when comparing techniques: graft reinforcement (mean difference .9 mm, SD 2.6 mm); graft augmentation (mean difference: 1.5 mm, SD: 2.5 mm) P = .52 (CI -2.29 to 1.16). There were no complications associated with suture tape.ConclusionsThe addition of suture tape to an autologous hamstring graft construct did not reduce instrumented sagittal knee laxity in the first 6 months after ACL reconstruction. As such, the clinical relevance of its use remains unknown.Level of evidenceLevel III, retrospective cohort study.