Dataset Information

ACL Reconstruction Basics: Quadruple (4-Strand) Hamstring Autograft Harvest.

ABSTRACT: Hamstring tendon autograft remains a popular graft choice for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Although there are a variety of autograft and allograft options available for ACL reconstruction, advantages of hamstring tendon autografts include decreased postoperative knee pain and an overall easier surgical recovery compared with bone patellar tendon bone autograft. In addition, 4-stranded (quadruple) hamstring grafts are among the strongest grafts biomechanically (at time equals zero). Although the technique of hamstring autograft harvest is relatively straightforward, it is critical to pay attention to several technical steps to avoid iatrogenic neurovascular damage as well as to avoid premature amputation of the graft while using a tendon stripper. In this Technical Note, we describe a technique of hamstring autograft harvest for ACL reconstruction for a quadruple (4-strand) hamstring graft using the gracilis and semitendinosus tendons.

SUBMITTER: Frank RM

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5622412 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

ACL Reconstruction Basics: Quadruple (4-Strand) Hamstring Autograft Harvest.

Frank Rachel M RM Hamamoto Jason T JT Bernardoni Eamon E Cvetanovich Gregory G Bach Bernard R BR Verma Nikhil N NN Bush-Joseph Charles A CA

Arthroscopy techniques 20170814 4

Hamstring tendon autograft remains a popular graft choice for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Although there are a variety of autograft and allograft options available for ACL reconstruction, advantages of hamstring tendon autografts include decreased postoperative knee pain and an overall easier surgical recovery compared with bone patellar tendon bone autograft. In addition, 4-stranded (quadruple) hamstring grafts are among the strongest grafts biomechanically (at time equals ...[more]

PMID: 29354434

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundBone-patellar tendon-bone (bone-tendon-bone) and four-strand hamstring tendon grafts (hamstring) are the most commonly utilized autografts for primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Existing clinical trials, registry studies, and meta-analyses offer conflicting opinions regarding the most favorable graft choice.Questions/purposesWhich graft type for ACL reconstruction (bone-tendon-bone or hamstring) has a higher risk of (1) graft rupture and/or (2) graft laxity?MethodsWe performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), prospective cohort studies, and high-quality national registry studies to compare the outcomes of primary ACL reconstruction with bone-tendon-bone autograft or hamstring autograft. Studies that compared these graft types were identified through a comprehensive search of electronic databases (PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library). Two independent reviewers utilized the Jadad scale for RCT study quality and the Modified Coleman Methodology Score for prospective comparative and registry study quality. The included studies were analyzed for the primary outcome measure of graft rupture with or without revision ACL surgery. In surviving grafts, secondary outcomes of graft laxity were quantified by KT1000/2000™ testing, a positive pivot shift test, and a positive Lachman test. Meta-analysis was performed with Review Manager. A total of 47,613 ACL reconstructions (39,768 bone-tendon-bone and 7845 hamstring) from 14 RCTs, 10 prospective comparative studies, and one high-quality national registry study were included in this meta-analysis. Mean age was 28 years in both groups. Sixty-three percent of patients in the bone-tendon-bone cohort were men versus 57% of patients in the hamstring cohort. Mean followup was 68 ± 55 months.ResultsTwo hundred twelve of 7560 (2.80%) bone-tendon-bone grafts ruptured compared with 1123 of 39,510 (2.84%) in the hamstring group (odds ratio = 0.83, 95% confidence interval, 0.72-0.96; p = 0.01). The number needed to treat analysis found that 235 patients would need to be treated with a bone-tendon-bone graft over a hamstring tendon graft to prevent one graft rupture. Instrumented laxity analysis showed that 22% (318 of 1433) of patients in the bone-tendon-bone group had laxity compared with 18% (869 of 4783) in the hamstring tendon group (odds ratio = 0.86; p = 0.16). Pivot shift analysis showed a positive pivot shift in 19% (291 of 1508) of the bone-tendon-bone group compared with 17% (844 of 5062) in the hamstring group (odds ratio = 0.89; p = 0.51). Lachman testing showed a positive Lachman in 25% (71 of 280) of patients receiving bone-tendon-bone grafts compared with 25% (73 of 288) in the hamstring group (odds ratio = 0.96; p = 0.84).ConclusionsIn this meta-analysis of short- to mid-term followup after primary ACL reconstruction, hamstring autografts failed at a higher rate than bone-tendon-bone autografts. However, failure rates were low in each group, the difference observed was small, and we observed few differences between graft types in terms of laxity. Both graft types remain viable options for primary ACL reconstruction, and the difference in failure rate should be one part of a larger conversation with each individual patient about graft selection that should also include potential differences in donor site morbidity, complication rates, and patient-reported outcome measures. Continued prospective collection of patient data will be important going forward as we attempt to further characterize the potential differences in outcomes attributable to graft selection.Level of evidenceLevel III, therapeutic study.

Project description:BackgroundRegeneration potential of Hamstring tendons after harvest assumes significant clinical relevance as its use has become widespread today. Methods which best assess the regeneration, extent and type of regeneration, plus issues related to functional loss are important for the surgeon to know. This review looks at the literature to find answers to the above questions.PurposeTo summarize the evidence in support of hamstring tendon regeneration, and the most appropriate modality for evaluation of regeneration. Additionally, to evaluate the regeneration in terms of complete or partial, extent and its impact on strength deficit and functional outcomes.MethodsWe did a systematic review of literature through specified search engines and identified 30 of 285 studies to be relevant (19 prospective and 11 retrospective).ResultsEvaluation of above data suggests tissue regeneration at harvest sites does occur (78.9% of semitendinosus and 42.7% of gracilis tendons), but this regeneration is variable. No established definition of regeneration exists; MRI is an adequate tool to identify regeneration, while biopsy is confirmative. USG is a cost-effective screening method and can document distal progress of regenerate. Semitendinosus and gracilis tendons regenerate at different rates and extents, and often fuse together, but there is no evidence to state that one regenerates better than the other. Proximal retraction of the muscle-tendon junction occurs, along with some atrophy, which affects function to a variable extent. Strength deficits may persist, but they may not convert to significant functional deficits.ConclusionThere is variable hamstring regeneration after harvest, with poorly defined definition of "regeneration". Some changes in the muscle itself, abnormal distal insertion and absence of regeneration in some are documented, along with strength deficits. Although overall functional deficits have been reported to be minimal, a definite change in the anatomy of the medial hamstrings is a factor to be kept in consideration. More information is needed about the long-term consequences.

Project description:The popliteus tendon plays a critical role in restraining the tibia against external rotation. It is often injured in the setting of posterolateral corner injuries. However, it is rarely injured in isolation from other structures of the posterolateral corner. This Technical Note describes an open anatomic reconstruction of the popliteus tendon. Although several techniques exist, this technique has been biomechanically validated and shown to have good outcomes. An early rehabilitation protocol focused on protected range of motion, edema control, quadriceps strengthening, and pain control is essential for maximizing patient outcomes. Technique Video Video 1 A standard lateral hockey-stick incision is made over the inferior border of the iliotibial band and carried distally bisecting Gerdy’s tubercle and the anterior border of the fibular head. A 6-cm long CPN neurolysis is performed with extreme care to minimize the risk of footdrop postoperatively due to swelling. Attention is then turned to the tibia for creation of the tibial tunnel. A Chandler retractor is then placed in the developed interval along the posterior tibia to protect the neurovascular structures, and an ACUFEX guide is used to drill a guide wire from anterior to posterior. The surgeon then splits the iliotibial band and enters the lateral capsule to identify the injured popliteus tendon. A pin is placed through the center of the femoral attachment of the popliteus, and the guide pin is angled to exit the thigh anteromedially. This is then over-reamed using a 6-mm reamer and is followed with a 7-mm tap. The semitendinosus tendon is then obtained using an open hamstring harvester tool. The graft is prepared by an assistant on the back table by whipstitching each end with #2 nonabsorbable sutures The popliteus tendon graft is then shuttled into the femoral tunnel and held in place with a 7 × 20-mm bioabsorbable screw. The graft is then fixed within the tibia using a 7 × 20-mm bioabsorbable screw with the knee at 60° of flexion and the foot in neutral rotation and traction on the graft The dial test and posterolateral corner test now return to normal. (CPN, common peroneal nerve.)

Dataset Information

ACL Reconstruction Basics: Quadruple (4-Strand) Hamstring Autograft Harvest.

Publications

ACL Reconstruction Basics: Quadruple (4-Strand) Hamstring Autograft Harvest.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets