Dataset Information

Electronic retinal implant surgery.

ABSTRACT: Blindness due to outer retinal degeneration still remains largely untreatable. Photoreceptor loss removes light sensitivity, but the remaining inner retinal layers, the optic nerve, and indeed the physical structure of the eye itself may be unaffected by the degenerative processes. This provides the opportunity to restore some degree of vision with an electronic device in the subretinal space. In this lecture I will provide an overview of our experiences with the first-generation retinal implant Alpha IMS, developed by Retina Implant AG and based on the technology developed by Eberhart Zrenner as part of a multicentre clinical trial (NCT01024803). We are currently in the process of running a second NIHR-funded clinical trial to assess the next-generation device. The positive results from both studies to date indicate that the retinal implant should be included as a potential treatment for patients who are completely blind from retinitis pigmentosa. Evolution of the technology in future may provide further opportunities for earlier intervention or for other diseases.

SUBMITTER: MacLaren RE

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5306465 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Electronic retinal implant surgery.

MacLaren R E RE

Eye (London, England) 20170106 2

Blindness due to outer retinal degeneration still remains largely untreatable. Photoreceptor loss removes light sensitivity, but the remaining inner retinal layers, the optic nerve, and indeed the physical structure of the eye itself may be unaffected by the degenerative processes. This provides the opportunity to restore some degree of vision with an electronic device in the subretinal space. In this lecture I will provide an overview of our experiences with the first-generation retinal implant ...[more]

PMID: 28060358

Similar Datasets

Project description:ImportanceThe postoperative retinal changes at the interface between an implant electrode array and the retina and whether these anatomic changes have an association with the patient visual performance are unknown.ObjectiveTo report morphologic changes in recipients of an Argus II Retinal Prosthesis.Design, setting, and participantsThis consecutive, noncomparative case series study included a retrospective review of the preoperative and postoperative optical coherence tomography of 33 eyes among 33 individuals who underwent Argus II Retinal Prosthesis System implantation between October 28, 2011, and June 8, 2017, at 2 different centers, by the same surgeon (S.R.). Thirteen patients received an implant at Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy, between October 28, 2011, and October 27, 2014, and 20 patients underwent surgery at Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy, between December 20, 2014, and June 8, 2017. Patients were excluded if they did not reach the 6-month follow-up.Main outcomes and measuresAll patients were evaluated before surgery, during the first postoperative day, and at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months (subsequently once a year, except for patient-related adverse events), with a comprehensive ophthalmic examination, retinal fundus photography, spectral-domain optical coherence tomography, and visual function tests to evaluate the stability or improvement of their visual performance.ResultsOf the 20 patients included in the analysis, all were of white race/ethnicity, 12 (60%) were male, and the mean (SD) age was 57.4 (11.6) years. Optical coherence tomography revealed the development of a fibrosislike hyperreflective tissue limited at the interface between the array and retina in 10 eyes (50%). In 9 of 10 patients (90%), fibrosis evolved and progressed to retinal schisis. Despite the development of the fibrosis and schisis, there was no deterioration in the patient's visual performance evaluated prospectively with visual function tests (square localization and direction of motion).Conclusions and relevanceOptical coherence tomography may be used to observe the retinal anatomic changes in patients with an Argus II Prothesis. This analysis revealed the development of a fibrosislike hyperreflective tissue limited at the interface between array and retina that progressed to retinal schisis but with no deterioration in the patients' visual performance.

Project description:PURPOSE:To report the initial efficacy results of the Retina Implant Alpha AMS (Retina Implant AG, Reutlingen, Germany) for partial restoration of vision in end-stage retinitis pigmentosa (RP). DESIGN:Prospective, single-arm, investigator-sponsored interventional clinical trial. Within-participant control comprising residual vision with the retinal implant switched ON versus OFF in the implanted eye. PARTICIPANTS:The Retina Implant Alpha AMS was implanted into the worse-seeing eye of 6 participants with end-stage RP and no useful perception of light vision. Eligibility criteria included previous normal vision for ?12 years and no significant ocular or systemic comorbidity. METHODS:Vision assessments were scheduled at 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months postimplantation. They comprised tabletop object recognition tasks, a self-assessment mobility questionnaire, and screen-based tests including Basic Light and Motion (BaLM), grating acuity, and greyscale contrast discrimination. A full-field stimulus test (FST) was also performed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:Improvement in activities of daily living, recognition tasks, and assessments of light perception with the implant ON compared with OFF. RESULTS:All 6 participants underwent successful implantation. Light perception and temporal resolution with the implant ON were achieved in all participants. Light localization was achieved with the implant ON in all but 1 participant (P4) in whom the chip was not functioning optimally because of a combination of iatrogenic intraoperative implant damage and incorrect implantation. Implant ON correct grating detections (which were at chance level with implant OFF) were recorded in the other 5 participants, ranging from 0.1 to 3.33 cycles/degree on 1 occasion. The ability to locate high-contrast tabletop objects not seen with the implant OFF was partially restored with the implant ON in all but 1 participant (P4). There were 2 incidents of conjunctival erosion and 1 inferotemporal macula-on retinal detachment, which were successfully repaired, and 2 incidents of inadvertent damage to the implant during surgery (P3 and P4). CONCLUSIONS:The Alpha AMS subretinal implant improved visual performance in 5 of 6 participants and has exhibited ongoing function for up to 24 months. Although implantation surgery remains challenging, new developments such as OCT microscope guidance added refinements to the surgical technique.

Project description:Purpose: We assessed the safety and efficacy of a technically advanced subretinal electronic implant, RETINA IMPLANT Alpha AMS, in end stage retinal degeneration in an interim analysis of two ongoing prospective clinical trials. The purpose of this article is to describe the interim functional results (efficacy). Methods: The subretinal visual prosthesis RETINA IMPLANT Alpha AMS (Retina Implant AG, Reutlingen, Germany) was implanted in 15 blind patients with hereditary retinal degenerations at four study sites with a follow-up period of 12 months (www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT01024803 and NCT02720640). Functional outcome measures included (1) screen-based standardized 2- or 4-alternative forced-choice (AFC) tests of light perception, light localization, grating detection (basic grating acuity (BaGA) test), and Landolt C-rings; (2) gray level discrimination; (3) performance during activities of daily living (ADL-table tasks). Results: Implant-mediated light perception was observed in 13/15 patients. During the observation period implant mediated localization of visual targets was possible in 13/15 patients. Correct grating detection was achieved for spatial frequencies of 0.1 cpd (cycles per degree) in 4/15; 0.33 cpd in 3/15; 0.66 cpd in 2/15; 1.0 cpd in 2/15 and 3.3 cpd in 1/15 patients. In two patients visual acuity (VA) assessed with Landolt C- rings was 20/546 and 20/1111. Of 6 possible gray levels on average 4.6 ± 0.8 (mean ± SD, n = 10) were discerned. Improvements (power ON vs. OFF) of ADL table tasks were measured in 13/15 patients. Overall, results were stable during the observation period. Serious adverse events (SAEs) were reported in 4 patients: 2 movements of the implant, readjusted in a second surgery; 4 conjunctival erosion/dehiscence, successfully treated; 1 pain event around the coil, successfully treated; 1 partial reduction of silicone oil tamponade leading to distorted vision (silicon oil successfully refilled). The majority of adverse events (AEs) were transient and mostly of mild to moderate intensity. Conclusions: Psychophysical and subjective data show that RETINA IMPLANT Alpha AMS is reliable, well tolerated and can restore limited visual functions in blind patients with degenerations of the outer retina. Compared with the previous implant Alpha IMS, longevity of the new implant Alpha AMS has been considerably improved. Alpha AMS has meanwhile been certified as a commercially available medical device, reimbursed in Germany by the public health system.

Dataset Information

Electronic retinal implant surgery.

Publications

Electronic retinal implant surgery.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets