Dataset Information

Reproducibility of high-definition (3D) manometry and its agreement with high-resolution (2D) manometry in women with fecal incontinence.

ABSTRACT: While widely used in clinical practice, the reproducibility of high-definition anorectal manometry (HD-ARM) remains unclear. We evaluated the intra-individual reproducibility of HD-ARM and compared pressures measured with HD-ARM and high-resolution anorectal manometry (HR-ARM).Thirty-six women with fecal incontinence had an initial HD-ARM (HD-ARM1); on the same day, after randomization, 21 had a second (HD-ARM2). Sixteen women had a third (HD-ARM3) 4 weeks later. Twenty-five had also been evaluated by HR-ARM previously. Rectoanal pressures were assessed at rest, during squeeze and simulated evacuation. Concordance among pressures was assessed with Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (CCC).Anal resting and squeeze pressures measured with HD-ARM were reproducible on the same and different days; for average resting pressures of HD-ARM1 vs HD-ARM2, CCC = 0.73 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.53-0.94), and for HD-ARM1 vs HD-ARM3, CCC = 0.60 (95% CI: 0.28-0.93). For maximum squeeze pressures of HD-ARM1 vs HD-ARM2, CCC = 0.86 (95% CI: 0.75-0.97), and for HD-ARM1 vs HD-ARM3, CCC = 0.56 (95% CI: 0.21-0.91). The rectoanal gradient during evacuation was significantly concordant between HD-ARM1 and HD-ARM2 but not HD-ARM1 and HD-ARM3. Resting (CCC = 0.38 [95% CI: 0.14-0.62]) and squeeze pressures (CCC = 0.73 [95% CI: 0.57-0.89]) measured with HD-ARM1 and HR-ARM were also concordant.Among women with fecal incontinence, measurements with HD-ARM were reproducible on the same (anal resting and squeeze pressures and rectoanal gradient during evacuation) and different days (anal resting and squeeze pressures) and correlated with HR-ARM measurements. These findings support use of HD-ARM and HR-ARM for longitudinal assessments of anal resting and squeeze pressures.

SUBMITTER: Chakraborty S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5329128 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Reproducibility of high-definition (3D) manometry and its agreement with high-resolution (2D) manometry in women with fecal incontinence.

Chakraborty S S Feuerhak K J KJ Zinsmeister A R AR Bharucha A E AE

Neurogastroenterology and motility 20161002 3

<h4>Background</h4>While widely used in clinical practice, the reproducibility of high-definition anorectal manometry (HD-ARM) remains unclear. We evaluated the intra-individual reproducibility of HD-ARM and compared pressures measured with HD-ARM and high-resolution anorectal manometry (HR-ARM).<h4>Methods</h4>Thirty-six women with fecal incontinence had an initial HD-ARM (HD-ARM1); on the same day, after randomization, 21 had a second (HD-ARM2). Sixteen women had a third (HD-ARM3) 4 weeks late ...[more]

PMID: 27696628

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background & aimsThree-dimensional high-definition anorectal manometry (3D-HDAM) is used to assess anal sphincter function; it determines profiles of regional pressure distribution along the length and circumference of the anal canal. There is no consensus, however, on the best way to analyze data from 3D-HDAM to distinguish healthy individuals from persons with sphincter dysfunction. We developed a computer analysis system to analyze 3D-HDAM data and to aid in the diagnosis and assessment of patients with fecal incontinence (FI).MethodsIn a prospective study, we performed 3D-HDAM analysis of 24 asymptomatic healthy subjects (control subjects; all women; mean age, 39 ± 10 years) and 24 patients with symptoms of FI (all women; mean age, 58 ± 13 years). Patients completed a standardized questionnaire (FI severity index) to score the severity of FI symptoms. We developed and evaluated a robust prediction model to distinguish patients with FI from control subjects using linear discriminant, quadratic discriminant, and logistic regression analyses. In addition to collecting pressure information from the HDAM data, we assessed regional features based on shape characteristics and the anal sphincter pressure symmetry index.ResultsThe combination of pressure values, anal sphincter area, and reflective symmetry values was identified in patients with FI versus control subjects with an area under the curve value of 1.0. In logistic regression analyses using different predictors, the model identified patients with FI with an area under the curve value of 0.96 (interquartile range, 0.22). In discriminant analysis, results were classified with a minimum error of 0.02, calculated using 10-fold cross-validation; different combinations of predictors produced median classification errors of 0.16 in linear discriminant analysis (interquartile range, 0.25) and 0.08 in quadratic discriminant analysis (interquartile range, 0.25).ConclusionsWe developed and validated a novel prediction model to analyze 3D-HDAM data. This system can accurately distinguish patients with FI from control subjects.

Project description:Background & aimsHigh-definition anorectal manometry (HDAM-3D) provides a topographic and 3-dimensional profile of anorectal pressure. We assessed anorectal sensorimotor function and the reproducibility of measurements made with HDAM-3D in healthy adults, and the accuracy of data analysis by its software.MethodsAnal sphincter pressures and rectal sensory thresholds were measured in 78 healthy subjects via placement of a 10-mm rigid probe, with 256 circumferentially arrayed pressure sensors, and a balloon in the rectum. The bearing down maneuver was assessed in a subset of 18 subjects. We compared data analyzed by an expert with findings from automated software analysis. Measurements made in a subset of 16 subjects, 2 weeks apart, were compared to determine reproducibility.ResultsResting, squeezing, and sustained squeezing pressures were significantly higher in men than in women (P < .05); other parameters were similar. Desire and urgency to defecate were similar between men and women, but the maximal tolerable volume was significantly lower in women (P < .05). Older women (>50 years) had significantly lower resting (P < .01) and sustained squeeze pressures (P < .04). Dyssynergic patterns of defecation were observed in 12 of 18 subjects (67%) who attempted to defecate without the 60-mL rectal balloon distention and in 6 of 18 subjects (33%) with the 60-mL rectal balloon distention. Test-retest values correlated (r = 0.81), as did analyses made by an expert vs software analyses of data (r = 0.99).ConclusionsOn the basis of HDAM-3D measurements in healthy adults, anal sphincter pressures are higher in men than in women, but sensory and other parameters are similar; older subjects have weaker sphincters. Many people were found to have dyssynergic patterns of defecation, which could be related to the probe or other technical issues, so this technique may not be suitable for assessing defecation patterns. Measurements made by HDAM-3D are reproducible, and data can be accurately analyzed by its software.

Dataset Information

Reproducibility of high-definition (3D) manometry and its agreement with high-resolution (2D) manometry in women with fecal incontinence.

Publications

Reproducibility of high-definition (3D) manometry and its agreement with high-resolution (2D) manometry in women with fecal incontinence.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets