Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Associations of P16INK4a promoter hypermethylation with squamous intra-epithelial lesion, cervical cancer and their clinicopathological features: a meta-analysis.


ABSTRACT: To assess the associations of P16INK4a methylation status with low-grade squamous intra-epithelial lesion (LSIL), high-grade squamous intra-epithelial lesion (HSIL), cervical cancer (CC) and their clinicopathological features, a meta-analysis with 29 eligible studies was conducted. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated to assess the strength of the associations. Heterogeneity, sensitivity of pooled results and publication bias were also evaluated. Overall, there was an increasing trend of P16INK4a hypermethylation rates among LSIL (21.4%), HSIL (30.9%) and CC (35.0%) specimens. P16INK4a hypermethylation was significantly associated with the increased risk of LSIL, HSIL and CC, with the pooled ORs of 3.26 (95% CI: 1.86-5.71), 5.80 (95% CI: 3.80-8.84) and 12.17 (95% CI: 5.86-25.27), respectively. A significant association was also found between P16INK4a hypermethylation and smoking habit (OR = 3.88, 95% CI: 2.13-7.08). Taken together, meta-analysis results support P16INK4a hypermethylation as an epigenetic marker for the progression of cervical carcinogenesis.

SUBMITTER: Han YD 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5352104 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Associations of P16INK4a promoter hypermethylation with squamous intra-epithelial lesion, cervical cancer and their clinicopathological features: a meta-analysis.

Han Ya-di YD   Wang Xue-Bin XB   Cui Ning-Hua NH   Zhang Shuai S   Wang Chen C   Zheng Fang F  

Oncotarget 20170101 1


To assess the associations of P16INK4a methylation status with low-grade squamous intra-epithelial lesion (LSIL), high-grade squamous intra-epithelial lesion (HSIL), cervical cancer (CC) and their clinicopathological features, a meta-analysis with 29 eligible studies was conducted. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated to assess the strength of the associations. Heterogeneity, sensitivity of pooled results and publication bias were also evaluated. Over  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC6772039 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6056635 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7411256 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4642558 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC2309648 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9940376 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3925171 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7519101 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC2694382 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4302669 | biostudies-literature