Dataset Information

A Century of Radiation Therapy and Adaptive Immunity.

ABSTRACT: The coming of age for immunotherapy (IT) as a genuine treatment option for cancer patients through the development of new and effective agents, in particular immune checkpoint inhibitors, has led to a huge renaissance of an old idea, namely to harness the power of the immune system to that of radiation therapy (RT). It is not an overstatement to say that the combination of RT with IT has provided a new conceptual platform that has re-energized the field of radiation oncology as a whole. One only has to look at the immense rise in sessions at professional conferences and in grant applications dealing with this topic to see its emergence as a force, while the number of published reviews on the topic is staggering. At the time of writing, over 97 clinical trials have been registered using checkpoint inhibitors with RT to treat almost 7,000 patients, driven in part by strong competition between pharmaceutical products eager to find their market niche. Yet, for the most part, this enthusiasm is based on relatively limited recent data, and on the clinical success of immune checkpoint inhibitors as single agents. A few preclinical studies on RT-IT combinations have added real value to our understanding of these complex interactions, but many assumptions remain. It seems therefore appropriate to go back in time and pull together what actually has been a long history of investigations into radiation and the immune system (Figure 1) in an effort to provide context for this interesting combination of cancer therapies.

SUBMITTER: Schaue D

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5387081 | biostudies-literature | 2017

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

A Century of Radiation Therapy and Adaptive Immunity.

Schaue Dörthe D

Frontiers in immunology 20170411

The coming of age for immunotherapy (IT) as a genuine treatment option for cancer patients through the development of new and effective agents, in particular immune checkpoint inhibitors, has led to a huge renaissance of an old idea, namely to harness the power of the immune system to that of radiation therapy (RT). It is not an overstatement to say that the combination of RT with IT has provided a new conceptual platform that has re-energized the field of radiation oncology as a whole. One only ...[more]

PMID: 28443099

Similar Datasets

Project description:PurposeAcute esophagitis (AE) is a common dose-limiting toxicity in radiation therapy of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC). We developed an early AE prediction model from weekly accumulated esophagus dose and its associated local volumetric change.Methods and materialsFifty-one patients with LA-NSCLC underwent treatment with intensity modulated radiation therapy to 60 Gy in 2-Gy fractions with concurrent chemotherapy and weekly cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Twenty-eight patients (55%) developed grade ≥2 AE (≥AE2) at a median of 4 weeks after the start of radiation therapy. For early ≥AE2 prediction, the esophagus on CBCT of the first 2 weeks was deformably registered to the planning computed tomography images, and weekly esophagus dose was accumulated. Week 1-to-week 2 (w1→w2) esophagus volume changes including maximum esophagus expansion (MEex%) and volumes with ≥x% local expansions (VEx%; x = 5, 10, 15) were calculated from the Jacobian map of deformation vector field gradients. Logistic regression model with 5-fold cross-validation was built using combinations of the accumulated mean esophagus doses (MED) and the esophagus change parameters with the lowest P value in univariate analysis. The model was validated on an additional 18 and 11 patients with weekly CBCT and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), respectively, and compared with models using only planned mean dose (MEDPlan). Performance was assessed using area under the curve (AUC) and Hosmer-Lemeshow test (PHL).ResultsUnivariately, w1→w2 VE10% (P = .004), VE5% (P = .01) and MEex% (P = .02) significantly predicted ≥AE2. A model combining MEDW2 and w1→w2 VE10% had the best performance (AUC = 0.80; PHL = 0.43), whereas the MEDPlan model had a lower accuracy (AUC = 0.67; PHL = 0.26). The combined model also showed high accuracy in the CBCT (AUC = 0.78) and MRI validations (AUC = 0.75).ConclusionsA CBCT-based, cross-validated, and internally validated model on MRI with a combination of accumulated esophagus dose and local volume change from the first 2 weeks of chemotherapy significantly improved AE prediction compared with conventional models using only the planned dose. This model could inform plan adaptation early to lower the risk of esophagitis.

Project description:BackgroundThe aim of the present study is to examine the impact of kV-CBCT-based online adaptive radiation therapy (ART) on dosimetric parameters in comparison to image-guided-radiotherapy (IGRT) in consecutive patients with tumors in the head and neck region from a prospective registry.MethodsThe study comprises all consecutive patients with tumors in the head and neck area who were treated with kV-CBCT-based online ART or IGRT-modus at the linear-accelerator ETHOS™. As a measure of effectiveness, the equivalent-uniform-dose was calculated for the CTV (EUDCTV) and organs-at-risk (EUDOAR) and normalized to the prescribed dose. As an important determinant for the need of ART the interfractional shifts of anatomic landmarks related to the tongue were analyzed and compared to the intrafractional shifts. The latter determine the performance of the adapted dose distribution on the verification CBCT2 postadaptation.ResultsAltogether 59 consecutive patients with tumors in the head-and-neck-area were treated from 01.12.2021 to 31.01.2023. Ten of all 59 patients (10/59; 16.9%) received at least one phase within a treatment course with ART. Of 46 fractions in the adaptive mode, irradiation was conducted in 65.2% of fractions with the adaptive-plan, the scheduled-plan in the remaining. The dispersion of the distributions of EUDCTV-values from the 46 dose fractions differed significantly between the scheduled and adaptive plans (Ansari-Bradley-Test, p = 0.0158). Thus, the 2.5th percentile of the EUDCTV-values by the adaptive plans amounted 97.1% (95% CI 96.6-99.5%) and by the scheduled plans 78.1% (95% CI 61.8-88.7%). While the EUDCTV for the accumulated dose distributions stayed above 95% at PTV-margins of ≥ 3 mm for all 8 analyzed treatment phases the scheduled plans did for margins ≥ 5 mm. The intrafractional anatomic shifts of all 8 measured anatomic landmarks were smaller than the interfractional with overall median values of 8.5 mm and 5.5 mm (p < 0.0001 for five and p < 0.05 for all parameters, pairwise comparisons, signed-rank-test). The EUDOAR-values for the larynx and the parotid gland were significantly lower for the adaptive compared with the scheduled plans (Wilcoxon-test, p < 0.001).ConclusionsThe mobile tongue and tongue base showed considerable interfractional variations. While PTV-margins of 5 mm were sufficient for IGRT, ART showed the potential of decreasing PTV-margins and spare dose to the organs-at-risk.

Project description:PurposeTo identify which patient-reported outcomes (PROs) may be most improved through adaptive radiation therapy (ART) with the goal of reducing toxicity incidence among head and neck cancer patients.MethodsOne hundred fifty-five head and neck cancer patients receiving radical VMAT (chemo)radiotherapy (66-70 Gy in 30-35 fractions) completed the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory, MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI), and Xerostomia Questionnaire while attending routine follow-up clinics between June-October 2019. Hierarchical clustering characterized symptom endorsement. Conventional statistical approaches indicated associations between dose and commonly reported symptoms. These associations, and the potential benefit of interfractional dose corrections, were further explored via logistic regression.ResultsRadiotherapy-related symptoms were commonly reported (dry mouth, difficulty swallowing/chewing). Clustering identified three patient subgroups reporting: none/mild symptoms for most items (60.6% of patients); moderate/severe symptoms affecting some aspects of general well-being (32.9%); and moderate/severe symptom reporting for most items (6.5%). Clusters of PRO items broadly consisted of acute toxicities, general well-being, and head and neck-specific symptoms (xerostomia, dysphagia). Dose-PRO relationships were strongest between delivered pharyngeal constrictor Dmean and patient-reported dysphagia, with MDADI composite scores (mean ± SD) of 25.7 ± 18.9 for patients with Dmean <50 Gy vs. 32.4 ± 17.1 with Dmean ≥50 Gy. Based on logistic regression models, during-treatment dose corrections back to planned values may confer ≥5% decrease in the absolute risk of self-reported physical dysphagia symptoms ≥1 year post-treatment in 1.2% of patients, with a ≥5% decrease in relative risk in 23.3% of patients.ConclusionsPatient-reported dysphagia symptoms are strongly associated with delivered dose to the pharyngeal constrictor. Dysphagia-focused ART may provide the greatest toxicity benefit to head and neck cancer patients, and represent a potential new direction for ART, given that the existing ART literature has focused almost exclusively on xerostomia reduction.

Dataset Information

A Century of Radiation Therapy and Adaptive Immunity.

Publications

A Century of Radiation Therapy and Adaptive Immunity.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets