Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors and the risk of heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.


ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:Given recent discrepant results from randomized controlled trials (RCTs), we examined the totality of RCT evidence assessing the association between dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors and heart failure. METHODS:MEDLINE, Embase and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched without language restrictions to August 2016 for RCTs comparing DPP-4 inhibitors to placebo or no therapy for a period of 24 weeks or more. We included all heart failure outcomes when listed either as a serious adverse event or adverse event. Pooled analyses used random-effects. RESULTS:We identified 100 RCTs (n = 79 867) - 3 large cardiovascular-safety RCTs (SAVOR-TIMI 53[saxagliptin]/n = 16?492, EXAMINE[alogliptin]/n = 5380, and TECOS[sitagliptin]/n = 14?735), and 97 smaller RCTs with a primary outcome that was usually change in glycated hemoglobin. Virtually all RCTs were high-quality, multicentre, placebo-controlled trials. A total of 96% (1192/1244) of heart failure events were prespecified, blindly adjudicated and required hospital admission. Pooled results suggested a 13% increase in heart failure (relative risk [RR] 1.13, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.26, I2 = 0%; 32 RCTs, n = 54?640, 1244 events). When including only the 3 large RCTs, the increase was similar, but not significant (RR 1.14, 95% CI 0.97-1.32; 3 RCTs, n = 36?543, 1169 adjudicated events; number needed to harm 246) owing to heterogeneity (I2 = 42%), which lead to wider CIs, because SAVOR-TIMI 53 showed increased heart failure (RR 1.26, 95% CI 1.06-1.49) and TECOS showed no effect (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.83-1.19). INTERPRETATION:Despite pooled data from 79 867 patients, whether DPP-4 inhibitors increase heart failure overall or exhibit within-class differences remains unresolved. Our results highlight the importance of ongoing trials that are comparing DPP-4 inhibitors to placebo, although no large cardiovascular-safety RCTs are comparing different DPP-4 inhibitors to each other; consequently, these will address the overall but not class-difference question.

SUBMITTER: Verma S 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5403656 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Jan-Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors and the risk of heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Verma Subodh S   Goldenberg Ronald M RM   Bhatt Deepak L DL   Farkouh Michael E ME   Quan Adrian A   Teoh Hwee H   Connelly Kim A KA   Leiter Lawrence A LA   Friedrich Jan O JO  

CMAJ open 20170101 1


<h4>Background</h4>Given recent discrepant results from randomized controlled trials (RCTs), we examined the totality of RCT evidence assessing the association between dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors and heart failure.<h4>Methods</h4>MEDLINE, Embase and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched without language restrictions to August 2016 for RCTs comparing DPP-4 inhibitors to placebo or no therapy for a period of 24 weeks or more. We included all heart failure outcomes when listed either as a  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC4395833 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC7755023 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8397556 | biostudies-literature