Dataset Information

Efficacy and safety of desmoteplase in acute ischemic stroke patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Pending results from double-blind, multicenter, parallel-group, randomized trials, the benefit and safety of the novel plasminogen activator, desmoteplase remain undetermined. The aim of this meta-analysis was to help evaluate desmoteplase's efficacy and safety.

Methods

A thorough search was performed of the Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Embase from the inception of electronic data to March 2017, and double-blind, multicenter, parallel-group, randomized trials were chosen. We conducted a meta-analysis of studies investigating intravenous desmoteplase treatment of acute ischemic stroke patients 3 to 9 hours after symptom onset. Asymptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage, good clinical outcome at 90 days, and reperfusion 4 to 8 hours posttreatment were variables assessing efficacy; symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage and death rates were measures of safety.

Results

Six trials involving 1071 patients thrombolyzed >3 hours postonset were included (600 received intravenous desmoteplase, 471 placebo). Desmoteplase was associated with increased reperfusion (odds ratio [OR] 1.57; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.10-2.24; P = .01 vs control) and showed a tendency to increase asymptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (OR 1.25; 95% CI, 0.97-1.62; P = .09 vs control), whereas there was no increase in symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage and death rate with desmoteplase. However, there was no difference in the clinical response at 90 days (OR 1.14; 95% CI, 0.88-1.49; P = .31 vs control). Subgroup analysis showed that desmoteplase 90 μg/kg (OR 1.53; 95% CI, 1.07-2.21; P = .02 vs control) and 125 μg/kg (OR 4.07; 95% CI, 1.16-14.24; P = .03 vs control) were associated with an increase in reperfusion. Also, we found desmoteplase 90 μg/kg showed a tendency to increase asymptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (OR 1.25; 95% CI, 0.95-1.63; P = .11 vs control).

Conclusion

Intravenous desmoteplase is associated with a favorable reperfusion efficacy and acceptable safety in ischemic stroke treatment >3 hours after symptom onset. Well-designed randomized controlled trials with larger patient cohorts and a moderate dose of drugs are needed to further evaluate the true efficacy of desmoteplase in stroke patients.

Trial registration

URL: http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO; PROSPERO registration number: CRD42016037667).

SUBMITTER: Li X

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5419907 | biostudies-literature | 2017 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Efficacy and safety of desmoteplase in acute ischemic stroke patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Li Xiaoqiang X Ling Li L Li Chuqiao C Ma Qiujie Q

Medicine 20170501 18

<h4>Background</h4>Pending results from double-blind, multicenter, parallel-group, randomized trials, the benefit and safety of the novel plasminogen activator, desmoteplase remain undetermined. The aim of this meta-analysis was to help evaluate desmoteplase's efficacy and safety.<h4>Methods</h4>A thorough search was performed of the Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Embase from the inception of electronic data to March 2017, and double-blind, multicenter, parallel-group, randomized trials were chos ...[more]

PMID: 28471961

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectiveArgatroban is a highly promising drug for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke (AIS), but there is currently insufficient strong evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of using Argatroban in the treatment of AIS. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Argatroban in the treatment of AIS.MethodsArticles on PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library databases were searched from these websites' inceptions to 2th February 2023. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies on Argatroban therapy for acute ischemic stroke were included. Meta-analyses were conducted using a random-effects model.ResultsFourteen studies involving 10,315 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The results showed a significant reduction in the rate of early neurological deterioration (END) in the Argatroban group compared with the control group (OR = 0.47, 95% CI: 0.31-0.73, I2 = 15.17%). The rates of adverse events were no significant difference between the two groups (ICH: OR = 1.02, 95% CI: 0.68-1.51, I2 = 0.00%; major extracranial bleeding: OR = 1.22, 95% CI: 1.01-1.48, I2 = 0.00%; mortality: OR = 1.16, 95% CI: 0.84-1.59, I2 = 0.00%). However, the rates of mRS score of 0-1 (OR = 1.38, 95% CI: 0.71-2.67, I2 = 77.56%) and mRS score of 0-2 (OR = 1.18, 95% CI: 0.98-1.42, I2 = 0.00%) during the 90 days did not significantly improved in the Argatroban group. Subgroup analyses showed that the rate of END (OR = 0.41, 95% CI: 0.26-0.65, I2 = 2.77%) and mRS score of 0-2 (OR = 1.38, 95% CI: 1.06-1.81, I2 = 0.00%) had significantly improved when the intervention group adopted Argatroban plus Antiplatelet.ConclusionArgatroban can improve neurological deterioration, with a low incidence of adverse events such as bleeding and death, and general analysis showed no improvement in mRS. However, subgroup analysis suggests that compared to mono-antiplatelet therapy, combination therapy of Argatroban combined with antiplatelet therapy significantly reduced the incidence of END and improved mRS scores. After using Argatroban, there was no increase in the risk and mortality of intracranial hemorrhage and other bleeding sites.

Project description:BackgroundEarly rehabilitation after acute ischemic stroke (AIS) contributes to functional recovery. However, the optimal time for starting rehabilitation remains a topic of ongoing investigation. This article aims to shed light on the safety and efficacy of very early rehabilitation (VER) initiated within 48 h of stroke onset.MethodsA systematic search in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases was conducted from inception to January 20, 2024. Relevant literature on VER in patients with AIS was reviewed and the data related to favorable and adverse clinical outcomes were collected for meta-analysis. Subgroup analysis was conducted at different time points, namely at discharge and at three and 12 months. Statistical analyses were performed with the help of the Meta Package in STATA Version 15.0.ResultsA total of 14 randomized controlled trial (RCT) studies and 3,039 participants were included in the analysis. VER demonstrated a significant association with mortality [risk ratio (RR) = 1.27, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.00, 1.61)], ability of daily living [weighted mean difference (WMD) = 6.90, 95% CI (0.22, 13.57)], and limb motor function [WMD = 5.02, 95% CI (1.63, 8.40)]. However, no significant difference was observed between the VER group and the control group in adverse events [RR = 0.89, 95% CI (0.79, 1.01)], severity of stroke [WMD = 0.52, 95% CI (-0.04, 1.08)], degree of disability [RR = 1.06, 95% CI (0.93, 1.20)], or recovery of walking [RR = 0.98, 95% CI (0.94, 1.03)] after stroke. Subgroup analysis revealed that VER reduced the risk of adverse events in the late stage (at three and 12 months) [RR = 0.86, 95% CI (0.74, 0.99)] and degree of disability at 12 months [RR = 1.28, 95% CI (1.03, 1.60)], and improved daily living ability at 3 months [WMD = 4.26, 95% CI (0.17, 8.35)], while increasing severity of stroke during hospitalization [WMD = 0.81, 95% CI (0.01, 1.61)].ConclusionVER improves activities of daily living (ADLs) and lowers the incidence of long-term complications in stroke survivors. However, premature or overly intense rehabilitation may increase mortality in patients with AIS during the acute phase. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42024508180.Systematic review registrationThis systematic review was registered with PROSPERO (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/). PROSPERO registration number: CRD42024508180.

Project description:BackgroundThe novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has rapidly spread worldwide and created a tremendous threat to global health. Growing evidence suggests that patients with COVID-19 have more severe acute ischemic stroke (AIS). However, the overall efficacy and safety of recanalization therapy for AIS patients infected by the SARS-CoV-2 virus is unknown.MethodsThe PRISMA guideline 2020 was followed. Two independent investigators systematically searched databases and ClinicalTrials.gov to identify relevant studies published up to 31 March 2022. AIS patients who received any recanalization treatments were categorized into those with COVID-19 and those without COVID-19. The main efficacy outcomes were patients' functional independence on discharge and successful recanalization, and the safety outcomes were in-hospital mortality and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. Subgroup analyses were implemented to assess the influence of admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale and different recanalization treatments on the outcomes. STATA software 12.0 was used for the statistical analysis.ResultsThis systematic review and meta-analysis identified 10 studies with 7,042 patients, including 596 COVID-19 positive patients and 6,446 COVID-19 negative patients. Of the total patients, 2,414 received intravenous thrombolysis while 4,628 underwent endovascular thrombectomy. COVID-19 positive patients had significantly lower rates of functional independence at discharge [odds ratio (OR) 0.30, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.15 to 0.59, P = 0.001], lower rates of successful recanalization (OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.68, P = 0.001), longer length of hospital stay (weighted mean difference 5.09, 95% CI 1.25 to 8.94, P = 0.009) and higher mortality rates (OR 3.38, 95% CI 2.43 to 4.70, P < 0.0001). Patients with COVID-19 had a higher risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage than the control group, although the difference did not reach statistical significance (OR 2.34, 95% CI 0.99 to 5.54, P = 0.053).ConclusionsCompared with COVID-19 negative AIS patients who received recanalization treatments, COVID-19 positive patients turned out to have poorer outcomes. Particular attention needs to be paid to the treatments for these COVID-19 patients to decrease mortality and morbidity. Long-term follow-up is necessary to evaluate the recanalization treatments for AIS patients with COVID-19.Systematic review registrationhttps://inplasy.com/inplasy-2022-4-0022/, identifier: INPLASY202240022.

Project description:Background: Xingnaojing injection (XNJ) is derived from a traditional Chinese prescription named Angong Niuhuang pill. As an adjuvant treatment widely used in acute ischemic stroke (AIS), XNJ has proven to be effective with certain clinical evidence. The aim of this study is to collect the latest evidence and evaluate efficacy and safety of XNJ for emergency treatment of AIS. Methods: We searched seven literature databases and two clinical trial registries from their inception to November 14, 2021 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining the efficacy of XNJ for AIS. Two reviewers independently selected relevant trials, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias. We pooled data into a meta-analysis using RevMan 5.4 software. Results: Thirty-eight RCTs were included in this review, with a total of 3,677 participants. XNJ plus conventional treatments (CTs) showed a significant advantage, compared with CTs alone, in improving functional independence at 14 days (RR = 1.70, 95% CI = 1.03 to 2.81, p = 0.04), neurological function (MD NIHSS < 6h = -3.81, 95% CI = -5.25 to -2.38, p < 0.00001; MD NIHSS < 24h = -3.75, 95% CI = -4.92 to -2.59, p < 0.00001; MD NIHSS < 72h = -3.74, 95% CI = -5.48 to -2.00, p < 0.0001; MD NIHSS < 14d = -1.97, 95% CI = -3.25 to -0.69, p = 0.003), and activities of daily living on the Barthel index (MD BI-14day = 9.97, 95% CI = 9.29 to 10.65, p < 0.00001; MD BI-30day = 10.04, 95% CI = 5.82, to 14.26, p < 0.00001). In addition, the results showed that XNJ plus CTs was superior to CTs alone in reducing IL-6, TNF-α, hs-CRP, and MMP-9. Regarding safety of XNJ, the incidence of adverse reactions in the XNJ group was lower than that in the control group (RR = 0.57, 95% CI = 0.38 to 0.87, p = 0.009). The certainty of evidence was evaluated as low or very low for all. Conclusion: XNJ appears to be effective and safe for emergency treatment of AIS. The first 72 h after the onset of stroke, in particular the first 6 hours, may be the optimum initiation time. However, further high-quality RCTs are warranted to determine an appropriate initiation time. Systematic Review Registration: [https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=233211], identifier [CRD42021233211].

Project description:BackgroundVinpocetine as a neuroprotective agent is effective in acute ischemic stroke in some randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Since the last systematic review has been published in 2008, which didn't find conclusive evidence favoring its use, two more RCTs have also been completed.MethodsRelevant electronic databases were searched with a suitable combination of Medical Subject Headings terms to detect publications describing RCTs exploring the safety and efficacy of vinpocetine in patients with acute ischemic stroke. The risk of bias was determined by using the Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing the risk of bias in RCTs after full-text review and relevant data extraction. Higgins and Thompson's I2 method was used to assess heterogeneity in studies. The presence of publication bias was assessed by Egger's test. We used a random effect model when I2 was more than 50% and a fixed-effect model for other parameters.ResultsFour placebo-controlled RCTs enrolling a total of 601 and 236 patients in vinpocetine and placebo groups, respectively, were included. The number of patients with death or significant disability was lower in the vinpocetine group than that in the placebo group at both 1 and 3 months (relative risk 0.80, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.65-0.99 and relative risk 0.67, CI 0.48-0.92, p = 0.04 and 0.02, respectively). The degree of disability in participants at 1 month and 3 months was also lower in vinpocetine group than that in the placebo group (standardized mean difference (SMD) 0.49, 95% CI 0.03-0.95 and SMD 1.22, CI 0.23-2.24, p = 0.001 and 0.04, respectively). Change in mini-mental state examination score compared with baseline at trial enrolment was also better in the vinpocetine group than in the placebo group (pooled weighted mean difference 0.92, 95% CI 0.02-1.82, p = 0.04).ConclusionsVinpocetine has some promising efficacy in patients with ischemic stroke when used in the acute stage in reducing the disability, but presently there is not enough evidence to suggest that it also reduces case fatality. More double-blind, placebo-controlled RCTs of adequate sample size are needed before making recommendations for the routine administration of vinpocetine for all patients with acute ischemic stroke.

Dataset Information

Efficacy and safety of desmoteplase in acute ischemic stroke patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Trial registration

Publications

Efficacy and safety of desmoteplase in acute ischemic stroke patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets