Dataset Information

Expected accuracy of proximal and distal temperature estimated by wireless sensors, in relation to their number and position on the skin.

ABSTRACT: A popular method to estimate proximal/distal temperature (TPROX and TDIST) consists in calculating a weighted average of nine wireless sensors placed on pre-defined skin locations. Specifically, TPROX is derived from five sensors placed on the infra-clavicular and mid-thigh area (left and right) and abdomen, and TDIST from four sensors located on the hands and feet. In clinical practice, the loss/removal of one or more sensors is a common occurrence, but limited information is available on how this affects the accuracy of temperature estimates. The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy of temperature estimates in relation to number/position of sensors removed. Thirteen healthy subjects wore all nine sensors for 24 hours and reference TPROX and TDIST time-courses were calculated using all sensors. Then, all possible combinations of reduced subsets of sensors were simulated and suitable weights for each sensor calculated. The accuracy of TPROX and TDIST estimates resulting from the reduced subsets of sensors, compared to reference values, was assessed by the mean squared error, the mean absolute error (MAE), the cross-validation error and the 25th and 75th percentiles of the reconstruction error. Tables of the accuracy and sensor weights for all possible combinations of sensors are provided. For instance, in relation to TPROX, a subset of three sensors placed in any combination of three non-homologous areas (abdominal, right or left infra-clavicular, right or left mid-thigh) produced an error of 0.13°C MAE, while the loss/removal of the abdominal sensor resulted in an error of 0.25°C MAE, with the greater impact on the quality of the reconstruction. This information may help researchers/clinicians: i) evaluate the expected goodness of their TPROX and TDIST estimates based on the number of available sensors; ii) select the most appropriate subset of sensors, depending on goals and operational constraints.

SUBMITTER: Longato E

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5493382 | biostudies-literature | 2017

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Expected accuracy of proximal and distal temperature estimated by wireless sensors, in relation to their number and position on the skin.

Longato Enrico E Garrido Maria M Saccardo Desy D Montesinos Guevara Camila C Mani Ali R AR Bolognesi Massimo M Amodio Piero P Facchinetti Andrea A Sparacino Giovanni G Montagnese Sara S

PloS one 20170630 6

A popular method to estimate proximal/distal temperature (TPROX and TDIST) consists in calculating a weighted average of nine wireless sensors placed on pre-defined skin locations. Specifically, TPROX is derived from five sensors placed on the infra-clavicular and mid-thigh area (left and right) and abdomen, and TDIST from four sensors located on the hands and feet. In clinical practice, the loss/removal of one or more sensors is a common occurrence, but limited information is available on how t ...[more]

PMID: 28666029

Similar Datasets

Project description:For numerically small breeds, obtaining a sufficiently large breed-specific reference population for genomic prediction is challenging or simply not possible, but may be overcome by adding individuals from another breed. To prioritize among available breeds, the effective number of chromosome segments (Me ) can be used as an indicator of relatedness between individuals from different breeds. The Me is also an important parameter in determining the accuracy of genomic prediction. The Me can be estimated both within a population and between two populations or breeds, as the reciprocal of the variance of genomic relationships. However, the threshold for number of individuals needed to accurately estimate within or between populations Me is currently unknown. It is also unknown if a discrepancy in number of genotyped individuals in two breeds affects the estimates of Me between populations. In this study, we conducted a simulation that mimics current domestic cattle populations in order to investigate how estimated Me is affected by number of genotyped individuals, single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) density and pedigree availability. Our results show that a small sample of 10 genotyped individuals may result in substantial over or underestimation of Me . While estimates of within population Me were hardly affected by SNP density, between population Me values were highly dependent on the number of available SNPs, with higher SNP densities being able to detect more independent chromosome segments. When subtracting pedigree from genomic relationships before computing Me , estimates of within population Me were three to four times higher than estimates with genotypes only; however, between Me estimates remained the same. For accurate estimation of within and between population Me , at least 50 individuals should be genotyped per population. Estimates of within Me were highly affected by whether pedigree was used or not. For within Me , even the smallest SNP density (~11k) resulted in accurate representation of family relationships in the population; however, for between Me , many more markers are needed to capture all independent segments.

Dataset Information

Expected accuracy of proximal and distal temperature estimated by wireless sensors, in relation to their number and position on the skin.

Publications

Expected accuracy of proximal and distal temperature estimated by wireless sensors, in relation to their number and position on the skin.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets