Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Failure of phylogeny inferred from multilocus sequence typing to represent bacterial phylogeny.


ABSTRACT: Although multilocus sequence typing (MLST) is highly discriminatory and useful for outbreak investigations and epidemiological surveillance, it has always been controversial whether clustering and phylogeny inferred from the MLST gene loci can represent the real phylogeny of bacterial strains. In this study, we compare the phylogenetic trees constructed using three approaches, (1) concatenated blocks of homologous sequence shared between the bacterial genomes, (2) genome single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) profile and (3) concatenated nucleotide sequences of gene loci in the corresponding MLST schemes, for 10 bacterial species with >30 complete genome sequences available. Major differences in strain clustering at more than one position were observed between the phylogeny inferred using genome/SNP data and MLST for all 10 bacterial species. Shimodaira-Hasegawa test revealed significant difference between the topologies of the genome and MLST trees for nine of the 10 bacterial species, and significant difference between the topologies of the SNP and MLST trees were present for all 10 bacterial species. Matching Clusters and R-F Clusters metrics showed that the distances between the genome/SNP and MLST trees were larger than those between the SNP and genome trees. Phylogeny inferred from MLST failed to represent genome phylogeny with the same bacterial species.

SUBMITTER: Tsang AKL 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5495804 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Failure of phylogeny inferred from multilocus sequence typing to represent bacterial phylogeny.

Tsang Alan K L AKL   Lee Hwei Huih HH   Yiu Siu-Ming SM   Lau Susanna K P SKP   Woo Patrick C Y PCY  

Scientific reports 20170703 1


Although multilocus sequence typing (MLST) is highly discriminatory and useful for outbreak investigations and epidemiological surveillance, it has always been controversial whether clustering and phylogeny inferred from the MLST gene loci can represent the real phylogeny of bacterial strains. In this study, we compare the phylogenetic trees constructed using three approaches, (1) concatenated blocks of homologous sequence shared between the bacterial genomes, (2) genome single-nucleotide polymo  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC6005169 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4026394 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC1694263 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4313233 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5120421 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC2725695 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6302598 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4982147 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC130786 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3504363 | biostudies-literature