Dataset Information

Distinguishing between Hepatic Inflammation and Fibrosis with MR Elastography.

ABSTRACT: Purpose To investigate the utility of magnetic resonance (MR) elastography-derived mechanical properties in the discrimination of hepatic inflammation and fibrosis in the early stages of chronic liver diseases. Materials and Methods All studies were approved by the institutional animal care and use committee. A total of 187 animals were studied, including 182 mice and five pigs. These animals represented five different liver diseases with a varying combination and extent of hepatic inflammation, fibrosis, congestion, and portal hypertension. Multifrequency three-dimensional MR elastography was performed, and shear stiffness, storage modulus, shear loss modulus, and damping ratio were calculated for all animals. Necroinflammation, fibrosis, and portal pressure were either histologically scored or biochemically and physically quantified in all animals. Two-sided Welch t tests were used to evaluate mean differences between disease and control groups. Spearman correlation analyses were used to evaluate the relationships between mechanical parameters and quantitative fibrosis extent (hydroxyproline concentration) and portal pressure. Results Liver stiffness and storage modulus increased with progressively developed fibrosis and portal hypertension (mean stiffness at 80 Hz and 48-week feeding, 0.51 kPa ± 0.12 in the steatohepatitis group vs 0.29 kPa ± 0.01 in the control group; P = .02). Damping ratio and shear loss modulus can be used to distinguish inflammation from fibrosis at early stages of disease, even before the development of histologically detectable necroinflammation and fibrosis (mean damping ratio at 80 Hz and 20-week feeding, 0.044 ± 0.012 in the steatohepatitis group vs 0.014 ± 0.008 in the control group; P < .001). Damping ratio and liver stiffness vary differently with respect to cause of portal hypertension (ie, congestion- or cirrhosis-induced hypertension). These differentiation abilities have frequency-dependent variations. Conclusion Liver stiffness and damping ratio measurements can extend hepatic MR elastography to potentially enable assessment of necroinflammatory, congestive, and fibrotic processes of chronic liver diseases. ^© RSNA, 2017 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

SUBMITTER: Yin M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5529282 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Purpose To evaluate the diagnostic performance and examination success rate of magnetic resonance (MR) elastography and vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) in the detection of hepatic fibrosis in patients with severe to morbid obesity. Materials and Methods This prospective and HIPAA-compliant study was approved by the institutional review board. A total of 111 patients (71 women, 40 men) participated. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients. Patients underwent MR elastography with two readers and VCTE with three observers to acquire liver stiffness measurements for liver fibrosis assessment. The results were compared with those from liver biopsy. Each pathology specimen was evaluated by two hepatopathologists according to the METAVIR scoring system or Brunt classification when appropriate. All imaging observers were blinded to the biopsy results, and all hepatopathologists were blinded to the imaging results. Examination success rate, interobserver agreement, and diagnostic accuracy for fibrosis detection were assessed. Results In this obese patient population (mean body mass index = 40.3 kg/m2; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 38.7 kg/m2, 41.8 kg/m2]), the examination success rate was 95.8% (92 of 96 patients) for MR elastography and 81.3% (78 of 96 patients) or 88.5% (85 of 96 patients) for VCTE. Interobserver agreement was higher with MR elastography than with biopsy (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.95 vs 0.89). In patients with successful MR elastography and VCTE examinations (excluding unreliable VCTE examinations), both MR elastography and VCTE had excellent diagnostic accuracy in the detection of clinically significant hepatic fibrosis (stage F2-F4) (mean area under the curve: 0.93 [95% CI: 0.85, 0.97] vs 0.91 [95% CI: 0.83, 0.96]; P = .551). Conclusion In this obese patient population, both MR elastography and VCTE had excellent diagnostic performance for assessing hepatic fibrosis; MR elastography was more technically reliable than VCTE and had a higher interobserver agreement than liver biopsy. © RSNA, 2016 Online supplemental material is available for this article. An earlier incorrect version of this article appeared online. This article was corrected on January 25, 2017.

Project description:ObjectivesTo determine the potential of bi-parametric dual-frequency hepatic MR elastography (MRE) for predicting portal pressure (PP) in mouse models of portal hypertension (PHTN) with the presence of varying hepatic fibrosis.MethodsWe studied 73 wild-type male mice, including 22 mice with hepatic congestion, 20 mice with cholestatic liver injury, and 31 age-matched sham mice. Hepatic shear stiffness (SS) and volumetric strain (VS) were calculated by 3D MRE acquired at 80 and 200 Hz. We measured PP immediately after MRE. Liver fibrosis was verified by hydroxyproline assay. We predicted PP by fitting generalized linear models with single- and dual-frequency SS and VS, respectively. The relationship between predicted and actual PP was evaluated by Spearman's correlation. We compared the prediction accuracy of portal hypertension for all models with DeLong tests at a significance level of 0.05.ResultsAnimals with congestive or cholestatic liver disease developed significant PHTN and hepatic fibrosis to varying degrees. In both models, SS increased, while VS decreased significantly compared with shams. All bi-parametric models had high diagnostic accuracy for PHTN. The dual-frequency models (AUCs: 0.90 [81-95%], 0.91 [81-95%]) had substantially or significantly higher accuracy than single-frequency ones (AUCs: 0.83 [71-91%], and 0.78 [66-87%]). The predicted PP of dual-frequency models also showed stronger correlations with actual PP than single-frequency predictions.ConclusionsThe bi-parametric dual-frequency model improved the diagnostic accuracy of liver MRE in diagnosing PHTN in preclinical models. This technical advance has the potential to monitor PHTN progression and treatment efficacy in the presence of varying fibrosis.Key points• Bi-parametric hepatic MR elastography can predict portal pressure. • The prediction models of shear stiffness and volumetric strain with dual-frequency measurements demonstrate high diagnostic accuracy (AUCs > 0.9) in two different portal hypertension mouse models with varying fibrosis.

Dataset Information

Distinguishing between Hepatic Inflammation and Fibrosis with MR Elastography.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets