Dataset Information

Differential Expression of Glycolysis-Related Proteins in Follicular Neoplasms versus Hurthle Cell Neoplasms: A Retrospective Analysis.

ABSTRACT:

Purpose

Although currently classified as variants of follicular neoplasms (FNs), Hürthle cell neoplasms (HCNs) exhibit distinct biological characteristics. Hence, the metabolism of both neoplasms may also be different. The aims of this study were to investigate and compare the expression of glycolysis-related proteins in HCNs and FNs and to determine the clinical implications of such expression.

Methods

Tissue microarrays were constructed with 265 samples of FNs (112 follicular carcinomas (FCs) and 153 follicular adenomas (FAs)) as well as 108 samples of HCNs (27 Hürthle cell carcinomas (HCCs) and 81 Hürthle cell adenomas (HCAs)). Immunohistochemical staining for the glycolysis-related molecules Glut-1, hexokinase II, CAIX, and MCT4 was performed.

Results

The expression levels of Glut-1, hexokinase II, CAIX, and MCT4 were significantly higher in HCNs than in FNs (p < 0.001). Glut-1, hexokinase II, CAIX, and MCT4 expression levels were highest in HCC, followed by HCA, FC, and FA (all p < 0.001). In HCC, hexokinase II positivity was associated with large tumor size (>4?cm) (p = 0.046), CAIX positivity with vascular invasion (p = 0.005), and MCT4 positivity with extrathyroidal extension (p = 0.030).

Conclusion

The expression levels of the glycolysis-related proteins Glut-1, hexokinase II, CAIX, and MCT4 were higher in HCNs than in FNs and in HCCs than in HCAs.

SUBMITTER: Kim HM

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5534281 | biostudies-literature | 2017

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Differential Expression of Glycolysis-Related Proteins in Follicular Neoplasms versus Hürthle Cell Neoplasms: A Retrospective Analysis.

Kim Hye Min HM Koo Ja Seung JS

Disease markers 20170716

<h4>Purpose</h4>Although currently classified as variants of follicular neoplasms (FNs), Hürthle cell neoplasms (HCNs) exhibit distinct biological characteristics. Hence, the metabolism of both neoplasms may also be different. The aims of this study were to investigate and compare the expression of glycolysis-related proteins in HCNs and FNs and to determine the clinical implications of such expression.<h4>Methods</h4>Tissue microarrays were constructed with 265 samples of FNs (112 follicular ca ...[more]

PMID: 28790533

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background: Follicular thyroid carcinoma (FTC) and Hurthle cell carcinoma (HCC) are rare and aggressive thyroid cancers with limited published data comparing their outcomes or regarding their subtypes. The aim of this study was to describe clinicopathological features and compare clinical outcomes of patients with FTC and HCC based on the 2017 World Health Organization definition and extent of vascular invasion (VI). Methods: We retrospectively studied 190 patients with HCC and FTC primarily treated with surgery at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center between 1986 and 2015. Patients were classified as minimally invasive (MI), encapsulated angioinvasive with focal VI (EA-FVI), encapsulated angioinvasive with extensive VI (EA-EVI), and as widely invasive (WI). To compare clinical outcomes, patients were grouped as follows: group 1 = FTC-MI and FTC EA-FVI, group 2 = FTC EA-EVI and FTC-WI, group 3 = HCC-MI and HCC EA-FVI, group 4 = HCC EA-EVI and HCC-WI. Outcomes of interest were overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS), and distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS). Outcomes were determined using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with log-rank test. Results: Patients with HCC (n = 111) were more likely to be older than 55 years old (59% vs. 27%, p < 0.001) with a tendency to present with more extensive VI (33% vs. 19%, p = 0.07) compared with FTC (n = 79). Comparing groups 1, 2, 3, and 4, group 4 patients were more likely to recur (DFS 98%, 93%, 98% vs. 73%, respectively, p = 0.0069). There was no statistically significant difference in OS, DSS LRRFS, or DRFS. Stratified by extent of VI (no, focal, and extensive VI), patients with extensive VI were more likely to recur (RFS 100%, 95%, 77%, p = 0.0025) and had poorer distant control (DRFS: 100%, 95%, 80%, p = 0.022), compared with patients absent or focal VI. Conclusions: Accurate assessment of the extent of VI and tumor phenotype (follicular vs. Hurthle) are essential in identifying patients at higher risk of recurrence.