Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Objective
No comprehensive national system tracking work-related diseases and injuries exists in the United States. Industry and occupation (I/O) are the missing data elements that would make existing healthcare data useful for occupational health. The authors previously petitioned the National Uniform Billing Committee (NUBC) to adopt I/O standards for states to consider during their healthcare data rulemaking processes.Methods
The NUBC asked for a pilot study to ascertain the potential burden. The time and cost to ask I/O questions in two hospital emergency departments was evaluated.Results
Asking four I/O questions required 48?seconds on average and cost between $520 and $623 per Registrar per year. The annual cost for the two hospitals to gather I/O on every patient was $4160 and $15,000.Conclusions
We conclude no undue burden compared with the estimated $250 billion cost of occupational illnesses and injuries.
SUBMITTER: Taylor JA
PROVIDER: S-EPMC5540352 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Aug
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Taylor Jennifer A JA Widman Shannon A SA James Samantha J SJ Green-McKenzie Judith J McGuire Cydney C Harris Erica J EJ
Journal of occupational and environmental medicine 20170801 8
<h4>Objective</h4>No comprehensive national system tracking work-related diseases and injuries exists in the United States. Industry and occupation (I/O) are the missing data elements that would make existing healthcare data useful for occupational health. The authors previously petitioned the National Uniform Billing Committee (NUBC) to adopt I/O standards for states to consider during their healthcare data rulemaking processes.<h4>Methods</h4>The NUBC asked for a pilot study to ascertain the p ...[more]