Dataset Information

Investigating the Association of Genetic Admixture and Donor/Recipient Genetic Disparity with Transplant Outcomes.

ABSTRACT: Disparities in survival after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation have been reported for some race and ethnic groups, despite comparable HLA matching. Individuals' ethnic and race groups, as reported through self-identification, can change over time because of multiple sociological factors. We studied the effect of 2 measures of genetic similarity in 1378 recipients who underwent myeloablative first allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation between 1995 and 2011 and their unrelated 10 of 10 HLA-A, -B, -C, -DRB1, and-DQB1- matched donors. The studied factors were as follows (1) donor and recipient genetic ancestral admixture and (2) pairwise donor/recipient genetic distance. Increased African genetic admixture for either transplant recipients or donors was associated with increased risk of overall mortality (hazard ratio [HR],?2.26; P?=?.005 and HR,?3.09; P?=?.0002, respectively) and transplant-related mortality (HR,?3.3; P?=?.0003 and HR,?3.86; P?=?.0001, respectively) and decreased disease-free survival (HR,?1.9; P?=?.02 and HR,?2.46; P?=?.002 respectively). The observed effect, albeit statistically significant, was relevant to a small subset of the studied population and was notably correlated with self-reported African-American race. We were not able to control for other nongenetic factors, such as access to health care or other socioeconomic factors; however, the results suggest the influence of a genetic driver. Our findings confirm what has been previously reported for African-American recipients and show similar results for donors. No significant association was found with donor/recipient genetic distance.

SUBMITTER: Madbouly A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5541944 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Investigating the Association of Genetic Admixture and Donor/Recipient Genetic Disparity with Transplant Outcomes.

Madbouly Abeer A Wang Tao T Haagenson Michael M Paunic Vanja V Vierra-Green Cynthia C Fleischhauer Katharina K Hsu Katharine C KC Verneris Michael R MR Majhail Navneet S NS Lee Stephanie J SJ Spellman Stephen R SR Maiers Martin M

Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation 20170302 6

Disparities in survival after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation have been reported for some race and ethnic groups, despite comparable HLA matching. Individuals' ethnic and race groups, as reported through self-identification, can change over time because of multiple sociological factors. We studied the effect of 2 measures of genetic similarity in 1378 recipients who underwent myeloablative first allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation between 1995 and 2011 and their unrelated ...[more]

PMID: 28263917

Similar Datasets

Project description:ImportanceThe proportion of living donor kidney transplants from donors unrelated to their recipients is increasing in the US.ObjectiveTo examine the association between donor-recipient biological relationship and allograft survival after living donor kidney transplant.Design, setting, and participantsThis retrospective cohort study used Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network data on US adult living donor kidney transplants (n = 86 154) performed from January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2014, excluding cases in which recipients previously received a kidney transplant (n = 10 342) or key data were missing (n = 2832). Last follow-up was March 20, 2020.ExposuresDonor-recipient biological relationship.Main outcomes and measuresThe primary outcome was death-censored allograft failure. Univariate and multivariable time-to-event analyses were performed for death-censored allograft failure for the overall cohort, then separately for recipients with and without primary diagnoses of cystic kidney disease and for transplants from African American and non-African American donors.ResultsAmong the 72 980 transplant donor and recipients included in the study (median donor age, 41 years; interquartile range [IQR], 32-50 years; 43 990 [60%] female; 50 014 [69%] White), 43 174 (59%) donors and recipients were biologically related and 29 806 (41%) were unrelated. Donors related to their recipients were younger (median [IQR] age, 39 [31-48] vs 44 [35-52] years) and less likely to be female (24 848 [58%] vs 19 142 [64%]) or White (26 933 [62%] vs 23 081 [77%]). Recipients related to their donors were younger (median [IQR] age, 48 [34-58] vs 50 [40-58] years), more likely to be female (18 035 [42%] vs 10 530 [35%]), and less likely to have cystic kidney disease (2530 [6%] vs 4600 [15%]). Related pairs had fewer HLA mismatches overall (median [IQR], 3 [2-3] vs 5 [4-5]). After adjustment for HLA mismatches, donor and recipient characteristics, and transplant era, donor-recipient biological relationship was associated with higher death-censored allograft failure (hazard ratio, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.01-1.10; P = .03). When stratified by primary disease, this association persisted only for recipients without cystic kidney disease. When stratified by donor race, this association persisted only for transplants from African American donors.Conclusions and relevanceIn this cohort study, living donor kidney transplants from donors biologically related to their recipients had higher rates of allograft failure than transplants from donors unrelated to their recipients after HLA matching was accounted for. Further study is needed to determine which genetic or socioenvironmental factors are associated with this finding.

Project description:ImportanceColorectal cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related death, and nearly 70% of patients with this cancer have unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLMs). Compared with chemotherapy, liver transplant has been reported to improve survival in patients with CRLMs, but in North America, liver allograft shortages make the use of deceased-donor allografts for this indication problematic.ObjectiveTo examine survival outcomes of living-donor liver transplant (LDLT) for unresectable, liver-confined CRLMs.Design, setting, and participantsThis prospective cohort study included patients at 3 North American liver transplant centers with established LDLT programs, 2 in the US and 1 in Canada. Patients with liver-confined, unresectable CRLMs who had demonstrated sustained disease control on oncologic therapy met the inclusion criteria for LDLT. Patients included in this study underwent an LDLT between July 2017 and October 2020 and were followed up until May 1, 2021.ExposuresLiving-donor liver transplant.Main outcomes and measuresPerioperative morbidity and mortality of treated patients and donors, assessed by univariate statistics, and 1.5-year Kaplan-Meier estimates of recurrence-free and overall survival for transplant recipients.ResultsOf 91 evaluated patients, 10 (11%) underwent LDLT (6 [60%] male; median age, 45 years [range, 35-58 years]). Among the 10 living donors, 7 (70%) were male, and the median age was 40.5 years (range, 27-50 years). Kaplan-Meier estimates for recurrence-free and overall survival at 1.5 years after LDLT were 62% and 100%, respectively. Perioperative morbidity for both donors and recipients was consistent with established standards (Clavien-Dindo complications among recipients: 3 [10%] had none, 3 [30%] had grade II, and 4 [40%] had grade III; donors: 5 [50%] had none, 4 [40%] had grade I, and 1 had grade III).Conclusions and relevanceThis study's findings of recurrence-free and overall survival rates suggest that select patients with unresectable, liver-confined CRLMs may benefit from total hepatectomy and LDLT.

Project description:BackgroundPrevious studies have shown that education level is associated with the prognosis of cadaveric kidney transplant recipients. However, it is unclear whether education affects the prognosis of living kidney transplant (LDKT) recipients. In addition, it remains to be determined whether the uneven distribution of educational levels consistently affects the prognosis of LDKT recipients across ethnic groups (White, Black, Hispanic and Asian).MethodsAfter establishing inclusion and exclusion criteria, we conducted a retrospective study of LDKT recipients who received their first single LDKT between 2005 and 2020. The LDKT recipients were divided into lower- and higher-education groups according to categorize the educational level of recipients, and transplant outcomes, including graft survival, patient survival, and death-censored graft survival (DCGS), were analyzed and compared.ResultsGraft survival, DCGS and patient mortality were significantly better in the higher-education group compared with those in the lower-education group (P<0.001), with the risk of graft failure, death censored graft failure (DCGF) and patient mortality increasing by 11%, 15% and 7% in the lower-education group, respectively. Furthermore, compared with the higher-education group, the risk of graft failure in Black recipients increased by 18% [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR), 1.18; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.07 to 1.30], and the risk of patient mortality among White recipients decreased by 7% (aHR, 0.93; 95% CI: 0.87 to 0.99). However, there were no significant differences in graft failure and patient mortality among Hispanic and Asian recipients, respectively.ConclusionsThis study revealed that LDKT recipients with a higher education level had better transplant outcomes. However, these transplant outcome differences were mainly found in White and Black recipients. These data confirm the significant effect of different levels of education on the prognosis of LDKT recipients.

Project description:Background:Nephron endowment in renal transplantation is infrequently considered, but may have important implications for post kidney transplantation outcomes. In this population-cohort study, we analyzed the deceased-donor kidney transplant outcomes stratified by donor-to-recipient size ratios. Methods:Data for all deceased-donor adult kidney transplantation recipients between 2003 and 2015 were extracted from the UK Transplant Registry. We used weight as a surrogate marker for kidney size and defined the following mismatch categories (donor weight/recipient weight × 100): less than 75% (small donor kidney), 75% to 125% (weight matched kidney), and greater than 125% (large donor kidney). Univariable and multivariable analyses were undertaken to assess the relationship between this marker and patient outcomes. Results:Outcomes for 11 720 transplants were analyzed with weight mismatch stratified as follows; small donor kidney (n = 1608, 13.7%), weight matched kidney (n = 7247, 61.8%) and large donor kidney (n = 2865, 24.4%). On multivariable analysis, no significant differences were detected in overall (P = 0.876) or death-censored (P = 0.173) graft survival, or in rates of delayed graft function (P = 0.396) between these 3 groups. However, 12-month creatinine levels were found to decline progressively across the groups (P < 0.001), with adjusted averages of 144.2 ?mol/L for recipients of small donor kidneys, 134.7 ?mol/L in weight matched kidneys, and 124.9 ?mol/L in recipients of large donor kidneys. In addition, patient survival was found to be significantly shorter in recipients of larger kidneys than those with weight matched kidneys (hazard ratio, 1.21; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-1.40; P = 0.009), which is inconsistent with the existing literature. Conclusions:Our data demonstrate that 12-month creatinine is influenced by donor-to-recipient difference in body weight, but that no such difference is observed for either delayed graft function or death-censored graft survival. However, we observed increased mortality in recipients receiving larger kidneys; an observation which conflicts with the existing literature and warrants further investigation.

Dataset Information

Investigating the Association of Genetic Admixture and Donor/Recipient Genetic Disparity with Transplant Outcomes.

Publications

Investigating the Association of Genetic Admixture and Donor/Recipient Genetic Disparity with Transplant Outcomes.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets