Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Strategic tradeoffs in competitor dynamics on adaptive networks.


ABSTRACT: Recent empirical work highlights the heterogeneity of social competitions such as political campaigns: proponents of some ideologies seek debate and conversation, others create echo chambers. While symmetric and static network structure is typically used as a substrate to study such competitor dynamics, network structure can instead be interpreted as a signature of the competitor strategies, yielding competition dynamics on adaptive networks. Here we demonstrate that tradeoffs between aggressiveness and defensiveness (i.e., targeting adversaries vs. targeting like-minded individuals) creates paradoxical behaviour such as non-transitive dynamics. And while there is an optimal strategy in a two competitor system, three competitor systems have no such solution; the introduction of extreme strategies can easily affect the outcome of a competition, even if the extreme strategies have no chance of winning. Not only are these results reminiscent of classic paradoxical results from evolutionary game theory, but the structure of social networks created by our model can be mapped to particular forms of payoff matrices. Consequently, social structure can act as a measurable metric for social games which in turn allows us to provide a game theoretical perspective on online political debates.

SUBMITTER: Hebert-Dufresne L 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5548779 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Strategic tradeoffs in competitor dynamics on adaptive networks.

Hébert-Dufresne Laurent L   Allard Antoine A   Noël Pierre-André PA   Young Jean-Gabriel JG   Libby Eric E  

Scientific reports 20170808 1


Recent empirical work highlights the heterogeneity of social competitions such as political campaigns: proponents of some ideologies seek debate and conversation, others create echo chambers. While symmetric and static network structure is typically used as a substrate to study such competitor dynamics, network structure can instead be interpreted as a signature of the competitor strategies, yielding competition dynamics on adaptive networks. Here we demonstrate that tradeoffs between aggressive  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC2924249 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3490980 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3926066 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6233882 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4828643 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3972268 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6191084 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3280989 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3426567 | biostudies-literature