Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Meaningful standard of reference for appendiceal perforation: pathology, surgery, or both?


ABSTRACT:

Purpose

This retrospective study was aimed to determine if appendiceal perforation identified pathologically but not surgically is clinically meaningful.

Methods

The study consists of 2 parts. First, we reviewed 74 studies addressing appendiceal perforation published in 2012 and 2013. Second, in a cross-sectional study, we classified 1,438 adolescents and adults (mean age, 29.3 ± 8.4 years; 785 men) with confirmed appendicitis as "nonperforation" (n = 1,083, group 1), "pathologically-identified perforation" (n = 55, group 2), "surgically-identified perforation" (n = 202, group 3), or "pathologically- and surgically-identified perforation" (n = 98, group 4). The 4 groups were compared for the frequency of laparoscopic appendectomy and the length of hospital stay using multivariable logistic regression analyses.

Results

The reference standard for appendiceal perforation was frequently missing or inconsistent in the previous studies. Laparoscopic appendectomies were less frequent in groups 3 (52.5%, P = 0.001) and 4 (65%, P = 0.040) than in group 1 (70.7%), while group 2 (73%, P = 0.125) did not significantly differ from group 1. Median hospital stays were 2.9, 3.0, 5.1, and 6.0 days for groups 1-4, respectively. Prolonged hospital stay (?3.7 days) was more frequent in groups 3 (77.7%, P < 0.001) and 4 (89%, P < 0.001) than in group 1 (23.4%), while group 2 (35%, P = 0.070) did not significantly differ from group 1.

Conclusion

We recommend using surgical rather than pathologic findings as the reference standard for the presence of appendiceal perforation in future investigations.

SUBMITTER: Kim HJ 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5566752 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Meaningful standard of reference for appendiceal perforation: pathology, surgery, or both?

Kim Hyuk Jung HJ   Kim Mi Sung MS   Park Ji Hoon JH   Ahn Soyeon S   Ko Yousun Y   Song Soon-Young SY   Woo Ji Young JY   Lee Kyoung Ho KH  

Annals of surgical treatment and research 20170728 2


<h4>Purpose</h4>This retrospective study was aimed to determine if appendiceal perforation identified pathologically but not surgically is clinically meaningful.<h4>Methods</h4>The study consists of 2 parts. First, we reviewed 74 studies addressing appendiceal perforation published in 2012 and 2013. Second, in a cross-sectional study, we classified 1,438 adolescents and adults (mean age, 29.3 ± 8.4 years; 785 men) with confirmed appendicitis as "nonperforation" (n = 1,083, group 1), "pathologica  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC7695924 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6236926 | biostudies-literature
2006-03-08 | GSE4389 | GEO
| S-EPMC8986685 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4837349 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7147286 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8496788 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC2367390 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC4823010 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7814070 | biostudies-literature