Unknown

Dataset Information

0

EUS Needle Identification Comparison and Evaluation study (with videos).


ABSTRACT: EUS-guided FNA or biopsy sampling is widely practiced. Optimal sonographic visualization of the needle is critical for image-guided interventions. Of the several commercially available needles, bench-top testing and direct comparison of these needles have not been done to reveal their inherent echogenicity. The aims are to provide bench-top data that can be used to guide clinical applications and to promote future device research and development.Descriptive bench-top testing and comparison of 8 commonly used EUS-FNA needles (all size 22 gauge): SonoTip Pro Control (Medi-Globe); Expect Slimline (Boston Scientific); EchoTip, EchoTip Ultra, EchoTip ProCore High Definition (Cook Medical); ClearView (Conmed); EZ Shot 2 (Olympus); and BNX (Beacon Endoscopic), and 2 new prototype needles, SonoCoat (Medi-Globe), coated by echogenic polymers made by Encapson. Blinded evaluation of standardized and unedited videos by 43 EUS endoscopists and 17 radiologists specialized in GI US examination who were unfamiliar with EUS needle devices.There was no significant difference in the ratings and rankings of these needles between endosonographers and radiologists. Overall, 1 prototype needle was rated as the best, ranking 10% to 40% higher than all other needles (P < .01). Among the commercially available needles, the EchoTip Ultra needle and the ClearView needle were top choices. The EZ Shot 2 needle was ranked statistically lower than other needles (30%-75% worse, P < .001).All FNA needles have their inherent and different echogenicities, and these differences are similarly recognized by EUS endoscopists and radiologists. Needles with polymeric coating from the entire shaft to the needle tip may offer better echogenicity.

SUBMITTER: Tang SJ 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5570521 | biostudies-literature | 2016 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

EUS Needle Identification Comparison and Evaluation study (with videos).

Tang Shou-Jiang SJ   Vilmann Andreas S AS   Saftoiu Adrian A   Wang Wanmei W   Streba Costin Teodor CT   Fink Peter P PP   Griswold Michael M   Wu Ruonan R   Dietrich Christoph F CF   Jenssen Christian C   Hocke Michael M   Kantowski Marcus M   Pohl Jürgen J   Fockens Paul P   Annema Jouke T JT   van der Heijden Erik H F M EH   Havre Roald Flesland RF   Pham Khanh Do-Cong KD   Kunda Rastislav R   Deprez Pierre H PH   Mariana Jinga J   Vazquez-Sequeiros Enrique E   Larghi Alberto A   Buscarini Elisabetta E   Fusaroli Pietro P   Lahav Maor M   Puri Rajesh R   Garg Pramod Kumar PK   Sharma Malay M   Maluf-Filho Fauze F   Sahai Anand A   Brugge William R WR   Lee Linda S LS   Aslanian Harry R HR   Wang Andrew Y AY   Shami Vanessa M VM   Markowitz Arnold A   Siddiqui Ali A AA   Mishra Girish G   Scheiman James M JM   Isenberg Gerard G   Siddiqui Uzma D UD   Shah Raj J RJ   Buxbaum James J   Watson Rabindra R RR   Willingham Field F FF   Bhutani Manoop S MS   Levy Michael J MJ   Harris Cynthia C   Wallace Michael B MB   Nolsøe Christian Pállson CP   Lorentzen Torben T   Bang Niels N   Sørensen Sten Mellerup SM   Gilja Odd Helge OH   D'Onofrio Mirko M   Piscaglia Fabio F   Gritzmann Norbert N   Radzina Maija M   Sparchez Zeno Adrian ZA   Sidhu Paul S PS   Freeman Simon S   McCowan Timothy C TC   de Araujo Cyrillo Rodrigues CR   Patel Akash A   Ali Mohammad Adel MA   Campbell Garth G   Chen Edward E   Vilmann Peter P  

Gastrointestinal endoscopy 20160210 3


<h4>Background and aims</h4>EUS-guided FNA or biopsy sampling is widely practiced. Optimal sonographic visualization of the needle is critical for image-guided interventions. Of the several commercially available needles, bench-top testing and direct comparison of these needles have not been done to reveal their inherent echogenicity. The aims are to provide bench-top data that can be used to guide clinical applications and to promote future device research and development.<h4>Methods</h4>Descri  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC8098837 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5803003 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6106144 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8466864 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10020000 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10927606 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7125392 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9921973 | biostudies-literature