Dataset Information

Evaluating rectal tumor staging with magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and endoluminal ultrasound: A meta-analysis.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), endoluminal ultrasound (EUS), and computed tomography (CT) are commonly used imaging tools to evaluate rectal tumor staging, but there was no recent meta-analysis to define the present role of the 3 tools. Here, we proposed to systematically compare the accuracy of the 3 imaging tools for rectal tumor staging.

Methods

We systematically searched diagnostic accuracy studies of MRI, CT, or EUS on rectal cancer staging, written in English or Chinese, published between January 1, 2003 and Dec 31, 2015 from database of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library. The reference standards should be pathological findings. Hierarchical regression model was used for producing summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves and calculating diagnostic accuracy data including sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio for the 3 imaging tools. Investigation of sample size, quality items and resolution, and magnetic field strength on heterogeneity was detected by using subgroup analysis and SROC regression.

Results

This analysis included 89 studies. MRI, CT, and EUS yielded similar diagnostic accuracy. Better performance was observed with high-resolution MRI and 3.0-T MRI (P?=?0.01 and 0.04, respectively). EUS showed lower diagnostic accuracy after preoperative therapies (P?=?0.03).

Conclusion

MRI, CT, and EUS have comparable accuracy for rectal tumor staging. High-resolution MRI and 3.0-T MRI can produce better staging results and were recommended. EUS is not suitable for rectal tumor staging for its significantly decreased accuracy.

SUBMITTER: Li XT

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5591164 | biostudies-literature | 2016 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Evaluating rectal tumor staging with magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and endoluminal ultrasound: A meta-analysis.

Li Xiao-Ting XT Zhang Xiao-Yan XY Sun Ying-Shi YS Tang Lei L Cao Kun K

Medicine 20161101 44

<h4>Background</h4>Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), endoluminal ultrasound (EUS), and computed tomography (CT) are commonly used imaging tools to evaluate rectal tumor staging, but there was no recent meta-analysis to define the present role of the 3 tools. Here, we proposed to systematically compare the accuracy of the 3 imaging tools for rectal tumor staging.<h4>Methods</h4>We systematically searched diagnostic accuracy studies of MRI, CT, or EUS on rectal cancer staging, written in English o ...[more]

PMID: 27858916

Similar Datasets

Project description:The aim of this study was to analyze the computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP), with a view to improving the diagnosis of this kind of tumor. A total of 27 cases of histopathologically confirmed DFSP were analyzed retrospectively. Of these, 18 patients underwent a CT scan and 9 patients underwent an MRI. All patients underwent unenhanced and contrast-enhanced examinations; 1 patient underwent multiphrase CT enhancement examination. Imaging characteristics, including location, shape, size, number, edge, and attenuation or intensity of each lesion, both unenhanced and contrast enhanced, were analyzed. Of the 27 cases, 24 were solitary, 2 had 2 nodules, and 1 had multiple confluent tumors. The lesion with multiple confluent tumors was ill defined and irregular; the other lesions were oval or round, well-defined nodules or masses. The unenhanced CT images showed 19 homogenous isodense lesions. There was no calcification in any of the patients. The contrast-enhanced CT images showed intermediate and marked nonhomogeneous enhancement in 13 lesions, intermediate homogeneous enhancement in 4 lesions, and a mild heterogeneous enhancement in 2 lesions. MR T1-weighted images revealed 1 ill-defined and 9 well-defined homogeneous isointense lesions. T2-weighted images showed homogeneous hyperintensity to the muscles in 6 lesions, 3 mild hyperintense lesions with hypointense lesions, and 1 mixed, mild hyperintense and isointense lesion. Contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images demonstrated intermediate and marked nonhomogeneous enhancement in 9 lesions and intermediate homogeneous enhancement in 1 lesion. DFSP is characterized by a subcutaneous well-defined soft tissue nodule or mass on plain CT/MR scans, and shows intermediate-to-marked enhancement on contrast-enhanced CT/MR scans. The imaging findings for DFSP are nonspecific, but may help to define the diagnosis in an appropriate clinical setting.

Project description:Detection of foreign bodies (FBs) is challenging. Selection of a fast and affordable imaging modality to locate the FB with minimal patient radiation dose is imperative.This study sought to compare four commonly used imaging modalities namely cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), and ultrasound (US) for detection of FBs in the head and neck region.In this in vitro study, iron, glass, stone, wood, asphalt, and tooth samples measuring 0.1 × 0.5 × 0.5 cm were placed in the tongue muscle, soft tissue-bone interface and nasal cavity in a fresh sheep's head and subjected to MRI, US, CT and CBCT. A total of 20 images were captured by each imaging system from the six materials in the afore-mentioned locations. The images were observed by an expert oral and maxillofacial radiologist and a general radiologist. To assess reliability, 20 images were randomly observed by the observers in two separate sessions. The images were classified into three groups of good visibility, bad visibility and invisible. The data were analyzed using SPSS version 18, Wilcoxon Signed Rank, Pearson chi square, and Fisher's exact tests.All FBs in the tongue and at the soft tissue-bone interface had good visibility on US (P = 1.00). Also, CBCT and CT had significantly different performance regarding FB detection (P < 0.001). All wooden samples in the nasal cavity were invisible on CT scans; while, only 20% of them were invisible on CBCT scans. MRI showed significant differences for detection of FBs in the three locations (P < 0.001). MRI could not locate iron samples due to severe artifacts and only showed their presence (bad visibility) but other FBs except for wood and tooth in the nasal cavity (100% invisible) had good visibility on MRI.Ultrasound is recommended as the first choice when FB is located within the superficial soft tissues with no bone around it. In case of penetration of FB into deeper tissues or beneath bone, CT or CBCT are recommended. Otherwise, considering lower dose, CBCT is preferred over CT. We can use MRI if the FB is not ferromagnetic. However, CT is the first choice in emergency situations because of higher sensitivity.

Dataset Information

Evaluating rectal tumor staging with magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and endoluminal ultrasound: A meta-analysis.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Evaluating rectal tumor staging with magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and endoluminal ultrasound: A meta-analysis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets