Dataset Information

Clinical Staging of Mass-Forming Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: Computed Tomography Versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

ABSTRACT: We compared the performance of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for preoperative clinical staging of mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA), using the eighth American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) system. This retrospective, multicenter, cohort study consecutively identified patients who underwent partial hepatectomy for mass-forming iCCA and had preoperative CT and MRI performed from January 2009 to December 2015. CT and MRI characteristics were used to determine clinical stage based on the eighth AJCC system. Performances of CT and MRI for clinical T and N staging were compared using generalized estimating equations. In 334 patients (median age, 63 years; 221 men), MRI sensitivities were significantly higher than CT sensitivities for detecting T1b or higher stages (91.0% vs. 80.5%, respectively, P < 0.001), T2 or higher stages (89.1% vs. 73.8%, respectively, P < 0.001), and T3 or T4 stage (77.8% vs. 58.0%, respectively, P < 0.001). MRI was also more sensitive at identifying multiple tumors than CT (66.7% vs. 50.0%, respectively, P = 0.026), without a significant difference in specificity (78.1% vs. 80.1%, respectively, P = 0.342). Sensitivities were comparable between CT and MRI for determination of size >5 cm (i.e., T1b for single tumor) and extrahepatic organ invasion (i.e., T4). Sensitivities of CT and MRI were not different for N stage (65.0% vs. 64.0%, respectively, P = 0.808), but the specificity of CT was significantly higher than that of MRI (80.7% vs. 72.9%, respectively, P = 0.001) when using a composite reference standard. Conclusion: MRI showed superior sensitivity to CT for diagnosing T2 and T3 stages, particularly multiple tumors. CT and MRI had comparable sensitivity for N staging, but CT provided higher specificity than MRI.

SUBMITTER: Kim YY

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8631089 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundAppropriate preoperative identification of iCCA subtype is essential for personalized management, so the aim of this study is to investigate the role of MR imaging features in preoperatively differentiating the iCCA subtype.MethodsNinety-three patients with mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA, 63 small duct type and 30 large duct type) were retrospectively enrolled according to the latest 5th WHO classification (mean age, males vs. females: 60.66 ± 10.53 vs. 61.88 ± 12.82, 50 men). Significant imaging features for differentiating large duct iCCA and small duct iCCA were identified using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses, and a regression-based predictive model was then generated. Furthermore, diagnostic performance parameters of single significant imaging features and the predictive model were obtained, and corresponding receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were subsequently presented.ResultsThe univariate analysis showed that tumor in vein, arterial phase hypoenhancement, intrahepatic duct dilatation, lack of targetoid restriction and lack of targetoid appearance in T2 were predictors of large duct type iCCA. Arterial phase hypoenhancement, intrahepatic duct dilatation and lack of targetoid restriction were independent predictors for large duct type iCCA in multivariate analysis. The regression-based predictive model has achieved the best preoperative prediction performance in iCCA subcategorization so far. The area under the ROC curve of the regression-based predictive model was up to 0.91 (95% CI: 0.85, 0.98), and it was significantly higher than every single significant imaging feature.ConclusionsArterial phase hypoenhancement, intrahepatic duct dilatation and lack of targetoid restriction could be considered reliable MR imaging indicators of large duct type iCCA. MR imaging features can facilitate noninvasive prediction of iCCA subtype with satisfactory predictive performance.

Project description:Structured reporting (SR) in radiology has been recognized recently by major scientific societies. This study aims to build structured computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR)-based reports in pancreatic adenocarcinoma during the staging phase in order to improve communication between the radiologist and members of multidisciplinary teams. A panel of expert radiologists, members of the Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology, was established. A modified Delphi process was used to develop the CT-SR and MRI-SR, assessing a level of agreement for all report sections. Cronbach's alpha (Cα) correlation coefficient was used to assess internal consistency for each section and to measure quality analysis according to the average inter-item correlation. The final CT-SR version was built by including n = 16 items in the "Patient Clinical Data" section, n = 11 items in the "Clinical Evaluation" section, n = 7 items in the "Imaging Protocol" section, and n = 18 items in the "Report" section. Overall, 52 items were included in the final version of the CT-SR. The final MRI-SR version was built by including n = 16 items in the "Patient Clinical Data" section, n = 11 items in the "Clinical Evaluation" section, n = 8 items in the "Imaging Protocol" section, and n = 14 items in the "Report" section. Overall, 49 items were included in the final version of the MRI-SR. In the first round for CT-SR, all sections received more than a good rating. The overall mean score of the experts was 4.85. The Cα correlation coefficient was 0.85. In the second round, the overall mean score of the experts was 4.87, and the Cα correlation coefficient was 0.94. In the first round, for MRI-SR, all sections received more than a good rating. The overall mean score of the experts was 4.73. The Cα correlation coefficient was 0.82. In the second round, the overall mean score of the experts was 4.91, and the Cα correlation coefficient was 0.93. The CT-SR and MRI-SR are based on a multi-round consensus-building Delphi exercise derived from the multidisciplinary agreement of expert radiologists in order to obtain more appropriate communication tools for referring physicians.

Project description:BackgroundThe precise differentiation of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) from atypical hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is vital for treatment strategy and prognostic prediction. In clinical practice, nearly 40% of HCCs demonstrate atypical manifestations, particularly HCCs with rim arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE), which is challenging to differentiate from mass-forming ICC. Thus, we aimed to develop a diagnostic regimen of gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA) contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) combined with serum tumor markers in differentiating mass-forming ICC from atypical HCC in at-risk patients with the hepatitis B virus (HBV).MethodsThis study enrolled 129 patients with pathologically proven mass-forming ICCs (n=53) and atypical HCCs (n=76) who had undergone preoperative Gd-EOB-DTPA contrast-enhanced MRI. The clinical data and imaging findings were analyzed. Univariate and multivariate logistic analyses were performed to identify the independent predictors for differentiating mass-forming ICCs from atypical HCCs. The diagnostic performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and DeLong test was used to compare the areas under curves of all independent predictors.ResultsUnivariate logistic regression analysis revealed normal alpha fetoprotein (AFP), elevated carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) level, elevated carcinoma embryonic antigen (CEA) level, central hyperintensity on T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), central hypointensity on T2WI, and targetoid sign on hepatobiliary phase (HBP) and targetoid restriction on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) were more likely to be significant predictors favoring mass-forming ICCs (all P values <0.05). In contrast, multifocal hyperintensity on T2WI and capsule sign were more frequently seen in patients with atypical HCC (all P values <0.05). Multivariate analysis revealed normal AFP, elevated CA19-9 level, targetoid sign on HBP, and targetoid restriction on DWI (all P=0.001) were independent predictors for differentiating mass-forming ICCs from atypical HCCs; DeLong test showed that the area under curve (AUC) increased to 0.949 when the above predictors were combined (all P values <0.05), and the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the combined independent predictors were 88.7%, 93.4%, and 91.5%, respectively.ConclusionsA diagnostic regimen integrating tumor markers (AFP, CA19-9) and imaging biomarkers (targetoid restriction on DWI and/or targetoid sign on HBP) using Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI could help to differentiate mass-forming ICCs from atypical HCCs and achieve high diagnostic performance of mass-forming ICCs in at-risk patients with the HBV.KeywordsMass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (mass-forming ICC); atypical hepatocellular carcinoma (atypical HCC); magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA); hepatobiliary phase (HBP).

Dataset Information

Clinical Staging of Mass-Forming Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: Computed Tomography Versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets