Dataset Information

Geographic Variation in Use of Ambulance Transport to the Emergency Department.

ABSTRACT: STUDY OBJECTIVE:Evidence on variability in emergency medical services use is limited. We obtain national evidence on geographic variation in the use of ambulance transport to the emergency department (ED) among Medicare enrollees and assess the role of health status, socioeconomic status, and provider availability. METHODS:We used 2010 Medicare claims data for a random sample of 999,999 enrollees aged 66 years and older, and identified ambulance transport and ED use. The main outcome measures were number of ambulance transports to the ED per 100 person-years (ambulance transport rate) and proportion (percentage) of ED visits by ambulance transport by hospital referral regions. RESULTS:The national ambulance transport rate was 22.2 and the overall proportion of ED visits by ambulance was 36.7%. Relative to hospital referral regions in the lowest rate quartile, those in the highest quartile had a 75% higher ambulance transport rate (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 1.75; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.69 to 1.81) and a 15.5% higher proportion of ED visits by ambulance (IRR 1.155; 95% CI 1.146 to 1.164). Adjusting for health status, socioeconomic status, and provider availability reduced quartile 1 versus quartile 4 difference in ambulance transport rate by 43% (IRR 1.43; 95% CI 1.38 to 1.48) and proportion of ED visits by ambulance by 7% (IRR 1.145; 95% CI 1.135 to 1.155). Among the 3 covariate domains, health status was associated with the largest variability in ambulance transport rate (30.1%), followed by socioeconomic status (12.8%) and provider availability (2.9%). CONCLUSION:Geographic variability in ambulance use is large and associated with variation in patient health status and socioeconomic status.

SUBMITTER: Hanchate AD

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5614809 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Geographic Variation in Use of Ambulance Transport to the Emergency Department.

Hanchate Amresh D AD Paasche-Orlow Michael K MK Dyer K Sophia KS Baker William E WE Feng Chen C Feldman James J

Annals of emergency medicine 20170527 4

<h4>Study objective</h4>Evidence on variability in emergency medical services use is limited. We obtain national evidence on geographic variation in the use of ambulance transport to the emergency department (ED) among Medicare enrollees and assess the role of health status, socioeconomic status, and provider availability.<h4>Methods</h4>We used 2010 Medicare claims data for a random sample of 999,999 enrollees aged 66 years and older, and identified ambulance transport and ED use. The main outc ...[more]

PMID: 28559039

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background:Dialysis patients who require ambulance transport to the emergency department ("ambulance-ED") may subsequently require timely dialysis in a monitored setting ("urgent dialysis"). Objective:The purpose of this study was to develop and internally validate a risk prediction model for urgent dialysis based on patient characteristics at the time of paramedic assessment before ambulance-ED. Design:Cohort Study. Setting:Region of Nova Scotia, Canada, covered by a single emergency medical services provider. Patients:Thrice-weekly hemodialysis patients who initiated dialysis between 2009 and 2013 (follow-up to 2015) and experienced one or more ambulance-ED events. Measurements:The primary outcome ("urgent dialysis") was defined as dialysis within 24 hours of an ambulance-ED in a monitored setting or dialysis within 24 hours of an ambulance-ED with an initial ED potassium of >6.5 mmol/L. Predictors of urgent dialysis based on paramedic assessment before ambulance-ED included presenting complaint, vital signs and time from last dialysis to ambulance dispatch. Methods:Associations with urgent dialysis were analyzed using logistic regression from which a risk prediction model was created. The model was internally validated using bootstrapping and model performance was assessed by discrimination and calibration. Results:Among 197 patients, there were 624 ambulance-ED events and 87 episodes of urgent dialysis. Weakness as a presenting complaint (odds ratio [OR]: 4.62, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.23-17.29), >24 hours since last dialysis (OR: 2.09, 95% CI: 1.15-3.81), and vital signs, including heart rate <60 beats/minute (OR: 3.06, 95% CI: 1.09-8.61), oxygen saturation <90% (OR: 3.04, 95% CI: 1.55-5.94), elevated respiratory rate (?20 breaths/min), and systolic blood pressure>160 mmHg, were associated with urgent dialysis after ambulance-ED. A risk prediction model incorporating these variables had very good discrimination (C-statistic: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.76-0.86). The negative predictive value was 93.6% using the optimal cut point. Of patients who were predicted to need urgent dialysis but were transported to a facility incapable of providing it, 31% were re-transported for urgent dialysis. Limitations:Findings of our study may not be generalizable to other centers where the practice of ambulance transfer and availability of monitored dialysis may differ, and data were lacking for potential missed dialysis sessions or changes in routine dialysis scheduling. Conclusions:Patient characteristics at the time of paramedic assessment are associated with urgent dialysis after ambulance-ED. This risk prediction model has the potential to guide dialysis patient transport to dialysis-capable facilities when needed.

Project description:Clinical handovers of patient care among healthcare professionals is vulnerable to the loss of important clinical information. A verbal report is typically provided by paramedics and documented by emergency department (ED) triage nurses. Paramedics subsequently complete a patient care report which is submitted electronically. This emergency medical system (EMS) patient care report often contains details of paramedic assessment and management that is not all captured in the nursing triage note. EMS patient care reports are often unavailable for review by emergency physicians and nurses. Two processes occur in the distribution of EMS patient care reports. The first is an external process to the ED that is influenced by the prehospital emergency medical system and results in the report being faxed to the ED. The second process is internal to the ED that requires clerical staff to distribute the fax report to accompany patient charts. A baseline audit measured the percentage of EMS patient care reports that were available to emergency physicians at the time of initial patient assessments and showed a wide variation in the availability of EMS reports. Also measured were the time intervals from patient transfer from EMS to ED stretcher until the EMS report was received by fax (external process measure) and the time from receiving the EMS fax report until distribution to patient chart (internal process measure). These baseline measures showed a wide variation in the time it takes to receive the EMS reports by fax and to distribute reports. Improvement strategies consisted of: 1. Educating ED clerical staff about the importance of EMS reports 2. Implementing a new process to minimize ED clerical staff handling of EMS reports for nonactive ED patients 3. Elimination of the automatic retrieval of old hospital charts and their distribution for ED patients 4. Introduction of an electronic dashboard for patients arriving by ambulance to facilitate more efficient distribution of EMS reports. Implementation of change strategies did not result in a significant improvement in the percentage of EMS reports available to emergency physicians at the time of initial patient assessment. However, tracking both external and internal processes that influence EMS report availability showed the internal process time from fax report receipt to distribution significantly improved. This improvement reflected the change strategies that were all directed at improving the internal process. EMS patient care reports are more efficiently processed and distributed in the ED due to change strategies implemented that targeted the ED's internal process of EMS report distribution. The external process responsible for transmitting EMS reports to the ED is the limiting factor that prevents consistent timely access of EMS reports by emergency physicians and will require dedicated improvement strategies.

Project description:Aim: To provide data on the inadequate use of emergency medical transports services (EMTS) in children and underlying contributing factors. Methods: This was a prospective single-center cohort study (01/2017-12/2017) performed at the Saarland University Children's Hospital, Homburg, Germany. Patients ≤20 years of age transported by EMTS for suspected acute illness/trauma were included and proportion of inadequate/adequate EMTS use, underlying contributing factors, and additional costs were analyzed. Results: Three hundred seventy-nine patients (mean age: 9.0 ± 6.3 years; 55.7% male, 44.3% female) were included in this study. The three most common reasons for EMTS use were: central nervous system (30.6%), respiratory system affection (14.0%), and traumas (13.2%). ETMS use was categorized as inadequate depending on physician's experience: senior physician (58.8%), pediatrician (54.9%), resident (52.7%). All three physicians considered 127 (33.5%) cases to be medically indicated for transportation by EMTS, and 177 (46.7%) to be medically not indicated. The following parameters were significantly associated with inadequate EMTS use: non-acute onset of symptoms (OR 2.5), parental perception as non-life-threatening (OR 1.7), and subsequent out-patient treatment (OR 4.0). Conversely, transport by an emergency physician (OR 3.5) and first time parental EMTS call (OR 1.7) were associated with adequate use of EMTS. Moreover, a significant relation existed between maternal, respectively, paternal educational status and inadequate EMTS use (each p = 0.01). Using multiple logistic regression analysis, non-acute onset of symptoms (OR 2.2) was associated with inadequate use of EMTS while first time parental EMTS call (OR 1.8), transport by an emergency physician (OR 3.3), and need for in-patient treatment (OR 4.0) were associated with adequate use of EMTS. Conclusion: A substantial number of pediatric EMTS is medically not indicated. Possibly, specific measures including multifaceted educational efforts may be helpful in reducing unnecessary EMTS use.

Dataset Information

Geographic Variation in Use of Ambulance Transport to the Emergency Department.

Publications

Geographic Variation in Use of Ambulance Transport to the Emergency Department.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure